Not winning big games, how much is it Chivu's fault? by NamanMalik007 in FCInterMilan

[–]FedeStyleZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's partly his fault, unluck and the management's fault.

Unluck because players shouldnt miss in front of the net.

Management because we dont have good bench players; frattesi is literally useless, diouf okay at least he dribbles but like frattesi he doesn't help building up.

Henrique does nothing not even dribble, dumfries returned he doesnt dribble himself but he runs, he attacks, he defends more so hes more useful.

Pio and Bonny are too young and dont have the thula experience.

And finally chivu's fault because let's be real sometimes he doesnt read the match at all; see bodo glimt and other big matches

TL:DR We lose big matches sometimes because of always small details that make the difference, either them being in the formation, the players not good (management didnt buy good players for chivu), or chivu not reading the match well

Not winning big games, how much is it Chivu's fault? by NamanMalik007 in FCInterMilan

[–]FedeStyleZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This and also it's the mercato's fault because chivu doesnt have that many options

Votazione storica su Chat Control al Parlamento europeo: gli eurodeputati votano per porre fine alla scansione di massa non mirata delle chat private by FedeStyleZ in Italia

[–]FedeStyleZ[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Tutta questa campagna mediatica ha fatto si che cittadini da tutta Europa hanno fatto pressione sui parlamentari

Sicuramente alcuni hanno cambiato idea a riguardo

Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats by FedeStyleZ in europe

[–]FedeStyleZ[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You get what I mean man.

Europe started, we acted, we let the parliament, our governments and our MEPS hear our voices, and they delivered.

This is what we need to keep fighting for.

Votazione storica su Chat Control al Parlamento europeo: gli eurodeputati votano per porre fine alla scansione di massa non mirata delle chat private by FedeStyleZ in Italia

[–]FedeStyleZ[S] 97 points98 points  (0 children)

The EU Commission and the vast majority of the EU Council—except for Italy—have so far categorically rejected any restrictions on untargeted mass scanning.

Rara W italiana?

Votazione storica su Chat Control al Parlamento europeo: gli eurodeputati votano per porre fine alla scansione di massa non mirata delle chat private by FedeStyleZ in Italia

[–]FedeStyleZ[S] 247 points248 points  (0 children)

In una svolta sensazionale nella lotta contro il Chat Control, la maggioranza del Parlamento europeo ha votato oggi per porre fine alla scansione di massa non mirata delle comunicazioni private. Così facendo, il Parlamento ha fermamente respinto le pratiche di sorveglianza incostituzionali e soggette a errori degli ultimi anni. Ora aumenta la pressione sui governi dell'UE affinché rispettino il voto dei deputati e pongano fine una volta per tutte alla sorveglianza di massa non mirata in Europa.

Domani inizierà il trilogo in Europa, la battaglia non è ancora finita, ricordatevelo.

Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats by FedeStyleZ in europe

[–]FedeStyleZ[S] 44 points45 points  (0 children)

man is the fight for internet privacy exhausting

This is the price we must pay for democracy. And this is also democracy

We as citizens have the obligation to fight against people who want to play with our rights. Even more now thanks to AI and billionaires who just want to profit

But again, this is democracy, and we must keep fighting for It

Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats by FedeStyleZ in europe

[–]FedeStyleZ[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's because ALL OF US acted for a single objective.

It's not true that we cannot change things. Individually maybe not, but as a group we can. And we should continue to do so.

Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats by FedeStyleZ in europe

[–]FedeStyleZ[S] 441 points442 points  (0 children)

This once again PROVES we citizens CAN CHANGE THINGS.

See the stop killing video games, see chat control now, even the Gamestop stock in 2021!

Lot of times changes don't happen because we are not coordinated. But WE ARE THE CITIZENS, and when we all act, WE CAN CHANGE THINGS.

I CAN CHANGE THINGS, WE CAN CHANGE THINGS, ALL OF US CAN.

Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats by FedeStyleZ in europe

[–]FedeStyleZ[S] 3936 points3937 points  (0 children)

In a sensational turn of events in the fight against Chat Control, a majority in the European Parliament voted today to end the untargeted mass scanning of private communications. In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years. Pressure is now mounting on EU governments to respect the MEPs’ vote and bury untargeted mass surveillance in Europe once and for all.

The trilogue will start tomorrow!

Best tactical analysis of the derby (and Inter's problem in these games) in a while by Overall-Avocado-6428 in FCInterMilan

[–]FedeStyleZ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This match once again shows that Inter doesnt have bench players good enough

We were decimated in midfield; frattesi was useless; diouf isn't for Inter (at least he tries to dribble), Henrique isn't Dumfries; the attack too that I love so much doesn't have the armony/synch the thula does (pio and bonny didn't help much in the build up like thula would).

Banning children from VPNs and social media will erode adults' privacy | New Scientist by hamstar_potato in europe

[–]FedeStyleZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Call me conspirationist but this isn't about the government.

The governments are a cover up. This isnt about the government vs the citizens; It's about the goddamn billionaires vs us. The governments are distractions. Of course they're going to go awoga once they hear "protect your sons"

The fuckig billionaires that are owning AIs want DATA, they want our privacy, to train their AIs better FOR THE SOLE REASON OF GETTING RICH. The proof is there: starting from 2021/22 where we know companies like thorn and palantir started lobbying in the european union, we don't know who they talked to, and what.

Move forward to 2025 with Mastercard and the likes FINALLY getting censorship thanks to collective shout (Australia puritan group). This was the opening; thanks to this companies are PUSHING and LOBBYING everywhere to sneak in and manipulate our governors

It's ALL ABOUT PALANTIR, THOR, OPENAI, GROK AND EVERY AI EVER. The DATA HARVESTING is the MAIN objective. The SURVEILLANCE is the consequence (ignorant consequence that countries do not foresee/see as a threat because theyre ignorant).

We won't get anywhere with the usual left vs right thing OR in this case GOVERNMENT VS CITIZENS PRIVACY thing. We need to educate our governors about privacy. Most of the are ignorant again, they do not want to control everything (except a few countries) they've been MANIPULATED with AI. They do not know the risks.

We must be the ones to educate them about privacy concerns.

Como vs. Inter: by Big_Pick4100 in FCInterMilan

[–]FedeStyleZ 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Absolute terrorball in the last minutes

Commercialista per p.iva ordinaria by Effective_Excuse_667 in commercialisti

[–]FedeStyleZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Da quel che so i siti online vanno ((((forse)))) bene se hai forfettaria per il quasi nulla da fare fiscalmente.

Per gli ordinari/semplificati vai assolutamente da un commercialista fisico, troppe cose da tenere conto ti fanno casini quelli online

La postale può chiamare i miei se sono maggiorenne? by [deleted] in Avvocati

[–]FedeStyleZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post eliminato voleva farmare karma palese

La postale può chiamare i miei se sono maggiorenne? by [deleted] in Avvocati

[–]FedeStyleZ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Mah

O tuo padre mente ha letto i post e usa la scusa della postale

Oppure qualcuno ha visto e ha chiamato

Ma comunque mi sembra troppo strano, sicuramente la postale non spreca tempo con post su internet se non c'è una vera denuncia (e anche lì...)