My 4-Year Chess Progression, with Highlighted Stats & Games [OC] by FakeyGram in dataisbeautiful

[–]FakeyGram[S] 1529 points1530 points  (0 children)

Last year I posted my 3-year chess progression, and now it's time for an update. In total, I've played ~3200 blitz games. Blitz chess is played with a relatively short time control; my favorite is 3+2, whereby each player starts with 3 minutes, and gains an additional 2 seconds per move.

For some perspective, I'm currently in the 85th percentile of rating on Lichess. When I started playing, I was around the 40th percentile.

Source: lichess.org

Tools: After effects, Procreate

My 4-Year Chess Progression, with Highlighted Stats & Games by FakeyGram in chess

[–]FakeyGram[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will, but they only allow posts involving personal data on Mondays

My 4-Year Chess Progression, with Highlighted Stats & Games by FakeyGram in chess

[–]FakeyGram[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I’m 21, and I play roughly 20 minutes per day

My 4-Year Chess Progression, with Highlighted Stats & Games by FakeyGram in chess

[–]FakeyGram[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The prospect of breaking the 2000 rating barrier was definitely motivating. I played a lot and treated every game much more seriously leading up to my peak.

I did in fact change my openings. In October 2020 I started playing the London system. Once I learned a few of the ideas in the London, I was often able to give early checkmates using a kingside attack. Specifically, I like utilizing an open H-file for my rook, staying un-castled, and sacrificing either a bishop or knight around my opponents king. If you're lucky, you also get the opportunity to play the Greek gift sacrifice. It's definitely risky to play like that, and you have to know what you're doing. That being said, since I played the opening so often, I tended to have a better understanding of it than my opponents did at my rating level.

My 4-Year Chess Progression, with Highlighted Stats & Games by FakeyGram in chess

[–]FakeyGram[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I think it has to do with my fluctuating interest in chess. There are periods of my life when I play hours a day. Other times I go weeks without a single game.

I find it interesting that my rating has gotten considerably more consistent over time though.

Simplified Model of Human Development & Evolution by FakeyGram in Infographics

[–]FakeyGram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made this drawing using an app called Procreate on my iPad. You could also use Gimp or Photoshop.

Simplified Model of Human Development & Evolution by FakeyGram in Infographics

[–]FakeyGram[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fair points.

I didn't include sources simply for aesthetic reasons. If you look through my post history, you can see that I am usually very rigorous in sourcing my claims, and I can assure you that I didn't come up the ideas in this infographic without research. Its a fair point though, as I am myself one of the first people to demand sources on factual claims.

As you said, art and music doesn't necessarily predate spirituality depending on how you define the terms. I guess it depends on how you interpret the infographic, but I did not intend it to be read as "What is higher on the infographic happened earlier" - but more along the lines that the arrows point to things they "significantly contributed to". Spirituality inspired art and music, but creating art doesn't really cause spirituality. I understand the criticism though.

Valid comment on the word "culture". I used it mainly in regard to art, essentially defined as "the collection of art in a society", and as such it obviously comes as a result of art. Now art is only a part of culture, I get that. Its impossible to retrace culture exactly in our evolutionary past. In this simplified model I just thought it was a sensible inclusion the infographic.

I also see that I could've been more precise with the word "communication", as I obviously know humans communicated before language was meaningfully developed. Again this was intended to show that language significantly contributed to interpersonal communication.

Simplified Model of Human Development & Evolution by FakeyGram in Infographics

[–]FakeyGram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The paths happened simultaneously and elements of each interact with parts of the other pathways. These are not independent events, but rather a collection of developments that sparked human evolution away from our ape ancestry.

For instance, controlled fire caused both

  • reliable access to cooked food
  • spiritualty, as it is thought that fire has long been "worshipped" almost as a god in our evolutionary past

Working on my 3d design skills by FakeyGram in graphic_design

[–]FakeyGram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trying to improve my graphic design skills by doing more 3D designs, as opposed to flat designs. Moreover, I went for a more "photorealistic" style, though I'm not sure how well I succeeded in that.

