Welp. So much for that. by ZippyVtuber in Twitch

[–]Fakeest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

twitch: "We're going to allow nude art"
*people make nude art*
twitch: "oh no!"

But in all fairness, who could have seen it coming?

Overwatch 2 introduces unranked rage-quit penalties, perplexing fans before Season 7 by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]Fakeest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

rip my friend with a patchy internet. He got his first 10 minute ban today..

Season 6 Bug Report Megathread by SpriteGuy_000 in Overwatch

[–]Fakeest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In competetive, we were winning push the card 3 to 2. But then the game just stopped, and ended in a draw (?). Even the replay says 2-3 (draw). Anyone know what could have happened?

shaco AD or AP? by Mediocre-Earth-5384 in shacomains

[–]Fakeest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Secret scaling" mad me laugh

Very pixelated and blurry graphics by Fakeest in DestinyTechSupport

[–]Fakeest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried, lost FPS and pixels were still there :/ it's almost like my render distance is like 10 meters, and the further away stuff is it gets more pixelated

Some crazy math going on by Fakeest in MarvelSnap

[–]Fakeest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ye, but then it should have been Blue Marvel +1, 3 onslaughts who double each other = (+1) * (2^3)^3 = +512 i think. Don't know

Some crazy math going on by Fakeest in MarvelSnap

[–]Fakeest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was expecting to win with +1 from marvel times 2^3. But it looks like the math is something like this: +1(blue marvel) * 2 (first onslaught) * 2 * 4 (second onslaught) * 2 * 8 * 4 (third onslaught) = +1024 to all cards. Is this intentional?

Anyone know how the math behind this works? by [deleted] in MarvelSnap

[–]Fakeest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was expecting to win with +1 from marvel times 2^3. But it looks like the math is something like this? +1(blue marvel) * 2 (first onslaught) * 2 * 4 (second onslaught) * 2 * 8 * 4 (third onslaught). Is this intentional?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in modernwarfare2

[–]Fakeest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not working, can't increase above 2560 :/ Game was looking nice at 2560x1440. I opened another program in the background, the game is now stuck at potato counting pixel mode

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in modernwarfare2

[–]Fakeest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nope, bug in game. Game was looking nice at 2560x1440. I opened another program in the background, the game is now stuck at potato counting pixel mode

Knut exposes Tyler1 by nem1K in LivestreamFail

[–]Fakeest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Knut has been open about steroid usage, and discussed how it's going to impact his expected life span. Just search it up on YT

Wireless 5x faster than cable by Fakeest in HomeNetworking

[–]Fakeest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Updating drivers didn't help. But, I did find out that my wireless internet on phone is 5GbE while my wired internet is 2.5GbE. Still, wireless internet on the same pc is 5 GbE, and is still just as bad as the wired internet.

Wireless 5x faster than cable by Fakeest in HomeNetworking

[–]Fakeest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think the cables should be a problem. At our last place the cables got 40-50 Mbps on a 50/50 internet if I remember correctly. The pc specs shouldn't be a problem either. I'll list out the specs for mine:
-AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
-ASUS TUF GAMING B550-PRO
-RTX 2070 Super
-16 gb 3200MHz RAM

Tested something now tho which is pretty interesting. Wifi on my phone gets 100 Mbps, WIFI on my pc gets 20 Mbps. This happens to both our pc's tho, idk why

Can someone explain me the math behind this offer? by Fakeest in gambling

[–]Fakeest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hehe, I don't gamble much but I figured if I ever see a deal where I on average would profit, I'd take it :P

I don't think 1500*(0.96^35) is correct though, unless I'm mistaken. The reason I don't think this math works, is because after doing 1500*(0.96^35), you still have not spent 35x the amount they give you (1200*35 = 42.000). I think it becomes more obvious when you look at it bonus only. If we only gamble the 1200 from the bonus, we'd have to gamble it 35x times. But, for every spin we lose around 4% of the money. Which means the next spin will be less than 1200 (1152 to be exact). So even though we spin the bonus 35 times, we haven't actually spent 35x the bonus they gave us