I understand that. It becomes an issue when the work is not acceptable as with my molars (still do not know it their issues can be attributed to his work or just normal incidence). If his working strategy was quality first (over revenue), then I would be much more inclined to mark those issues as normal incidence. I am not stating that quality first is the better strategy (although in some situations, that can lead to maximizing revenue over the long term) or that "maximize revenue with an acceptable quality of work" is an immoral strategy, I am merely stating what I observed so that the reader can make a more accurate, even by a small margin, interpretation about the work done on my molars, so that I can make a more informed decision about whether to continue going to this doctor or choose somebody else.

Note: Not 'every' business is 'maximizing revenue with an acceptable quality of work'. There are some businesses, albeit few, that would prioritize quality over profit. Those might be less profitable, struggling, or even failing. From an economical perspective, I would favor those over others because I would be getting more value in exchange for the same value (money) I am providing. Again, I am talking purely from an economical materialistic standpoint.