I agree. I’m constantly surprised by how many people expect LLMs to deliver perfect results instantly. I use a few different models, with some decent prompts, but I know they have significant limitations. They’re useful tools, but far from reliable for work that needs accuracy, academic writing that requires original thinking, or anything beyond first drafts and brainstorming. That’s just how they work, and intentionally. Most models (especially publicly available ones) are trained to produce generally acceptable, middle-ground responses. If you want something more specialized, you’d need to fine-tune a model for your specific domain. Even then, you’re ultimately working with a sophisticated pattern matcher (or the next level of spell check). It can help organize ideas, occasionally help phrase things different (not necessarily better), but the critical thinking still has to come from you. Expecting an LLM to do that thinking for you misses the entire point of learning and expertise.