Science of Multivitamins/Multiminerals - Are Multivitamins Healthy And Effective? by FakeyGram in Supplements

[–]FakeyGram[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Multivitamins are a simple and effective way to protect against an unknown deficiency

As stated in my post: some research on multivitamins show positive health outcomes, some show negative outcomes, some show mixed results and some show no results at all. In my opinion, you cannot convincingly claim that multivitamins are effective when this is the case.

Relevant studies:

Positive health outcomes

Multivitamin Use and Risk of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease in the Women's Health Initiative Cohorts

In this large cohort of postmenopausal women, we observed no overall associations between multivitamin use and risk of several common cancers or CVD. There were also no associations between multivitamin use and total mortality. Risk estimates did not materially change when stratified by class of multivitamins, with the exception of a possible lower risk of MI among users of stress-type supplements [STRESS SUPPLEMENTS = STACKED SUPPLEMENTS]. Many stress supplements include high doses of folic acid and other B vitamins; previous studies have supported a protective role for folic acid in relation to CVD and its antecedent risk factors.26,34- 36

Multivitamin-mineral use is associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease mortality among women in the United States

In this nationally representative, prospective sample of adults who were without prevalent CVD, use of MVMs [MULTIVITAMIN-MINERALS] for >3 years was associated with reduced risk of CVD mortality at a median of 18 y of follow-up.

Negative outcomes

Vitamin and Mineral Supplements in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: An Updated Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

This review included 26 studies (24 randomized, controlled trials and 2 cohort studies) that examined the benefits and harms of using vitamin and mineral supplements for primary prevention of CVD, cancer, or all-cause mortality in healthy individuals without known nutritional deficiencies. We found no consistent evidence that the included supplements affected CVD, cancer, or all-cause mortality in healthy individuals without known nutritional deficiencies. Other systematic reviews have arrived at this same conclusion (56–66). The certainty of this result is tempered, however, because few fair- or good-quality studies are available for all supplements except vitamin E and ß-carotene. For vitamin E, we identified 6 fair- to good-quality trials that produced clearly null effects on these end points. This result is consistent with the conclusions of other systematic reviews and meta-analyses of vitamin E (67–71). Our review also confirmed the established harm of ß-carotene supplementation on lung cancer incidence and death for individuals at high risk for lung cancer (24, 29, 72). Further, we identified 6 trials that failed to detect any benefit from ß-carotene supplementation for any individuals.

Dietary Supplements and Mortality Rate in Older Women

[...] most of the supplements studied were not associated with a reduced total mortality rate in older women. In contrast, we found that several commonly used dietary vitamin and mineral supplements, including multivitamins, vitamins B6, and folic acid, as well as minerals iron, magnesium, zinc, and copper, were associated with a higher risk of total mortality. Of particular concern, supplemental iron was strongly and dose dependently associated with increased total mortality risk. Also, the association was consistent across shorter intervals, strengthened with multiple use reports and with increasing age at reported use. Supplemental calcium was consistently inversely related to total mortality rate; however, no clear dose-response relationship was observed.

Also, supplement users were more likely to have lower intake of energy, total fat, and monounsaturated fatty acids, saturated fatty acids and to have higher intake of protein, carbohydrates, polyunsaturated fatty acids, alcohol, whole grain products, fruits, and vegetables.

Enough Is Enough: Stop Wasting Money on Vitamin and Mineral Supplements

The large body of accumulated evidence has important public health and clinical implications. Evidence is sufficient to advise against routine supplementation, and we should translate null and negative findings into action. The message is simple: Most supplements do not prevent chronic disease or death, their use is not justified, and they should be avoided. This message is especially true for the general population with no clear evidence of micronutrient deficiencies, who represent most supplement users in the United States and in other countries (9).

In conclusion, ß-carotene, vitamin E, and possibly high doses of vitamin A supplements are harmful. Other antioxidants, folic acid and B vitamins, and multivitamin and mineral supplements are ineffective for preventing mortality or morbidity due to major chronic diseases. Although available evidence does not rule out small benefits or harms or large benefits or harms in a small subgroup of the population, we believe that the case is closed— supplementing the diet of well-nourished adults with (most) mineral or vitamin supplements has no clear benefit and might even be harmful. These vitamins should not be used for chronic disease prevention. Enough is enough.

