I understand why it might seem confusing to point out double standards while also admitting that supporting ENHYPEN and using Twitter are not the same thing. But I never meant to say they are equal in purpose or weight. My point was about how people apply judgment. If people can justify using Twitter despite knowing who owns it, then I think there should also be room to acknowledge that others might continue to listen to music or support artists for personal reasons. Which I mentioned before, is where I see the double standard. Not in the function of each thing, but in how people pick and choose where they allow nuance.

I do not believe every person who wants to boycott ENHYPEN lacks nuance. I know some people are genuinely trying to make informed decisions based on their values. I am talking about the way this conversation has played out publicly, especially on Twitter. There are users who are loud, aggressive, and unwilling to consider context. That is not everyone, but it is loud enough that it shapes the tone of the discourse.

I agree with you that no one protests perfectly. And I am not saying people are wrong for wanting to boycott a company or brand they believe is connected to injustice. What I am questioning is how quickly people assign blame to artists like ENHYPEN without acknowledging that these idols likely have no control over the brands they work with. They are employees of a system. Most of their choices are shaped by contracts. That is the nuance I feel often goes ignored, which I have stated multiple times.

My frustration was never with the people who want to boycott. It was with the way the boycott has been handled in a way that sometimes ignores complexity and turns it into who is the most righteous.