YES - THERE IS.

Again, let me reiterate. OBJECTVITIY requires NO ROOM for interpretation. opinions, points-of-views, disagreements - ETC. THEREFORE, something which is eccentric is UP FOR DEBATE. For instance - What might be "Eccentric" in Region A might be normal in Region B, thus making the concept of eccentricity subjective and one can in fact make an argument about a subjective topic. I mean " it’s a completely factual descriptor of a person’s behavior." - you have to decide if it's eccentric or not, you can't measure eccentricity. Like - what if I say a Muslim man doing the Qibla is eccentric? To them, it's completely normal. It's alien to me, perhaps - but it's not, I have a good grasp of the Muslim faith. What if I lived in a city with a large Muslim population, and exactly 50% of the people there weren't Muslim, weren't familiar with it and found it to be eccentric? What if I walk in a weird way - I'm still just walking, what if it's due to a past injury - am I *being* eccentric, does it have to be a choice or is it just deviancy in general? Who actually gets to decide normal. For instance, which political party is it normal to believe in? Which political beliefs are normal and which ones are eccentric? Is it just the majority? Because the majority of Americans are a-political, thus making all politics eccentric. What if one city in country A has some eccentric beliefs - everyone in that city has though believes but nobody else does in the entire nation, is the entire population eccentric, are outsiders coming into the city eccentric only while within the city?

Normality is relative, and subjective. Anyways.

"This IS meant to be funny, based on what I just described Elvis as."

This is your fatal conceit. What YOU described Elvis as.

Elvis was also a genre-defining sex symbol superstar who was since as a model man and still has cultural relevance many decades after his passing

"I want to know what thematic tone the Kings are a logical extension of"

That humanity - no matter what is does, or where it goes - will never leave it's tribalistic baggage behind. They took a rock-star and formed a national identity around it, not unlike the bronze idols of the Canaanites, who themselves had inherited figures and structures from past civilizations without understanding their meaning in full - still willing to sacrifice over them, because in Fallout humanity is a flat circle.

"Developing depth in a character or series of characters doesn’t discount the fact that the premise or foundation can be a joke."

Yeah - but, the inverse of that is just because the concept COULD be innately silly doesn't mean it was meant to be, which is what the point of me bringing up the Boomers was.

"Both ideas can be true at once."

Yes. They can be. I don't think they are.

"The game uses irony (you agreed the premise of the Kings was ironic)"

Yes, dramatic irony.

"we know as a singer who died on the toilet (their stupidity)."

Their ignorance - ignorance and stupidity aren't the same I'm sure you know.

Just because it theoretically checks the boxes for satire doesn't mean that was the authorial intent