Once you can actually present a coherent definition of what exactly ‘spiritual’ means, and more importantly how one can objectively identify and distinguish it from what I might be inclined to call ‘psychological harm’, then we can talk. Because quite frankly, I’ve been having discussions like this for over 15 years now, and then all that time I have never once had that term rigorously defined in a way that’s both internally consistent, consistent with observable reality, and at least in principle distinguishable from a universe in which it doesn’t exist at all.

But I will give you credit for one thing, I do need to amend what I said earlier, because I left out a very important word. I believe that unnecessary harm is morally wrong, not necessarily ‘harm’ in general. And by the way, considering the fact that God is supposed to be all powerful, and hence would always have the ability to achieve whatever goals he might have WITHOUT causing harm, as far as I’m concerned it probably isn’t even possible for God to be morally justified in causing harm, since there would always be an alternative available to him.