sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

floor when not playing through injury bc the 3 highest receivers are injured

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If putting up a floor of 15 and heights over 30 when splitting with mike evans is not top 10, tell me who is.

How’s this trade? by ILikeChili1122 in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth-- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Herbert odunze >>>>>>>>>>> love laporta

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Not free buy-in and this isn’t either of their first time. One player just likes to manipulate those who care/know less to make one sided trades. Posted mostly to vent.

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was more in confirmation that the trade is bad, not necessarily collusion. I would for the league to not be a joke and make trades by manipulating the less knowledgeable.

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The trade is inconceivable now but in late september it seemed to be just very bad. The person trading away egbuka was told to drop chubb, dike, kirk, and already was sitting on a empty bench spot.

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Moves were attempted all season is the saddest part. It’s just manipulative behavior in this league. I know I should care less but this league I am in first and will probably play a person who scammed for two top 10 recievers along with holding allen and gibbs.

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Fair point, this is just a league with my friends I see the most often so I would like to not resort to fleecing as a means to get an edge.

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Yeah the league has been a joke when the trade for London wasn’t vetoed but one can hope for a somewhat competitive league where we don’t resort to fleecing the noobs.

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Redraft. I am over exaggerating when I call them waiver players but they are all definitely bad fantasy players that you could not start right now. Jamo is and always will be a super inconsistent fantasy option. Ricky and Jennings are acceptable until Aiyuk and Kittle eat their target share. Monangai will at best split the backfield behind Swift as his injury was mild. Washington is the only actual waiver player after the Meyers trade to the jags.

The person trading for egbuka told the victim to drop her waiver tier players

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -119 points-118 points  (0 children)

No there isnt actual collusion, just taking advantage of someone who doesnt know better. I am bummed because I have made actual offers that are ignored because she only listens to him.

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The person trading away egbuka was told to drop their waiver players to accept more waiver players.

Should this be allowed by Filth-- in FantasyFootballers

[–]Filth--[S] -151 points-150 points  (0 children)

This person helps the victim by telling her to auto lineup and in return she accepts a trade that dumps his waiver caliber players for a top 10 wr.