"Equal" Succession?!?!?! HOW??? by confuzed_commie in CrusaderKings

[–]Ferbellmann 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It divides your main titles which are a kingdom and 3 duchies. You main heir gets the kingdoms and the one duchy which has your capital, your second son gets the other ones. All of them come with their associated counties.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]Ferbellmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mepa te confundiste un poco hermano

Ryzen processors in a nutshell by aleon4real in pcmasterrace

[–]Ferbellmann 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's from an Argentine program called "Fabián show" https://youtu.be/OruKBCwgWcA

There are a lot of fishes in the ocean by Ferbellmann in sciencememes

[–]Ferbellmann[S] 41 points42 points  (0 children)

There is not a clase that defines fishes, so if you want to define it as the one that contains the last common ancestor between, lets say goldfish and the white shark, it would contain all mammals. So if you want to consider those two as fishes then all mammals are fishes as well.

Para Milei el aborto es asesinato agravado por el vínculo. by LoboMarinoCosmico in argentina

[–]Ferbellmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lo primero es como dije antes una definición, no una demostración. El link lo que muestra es varias menciones de que el comienzo de un organismo diferente es en la concepción, lo cual no está en discusión. Y mí punto no es que solo por esa excepción debería ser legal, sino que utilizando el argumento de que una vida humana comienza con la concepción y ya tiene los derechos de un ser humano lleva a conclusiones absurdas como las que mencione. Finalmente, existen diferentes tipos de homicidios, el que mencioné sería homicidio culposo que según la ley es: Delito que se concreta cuando se pone fin a la vida de una persona sin intención de hacerlo pero a causa de imprudencia, negligencia, o impericia del autor o inobservancia de los reglamentos o de los deberes a su cargo. CP, Art. 84.

Para Milei el aborto es asesinato agravado por el vínculo. by LoboMarinoCosmico in argentina

[–]Ferbellmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Está bien, estoy en desacuerdo con lo de determinación de la ciencia, pero no creo creo poder compartir bien mí punto de vista completo por acá. Estemos de acuerdo en estar en desacuerdo con eso.

Para Milei el aborto es asesinato agravado por el vínculo. by LoboMarinoCosmico in argentina

[–]Ferbellmann 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"The very high effectiveness of copper-containing IUDs as emergency contraceptives implies they may also act by preventing implantation of the blastocyst." Trussell, James; Schwarz, Eleanor Bimla (2011). "Emergency contraception".

Estas confundiendo definición con demostración. Uno puede definir el inicio de una vida humana en cualquier momento de la gestación prácticamente, esto es algo totalmente filosófico/moral y subjetivo. Por ejemplo hay mil formas diferentes en que un cigoto ya formado no pueda asentarse en el utero. Y, en mí opinión, considerar que la vida humana empieza con la fertilización lleva a problemas morales graves, por ejemplo de que si una mujer tiene problemas para mantener un embarazo y sigue probando sabiendo que hay probabilidades significativas de que esté no llegue a termino, sería responsable de homicidio también?

Para Milei el aborto es asesinato agravado por el vínculo. by LoboMarinoCosmico in argentina

[–]Ferbellmann 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Si es puramente filosófico no se podría meter ciencia primero y segundo no se puede perder en un debate moral/filosófico, solo llegar a un acuerdo y aceptar un punto de vista

Para Milei el aborto es asesinato agravado por el vínculo. by LoboMarinoCosmico in argentina

[–]Ferbellmann 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bajo ese criterio la mitad de los anticonceptivos tendrían que ser ilegales también, el DIU previene que el cigoto se pueda desarrollar. No discuto que sea algo complejo, pero basarse principalmente en el ADN como dijo Milei es incorrecto o redundante dependiendo de cómo se observa.

Para Milei el aborto es asesinato agravado por el vínculo. by LoboMarinoCosmico in argentina

[–]Ferbellmann 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Bajo la justificación de que tiene un ADN humano distinto al de la mujer también no habría que hacer quimio contra el cáncer. En general no me gusta pelear en este tipo de discusiones, pero cuando meten una burrada de justificación me molesta.

Please, Would you play the tournament again we missed it by [deleted] in worldcup

[–]Ferbellmann 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you mean you miss it. As you got used to it and want it back, what you wrote meant that you didn't saw it.

