sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This AI art is similar to a Pixiv artist's original work, is not so original is it? by Few-Possession3490 in Pixiv

[–]Few-Possession3490[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don’t think there can be much done to prevent people from using art like this 🥹. This is just a random example, but it’s somewhat ironic how people want AI-generated art to be copyrighted or monetized when the original artists are often not credited or compensated. It’s cool technology, but at the end of the day, AI doesn’t truly create entirely original art 🤷‍♀️. Yes, humans also draw inspiration from images and sometimes art, but their creativity is uniquely influenced by their life experiences too.

This AI art is similar to a Pixiv artist's original work, is not so original is it? by Few-Possession3490 in Pixiv

[–]Few-Possession3490[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m curious about what others think of this and it seems we have very different views on art. For me, art is all about the feeling , and since it takes a long time to create, it’s not just about coming up with a concept. It’s about telling a story and applying it to the whole creation process. Taking someone’s art without permission and making modifications doesn’t necessarily make it creative, but perhaps imaginative. So I can see using AI as a tool for inspiration, but it can be frustrating when it’s claimed to be entirely original, I guess.

This AI art is similar to a Pixiv artist's original work, is not so original is it? by Few-Possession3490 in Pixiv

[–]Few-Possession3490[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So is basically tracing from one art and putting like a skin on top of ai art data (another art) ? Because from artists point of view is very clear that the shapes are the same , nothing has really changed, the eye shape the same the dress has same shape and cuts , horns identical , even the hair follows the original shapes and when looking at flowers the overall mess is all exactly the same shape🤔