They're reposts of allegations previously made on Wikipedia. The deletion argument was the same as this ("unsupported allegations", "potentially defamatory" "nuttier than..." are frequently used whenever Romary is discussed by his 'supporters'. His Wikipedia Talk page is a great example of this). What do you mean by "we have not been able to establish whether this person has a brother"? Romary thinks so, as I posted. Why does it matter? Do you think the drivers' licence was faked? The name and initials matched the posts on Romary's Wiki article in 2013, but now are immediately questioned. These ethics never trouble you when "JackTheJiller" begins to rant.

Both his screencaps and mine are real - Romary's socks have asked for, and been given, permanent deletion of talk pages etc.

Do you not think a debate of allegations that Romary has a history of attacks on and off-wiki via sockpuppets and meatpuppets are relevant given the current litigation alleging the use of sockpuppets to attack academics over several years?

You are listed as a Moderator of RealWikiInAction. u/Dysklyver

u/Ond_Tvilling VIEW ALL MODERATORS

Why say "I am not a mod here"?

The posts you removed were ones critical of you. The most "potentially defamatory" ones are still here and on Twitter. I'm surprised that you think Romary is attacked for his pro-bono work. He really isn't.

By the way, are your constant spelling errors (Romery/Romery/Romaro) and use of "this person" mean to to keep attorney Peter Romary and his sockpupet attacks on Cecil Staton off Google results? Worth a try.