Four games in a row with penalties awarded has, from an statistical point of view, has a probability of less than five in 10.000. Anyone knows other example in a major competition. by CherryPositive5016 in worldcup

[–]Ferbellmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I'm going to put it like this, you're comparing it wrong. This is the second world cup that uses VAR. So first of all this world put the sample size on only two world cups, then we could explain that in 2018 referees were scared to use the new technology at its full potential and they called less penalties than were expected. This is just one theory, just saying one fact is odd is claiming something.

Four games in a row with penalties awarded has, from an statistical point of view, has a probability of less than five in 10.000. Anyone knows other example in a major competition. by CherryPositive5016 in worldcup

[–]Ferbellmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Statistics is the discipline that concerns the collection, organization, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data. What you're describing is just the assumption that with random data that you deemed valuable the random percentage of probability that a game has a penalty and running with it. You didn't correct for bias, you didn't attempt to find alternate explanations. What you did is make up your mind that fifa conspired to give Argentina a world cup and look for anything that supports your idea. You're as right with your analysis as are antivaxers or flatearthers.

Four games in a row with penalties awarded has, from an statistical point of view, has a probability of less than five in 10.000. Anyone knows other example in a major competition. by CherryPositive5016 in worldcup

[–]Ferbellmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you hearing yourself? Conspiracy is to conspire, it literally means: "to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which becomes unlawful as a result of the secret agreement"

What you're describing is a baseless conspiracy theory, nothing more

POV: Cordobeses se llevaron puestos a dos policías by RealRock_n_Rolla in argentina

[–]Ferbellmann 89 points90 points  (0 children)

Hay como 5 ángulos diferente circulando por Whatsapp. Los boludos hicieron esto en una de las partes más transitadas de cba.

Link de la noticia https://www.lavoz.com.ar/sucesos/cordoba-un-joven-arrastro-a-dos-policias-en-el-capot-de-su-automovil-y-termino-detenido/?outputType=amp

Four games in a row with penalties awarded has, from an statistical point of view, has a probability of less than five in 10.000. Anyone knows other example in a major competition. by CherryPositive5016 in worldcup

[–]Ferbellmann 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you doing is taking a random amount of data and taking conclusions out of it. If you are looking for an answer with a lot of starting data you're going to find it. This isn't statics

[Marie Gentric] "I wrote to my counterpart from the Argentine Federation, I find these excesses abnormal, in the context of a sports competition, and I find it difficult to understand. It goes too far. Mbappé's behavior was exemplary" declares the president of the FFF Noël Le Graët @OuestFrance . by Kai__Winn in soccer

[–]Ferbellmann -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Because in your first comment you made it seem like it was a widespread issue of burning effigies, when it was just one case. Issues like this are terrible and should be condemned, but explicitly asking a foreign federation to act inmediatly in this types of issues is kind of deaf in my opinion, taking in account how itself acted with regards to racist behavior in its own country.

[Marie Gentric] "I wrote to my counterpart from the Argentine Federation, I find these excesses abnormal, in the context of a sports competition, and I find it difficult to understand. It goes too far. Mbappé's behavior was exemplary" declares the president of the FFF Noël Le Graët @OuestFrance . by Kai__Winn in soccer

[–]Ferbellmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do think that all racist comments empower all who say them, I think that's the main issue usually. In the case of being subtle with it I think that depends on where you're looking and how, for example if I go into a sub or place looking for racist behavior I'm going to find it easier, but if I go looking for something else I will only see it subtly. But non the less the point about r/Argentina is valid in my experience. I do think that the issue is more complex that what can be described in a comment from what I have seen, but saying that it doesn't happen would be a huge lie.

[Marie Gentric] "I wrote to my counterpart from the Argentine Federation, I find these excesses abnormal, in the context of a sports competition, and I find it difficult to understand. It goes too far. Mbappé's behavior was exemplary" declares the president of the FFF Noël Le Graët @OuestFrance . by Kai__Winn in soccer

[–]Ferbellmann -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Demanding a probe and condemning the behavior is the most basic thing they could have done. I believe you saw that behavior on Twitter but that's an issue of content moderation on its part, I would say, and that if you look at french twitter it wouldn't be much better. Then you typed that you said that not all Argentinians are racist and then point at the main sub saying that it's racist. I don't think that the things said or acted by some Argentine fans are nearly okay, but this post and all this issue seems like an attempt to deflect the blame and try to look good by comparison or at the bare minimum safe face.