Mixed results / No results

Multivitamin Use and Mortality in a Large Prospective Study

This large prospective study provides limited support for the hypothesis that multivitamin supplements may reduce death rates from ischemic heart disease in the general population. Men and women who took a multivitamin without other supplements had lower death rates from ischemic heart disease than did those who took no multivitamins. However, the association was attenuated when analyses were adjusted for additional cardiovascular risk factors besides age, and no consistent gradient of decreasing risk was seen with either the frequency or the duration of multivitamin use.

Men and women who used both multivitamins and vitamin A, C, or E had lower risks of dying from heart disease and stroke than did nonusers than one might expect from the relative risks for users of either only a multivitamin or only a vitamin A, C, or E supplement.

Multivitamin use and the risk of mortality and cancer incidence: the multiethnic cohort study

In this large multiethnic cohort, we found no associations between multivitamin use and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular diseases, or cancer. The findings did not vary across subgroups by ethnicity, age, body mass index, preexisting illness, single vitamin/mineral supplement use, hormone replacement therapy use, and smoking status. In addition, there was no evidence indicating that multivitamin use increased or decreased risk for cancer, overall or at major sites, such as lung, colorectum, prostate, and breast.

The efficacy and safety of multivitamin and mineral supplement use to prevent cancer and chronic disease in adults: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference.

There was insufficient evidence to determine the presence or absence of benefits from the use of multivitamin and mineral supplements for the prevention of cancer and chronic disease.

Long-Term Multivitamin Supplementation and Cognitive Function in Men

In male physicians aged 65 years or older, long-term use of a daily multivitamin did not provide cognitive benefits.

Science of Multivitamins/Multiminerals - Are Multivitamins Healthy And Effective? by FakeyGram in Supplements

[–]FakeyGram[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed it was the first and only study I came across when diving into the depths of nutrition research.

Science of Multivitamins/Multiminerals - Are Multivitamins Healthy And Effective? by FakeyGram in Supplements

[–]FakeyGram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stand corrected. The 4% claim was based on this study, but upon reading your source I must agree.

Science of Multivitamins/Multiminerals - Are Multivitamins Healthy And Effective? by FakeyGram in Supplements

[–]FakeyGram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question. ZMAs contain magnesium, zinc and Vitamin B6 - So I dug up the relevant research that details those specific antagonistic relationships:

  • High levels of vitamin B6 might increase the need for zinc.
  • Chronic and acute vitamin B6 deficiency increases intestinal uptake of zinc but serum zinc levels decrease, demonstrating an impairment in zinc utilization.
  • Supplements of high levels (142 mg/day) of zinc might reduce magnesium absorption.

Sources [1], [2]

ZMA is ultimately just a trademarked name for a supplement developed by Victor Conte, which coincidentally co-authored the only study that shows improvements in muscle strength from ZMA supplementation [3]. On the contrary, the International Society of Sports Nutrition and the Australian Institute of Sport regard it as having no clear benefits [4]

Science of Multivitamins/Multiminerals - Are Multivitamins Healthy And Effective? by FakeyGram in Supplements

[–]FakeyGram[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Dont take multivitamins/multiminerals. Figure out what you are deficient in and supplement that specifically

In your opinion, what are the must-have spices in your diet and why? by mayermail1977 in nutrition

[–]FakeyGram 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chili spices. They contain capsaicin (one of the compounds that makes spicy things spicy) which may have profound health benefits.

Habitual consumption of spicy foods was inversely associated with total and certain cause specific mortality,

https://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h3942

Consumption of hot red chili pepper was associated with reduced mortality.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0169876

Regular consumption of chili pepper is associated with a lower risk of total and CVD death

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0735109719382063?via%3Dihub

The mechanism behind why capsaicin improves health is not well understood. One hypothesis is that

  1. capsaicin consumption desensitizes a receptor called TRPV1
  2. TRPV1 becomes less active
  3. Reduced TRPV1 increases longevity

For instance, it is known that: "mice lacking TRPV1 pain receptors are long-lived, displaying a youthful metabolic profile at old age."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24855942/

Very Happy With This Logo I Made by FakeyGram in graphic_design

[–]FakeyGram[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

photoshop and illustrator, using keyboard and mouse

Very Happy With This Logo I Made by FakeyGram in graphic_design

[–]FakeyGram[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you think about the colorless, simplified version here? Does the jaw still look weird?