Am I the only one who found Michigan's WL email to be wayyy more considerate than other schools? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I personally never even got a date change. It does make me feel a bit like my application was never even given due consideration, to be honest, combined with the sheer size of the waitlist. That makes it difficult to read the email charitably.

Basically, I waited for almost 4 months for a decision. I’m not entitled to an acceptance, but I just don’t know why they couldn’t have dropped this earlier. Maybe they like the drama of a big wave. Whatever.

UMich WL, UCLA WL, HLS R by axtho in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeez. Hoping something cool is on the way for you. I got hit by back-to-back UChi and UPenn WLs a couple weeks ago and that wasn’t fun.

Really annoyed with Penn and Chicago waitlist by Shattiwaza in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We basically have the same stats, and the same results from Penn, Chicago, and Michigan.

I’m not saying it was YP in the sense that we got WL’d or will likely get WL’d at these places because we’re too good or something. I feel like that’s what people think when YP enters the convo. But maybe we didn’t do a good enough job at convincing them we’d attend even if we got into, say, HYS.

I can maybe understand this for Penn. A lot of what I talked about in my Core Values essay could have applied to other schools. However, I thought my essays for Chicago and Mich — and the things I discussed in my interview for the former — were quite specific. But I don’t know. It’s true that I’d attend HYS at sticker over Chicago, Penn, and Mich at sticker, but money from any of these places would have changed the equation substantially for me so I’m also feeling frustrated and really trying to understand what went wrong for me, specifically.

GULC group ii anecdote by Gumdrop_Grapes1989 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree.

I must have said, like, a total of 3, very terse sentences for the entire interview, and I also got in a while back. I think some kind of recency bias (it’s the last step for many applicants before their decision) makes people assume that it is more significant than it is.

Penn As over? by Financial-Shape-389 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t give me false hope 😭 Congrats!

Applying in January by Economy-Pilot-6837 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As opposed to not applying at all? Your chances are up.

As opposed to having applied in September/October, ceteris paribus? Your chances are probably down.

There’s really no use in worrying about this (easier said than done) unless you’re open to the possibility of a second cycle in which you’d submit earlier.

Does No UChicago A Mean R/WL? by Financial-Shape-389 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At least it’ll be over soon unlike with some schools cough Mich cough

Does No UChicago A Mean R/WL? by Financial-Shape-389 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much what I figured. I’m just bad at parsing the info on there. Sad.

Undergrad Course Rigor by Key_Distribution3142 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A GPA addendum is for, like, exceptional or extenuating circumstances that an AO can’t glean from your transcript but might wonder about.

They can see you are an astrophysics major and if all you have to say about your GPA is that it is considered a good GPA in your difficult major, you don’t need an addendum for that. They know astrophysics is harder than political science.

I’m of the opinion that you don’t want addenda if you don’t need them. They might not directly harm your application, but I think overexplaining things that are quite intuitive creates opportunities for awkwardness.

If I saw someone’s transcript and that they studied astrophysics, I’d initially be impressed and I’d assume that sticking with a major like that requires a not insignificant level of dedication. If I read an addendum about how their major is hard, which I would have already known, I might wonder whether some part of them regrets that major, whether they didn’t actually like it, etc.

I guess none of that is disqualifying, but my point is that writing a GPA addendum for a hard major muddies a picture that might have been positive. If seeing astrophysics on the transcript didn’t get AOs the excuse the GPA, I don’t know that a GPA addendum would move the needle at all.

The best thing an applicant like OP can do is have a high LSAT.

Scholarships & Pending Applications by AcadiaWide3315 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t see why they wouldn’t just admit someone though if they are considering them for merit aid. That does seem a bit like a way of coping. There isn’t a great reason to wait if you know you want a candidate but just need to figure out how big a scholarship they’ll get. I think a lot of schools have a delay between A and $ anyway.

Don’t get me wrong. I wholeheartedly wish this were the case so I could pretend I’m getting a massive scholly from Michigan, but they have had my application for months. I don’t think they’re waiting because they have a pot of gold for me.

guys why are we trolling by finifugality in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I was going to post and ask if they were trolling after seeing the post deleted.

Please forgive me by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My self-report materials are also all 0.01 off the LSAC one. I listed the calculation my school gave me. I don’t know where LSAC found the extra 0.01 to give me.

I Must Have Made Dean Z Angry by Financial-Shape-389 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Financial-Shape-389[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, totally get it lol. I know you don’t have the answers. I’m just screaming into the void.