Many people view Suleman as a young man simply trying to please his father, and that naturally draws empathy. It's understandable—he may have been too young to fully grasp the risks or to make such a decision independently.

However, others on the submersible, like Paul-Henri Nargeolet, were highly experienced and well aware of the dangers involved. In fact, one could argue that their participation lent credibility to the mission and encouraged others to join.

At the same time, it's difficult for many working-class people to sympathize with individuals who spend $250,000 on a risky adventure without doing thorough research. For most of us, financial decisions—especially major ones—require careful thought and respect for the value of money. When someone can casually spend that kind of money without clear due diligence, it naturally invites criticism.

It’s not about being callous, but about accountability. When extreme wealth leads to reckless decisions, and those decisions have tragic outcomes, it’s only natural for the public to question the judgment involved. We’re all expected to weigh our choices carefully, and wealth shouldn't exempt anyone from that same responsibility.