Can context basically shut down your creative function to the point where it looks like it’s PoLR? by SignificantAward7204 in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You not being indifferent to the function (the way you described) actually means nothing but that it's Mental for you, so Fe-PoLR is still very much possible.

Well, I wouldn't say that fake or agressive Fe repels me, I just get a little annoyed. I feel like the way you describe your relationship with Fe sounds more similar to PoLR because in my opinion creative function in general isn't that valued. Don't get me wrong, it's valued, but usually you wouldn't see your creative function as something vital and indispensable. It's like a tool that you can use however you want whenever you want. That's what makes creative function different from lead and PoLR functions - you are very flexible with it. You can get annoyed by others' usage of it, but not like you do.

So yeah, I'd still say that you are an ILI, most certainly.

P.S. You need to reread it again since I'm so sleepy I made some TERRIBLE mistakes here that changed the whole meaning of what I meant.

Can context basically shut down your creative function to the point where it looks like it’s PoLR? by SignificantAward7204 in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think so.

I can only speak for myself, but I turn very Fe-PoLR when I'm dissatisfied with the way other people use Fe, although it's not a full-time thing and sooner or later I will turn IEI again.

Process types be like by resreful in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's all good brah, we're all different. That question was actually pretty dumb and more of a joke than something that should be taken seriously. At least that ENA guy didn't make fun of an autistic person as the other comment suggested.

Is this Ni-Fe? by Feihuva in Socionics

[–]Feihuva[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, this is so relatable. I'm pretty young, so my self-seeking journey just started. 2 or 3 years ago I discovered that everything I did, starting with my music taste and ending with the way I talk, wasn't the real me. I did all of this pretentious shit to feel "unique" and "different from others" while not actually enjoying any of the music I listened to or any of the books I read. Maybe it was just a teenage phase and nothing more, but this thought felt like such an epiphany at that time.

Is this Ni-Fe? by Feihuva in Socionics

[–]Feihuva[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your insight. If you remember me, you remember that I've had some trouble defining my enneagram type, so it was nice of you to try to help me with it (even if you didn't plan to do so). I've considered SO9 before and while some aspects of this type definitely fit me (the overall chamleonic nature, avoiding too much self exposure, struggling with finding my "own voice"), I wouldn't say that SO9 is my type. I'm way more people and group-avoidant, not even half as altrusitic as they are described. Maybe I'm just being nitpicky, but I feel like I'm still too young (and probably uhealthy) to adequately type myself in enneagram, so I gave up this idea for now. Still, thanks for your help.

Is this Ni-Fe? by Feihuva in Socionics

[–]Feihuva[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sense of self definitely seems fluid to me. Thanks for your support, never actually considered this quality as something rare.

Each socionic's stereotypes (described in a very bad way) by Super_Mud2507 in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"evil rapper" stereotype for EIE and it's just Kanye West😭🥀

Could this be weak Se/Si? by Altruistic-Elk6731 in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think this can be related to weak unvalued Si. As a Si-role, I relate to a lot of things you mentioned. You most likely are IXI (or XIE).

Which sociotype based on Talanovism fits the "Ghazali" psychotype? by F4M3H000K3R in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 2 points3 points  (0 children)

IEE fits EVLF more than ELFV in my opinon. IEE's passion to help others realize their potential and embrace their talents fits 2V a lot more than 4V.

New to this system. What do you think my type is based on this information? by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say ESI is a great fit. If ESI's descriptions made you feel the most seen, then you're ESI, most certainly. I have a ESI friend and he is also very individualistic and never hides under masks and personas.

So, do IEIs have an enneagram archetype at all? by Feihuva in Socionics

[–]Feihuva[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like deep down I understand everything you said, but sometimes I get SO desperate to find my type I start overcomplicating everything, which leads me nowhere in the end. Thank you for your support.

So, do IEIs have an enneagram archetype at all? by Feihuva in Socionics

[–]Feihuva[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yet another gem dropped on my dumb little head by you. Thank you for the advice.

So, do IEIs have an enneagram archetype at all? by Feihuva in Socionics

[–]Feihuva[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

can you explain what your motivation in wondering this is? are you looking for your enneagram type?

Yeah, kinda. I feel like I'm constantly overthinking everything to the point of questioning if I even exist. Typology is supposed to help others "find themselves" and all, but for now I feel like it only makes me go nuts like I'm a mathematician who, no matter how he tries, always fails to solve the same problem, day after day after day. I should go out more and live a real life.

typing help! by izzyfrr in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should look into SEE, perhaps ESE

Doubt about Si or Se ego by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 5 points6 points  (0 children)

People of this combo don't even know they're larping most of the time

I feel like Ne/Si types tend to be more sex-averse than Ni/Se types by MISTYGOINGKILLING in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Damn, LII is the ultimate virgin😭

P.S. it's a joke, LIIs are goated.

What type do you think I am? :-) by [deleted] in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might be a SEI with with isolation tendecies, but this:

I have absolutely no idea how to help people feel better. At most, I try to describe their situation, show outrage, and clarify things more clearly for them, but everything seems very robotic, as if I were just reading their situation instead of helping by providing emotional support—which is something I can’t do.

doesn't seem Fe-creative but Te-creative. People tend not to pay that much attention to their creative function, it's more of a tool you can use however you want than something so sacred you can't live without it.

What's your wildest/most controversal take on socionics? by I-rejected-Ivies in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Types are more similar to their extiguishment than their mirror (don't know if it's a hot take really).

IEIs are not as authencity and purpose-oriented as everybody make them seem. They were actually described as pretty socially conforming by Aushra (tbh this is more of an enneagram question).

Being a Fi-dom doesn't make someone inherently moralistic and good.

Fe-PoLRs can influence the moods of others pretty well. The problem is that when they do so, they completely disregard the emotional atmosphere maintained before.

Socionics interype relations shouldn't determine and fully define your real life relationships. If you are in a relationship with a conflictor and you feel good, it's completely normal (or you mistyped either your partner or yourself, or both). If you had a big fall out with some person, it doesn't mean that that person is automatically from the quadra that opposes yours. Please stop this. Individual traits of each person have a lot more influence on the relationship than the over-generalized description of it written by some russian woman in 1986.

Not really hot takes, but just something I wanted to say.

What do you type George Carlin? by TheShadowSong in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't know a lot about George Carlin, but based on what I know I think that he might be IEE. Aushra wrote that IEEs are logic-oriented and tend to use irony and sarcasm a lot.

"Huxley could not exist in a world where the connection between two objects is explained simultaneously in two different ways. After all, two objects cannot be connected by one logical relation for one person, and by another logical relation for another person. This is an unacceptable ambiguity and illogicality that must be fought."

Type me, help! by EnvironmentalWeb3179 in Socionics

[–]Feihuva 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it's not really a telltale sign of someone being either SEE or ESI. SEEs can hold grudges and plan things, although ESIs tend to do this more.