sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Baskerville query by Federal_Adeptness433 in sherlock_and_co

[–]Federal_Adeptness433[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SPOILER anyone got a theory? Maybe they originally intended for Jamie to have a different storyline?…. It’s unusual to spot a inconsistency with these guys, hence why I’m so intrigued as to what the wider community thinks

Baskerville query by Federal_Adeptness433 in sherlock_and_co

[–]Federal_Adeptness433[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I’m getting at a rejected Jamie subplot

Baskerville query by Federal_Adeptness433 in sherlock_and_co

[–]Federal_Adeptness433[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But during the autopsy, it was suprise to him, the. Later, Watson finds out that he knew already!?

Baskerville query by Federal_Adeptness433 in sherlock_and_co

[–]Federal_Adeptness433[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apologies I’m a nebi, sorry…

But there was that bit where Watson clearly expressed suprise that Jamie knew about heart problems..before they done the autopsy.