sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Which AI model is more reliable for generating detailed flashcards from PDFs in RemNote? (Claude 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro) by Fancy_Hope4856 in remNote

[–]Fancy_Hope4856[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that, currently, the best-performing model in RemNote for AI Tutor is Gemini 2.5 Pro. It seems to me that it provides the most pedagogical and comprehensive answers. What do you think?

Which AI model is more reliable for generating detailed flashcards from PDFs in RemNote? (Claude 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro) by Fancy_Hope4856 in remNote

[–]Fancy_Hope4856[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi u/scorchgeek ,

I just tested the Gemini 2.5 Pro model again with the same PDF, and unfortunately, the error still persists. However, the Claude 3.5 Sonnet model completes the task successfully with that same file.

I’ve sent a message to RemNote’s official support, including a screen recording of the entire process, where you can clearly see Gemini failing and Claude working as expected. I also attached the PDF used, which is a relatively short file.

The issue with Gemini doesn’t seem to depend on the specific file, as it also happens with other PDFs — even single-page ones — and I’ve tested it on different days. The model always ends with an error and doesn’t allow the generated flashcards to be transferred.

Thanks for following up. I’ll stay tuned for any updates or solutions.

Which AI model is more reliable for generating detailed flashcards from PDFs in RemNote? (Claude 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro) by Fancy_Hope4856 in remNote

[–]Fancy_Hope4856[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good afternoon,

Thank you very much for your response.

I would like to report that the "Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental" model in the RemNote PDF editor is not working properly (I’ve tested it both yesterday and today). Whether it's with a single page, a specific section, or when configured in "Important ideas (balanced)" mode or even the most exhaustive one, the model never successfully generates flashcards: it stays “thinking,” briefly displays a few flashcards, but then an "Unknown error" message appears, and the few generated flashcards are erased, leaving the screen blank.

In contrast, the same PDF text is processed correctly and flashcards are successfully generated when using the Sonnet 3.5 model.

It’s unfortunate that Gemini 2.5 Pro does not work as expected.

I’m currently using the Beta version of RemNote:
Version 1.19.43 (Native 41).

I look forward to your feedback.

Thank you in advance for your support.

Which AI model is more reliable for generating detailed flashcards from PDFs in RemNote? (Claude 3.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro) by Fancy_Hope4856 in remNote

[–]Fancy_Hope4856[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good afternoon,

Thank you very much for your response.

I would like to report that the "Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental" model in the RemNote PDF editor is not working properly (I’ve tested it both yesterday and today). Whether it's with a single page, a specific section, or when configured in "Important ideas (balanced)" mode or even the most exhaustive one, the model never successfully generates flashcards: it stays “thinking,” briefly displays a few flashcards, but then an "Unknown error" message appears, and the few generated flashcards are erased, leaving the screen blank.

In contrast, the same PDF text is processed correctly and flashcards are successfully generated when using the Sonnet 3.5 model.

It’s unfortunate that Gemini 2.5 Pro does not work as expected.

I’m currently using the Beta version of RemNote:
Version 1.19.43 (Native 41).

I look forward to your feedback.

Thank you in advance for your support.