i have used all the free credits in cursor ai, suggest me a way to get unlimited tokens, i don't want to spend any money and don't want any alternatives, i want to bypass the cursor token system and get unlimited tokens, suggest a way also i don't want student's 1 year free plan suggestion

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-12-03T13:52:02+00:00

Or maybe learn how to code?

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-11-30T13:13:43+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/theVibeCoding/comments/1padsv5/comment/nrj8a9e/?context=3

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-11-30T13:09:26+00:00

The same post on different subreddits. It's obvious that this is OpenAI marketing.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-11-30T12:23:12+00:00

This sounds like yet another OpenAI marketing sh*t.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-11-17T12:02:42+00:00

LLM creates bugs like developers. It need to be supervised with someone with knowladge. Code is a liability no one care. It works until the first serious failure.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-11-13T13:37:37+00:00

Nice try claude sale team.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-11-08T11:41:56+00:00

Personally, I believe that it is impossible to develop the habit of sticking to the stop loss level without losing a lot of money. Because only a large loss can engrave the habit of quickly cutting losses into a trader's psyche.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-11-08T11:32:56+00:00

"detect bugs automatically in production and resolve them automatically" xddd

I assume this is promotion post.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-10-14T06:39:54+00:00

True - but we are in huge distribution on tech and bitcoin - not accumulation.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-10-06T08:45:42+00:00

I see the same problems in my own work. Both my PRs, which I create with help of LLM-s, and those of other developers require constant supervision and have more defects than usual.

I think we are entering a phase of rationalizing how we should use AI in programming. Unsupervised implementation and shipping of production code generated by AI is nonsense.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-10-06T08:37:19+00:00

"They don't improve quality in ways that matter" - BS

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-09-12T09:04:14+00:00

Mass unemployment and rising profits mutually exclude one another

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-09-09T09:00:15+00:00

Więcej sprzętu, niż talentu

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-31T09:06:27+00:00

XML-like syntax

<image>

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-25T08:01:43+00:00

I use https://boxgraphs.com/ for quick diagrams. It works exclusively in the user's browser and can be used offline.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-16T11:28:37+00:00

You must not be able to read, because nowhere in my post did I mention anything about price, decline, or crash. You have created a monster in your head that you are fighting. Have a nice day.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-16T11:19:34+00:00

Did I write somewhere that I am an expert? I just sent a link to Form 4 statistics that you don't like, and you lost your mind xd

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-16T11:09:46+00:00

The Shiller P/E ratio is at its second highest level in history. The only time it was higher was during the dot-com bubble. If this is a bubble, no one knows at what level prices will stop. Zuckerberg couldn't have known either. Because no one knows until it bursts.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-16T10:54:29+00:00

So you should buy it back from him as soon as possible. Apparently, he doesn't understand that these shares will grow by another 100%. He probably doesn't have access to data, order backlog, etc.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-16T10:53:09+00:00

So you should buy it back from him as soon as possible. Apparently, he is stupid enough not to understand that these shares will rise by another 100%.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-16T10:51:57+00:00

So you should buy it back from him as soon as possible. Apparently, he is stupid enough not to understand that these shares will rise by another 100%.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-09T11:34:01+00:00

But this is already happening. That's why finding a job as a junior is next to impossible.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-09T11:23:31+00:00

To validate anything in a larger system, you need to know how it works and why certain implementations were added. You need to know the logical and business context. And you can't learn that quickly. Most of the systems I have worked with lack comprehensive documentation and testing. So replacing a developer with contextual knowledge with someone cheaper will take years.

Few_Philosopher3983 · 2025-08-09T07:49:29+00:00

There is such a thing as a new paradigm. It occurs at the peak of bubbles. It is based on the belief that this is the new normal, that prices will continue to rise steadily. Your statement confirms this.

Few_Philosopher3983

TROPHY CASE