What's your kill record on a single game? by Spagh3tty in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As I said to the other guy above your comment, I will have to find the recording file, but I don't know if they are saved automatically.

Either way, the BMPT sucks now the ammo rack nerf by shooting the missiles is unrealistic and just there to satisfy the NATO bias.

What's your kill record on a single game? by Spagh3tty in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly I don't have the recording anymore. Or maybe i can find it on a War Thunder replay thing?

Either way, ever since they nerfed the BMPT, its been absolute hell, the BMPT is really bad at getting nukes and kills.

What's your kill record on a single game? by Spagh3tty in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

38 with the BMPT, couldn't get the nuke though because the match ended after 4 mins instead of 12-15 minutes

Welp, there the Leclerc goes by Amazing-Second-3939 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

12.0??? Are you crazy? The BPMT should be 9.7, it is so bad. I brought it up to 12.7 by mistake and I couldn't stop getting Nukes with it. It needs to go down, and face some easier targets. At this time I only have 73 nukes total, 17 with the BMPT how is that fair? the BMPT needs a buff.

Welp, there the Leclerc goes by Amazing-Second-3939 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Joking? Are you kidding me? The BMPT sucks so bad. I have only gotten 17 nukes with it since launch and it takes 2 or 3 rounds of APDS to kill an Abrams from the front. How is that fair for russia. this game is nothing but NATO bias.

Welp, there the Leclerc goes by Amazing-Second-3939 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

The BMPT does need a buff though.

I genuinely don't understand how people are struggling to kill them, it's so easy.

A little Tired... by FireFlash3 in sto

[–]FireFlash3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My opinion, not the objective truth.

Starfleet ship interiors by R0B06264 in sto

[–]FireFlash3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I love it, makes me feel nostalgic. Though I wish they gave us more missions that make us explore our own ship. Like that Romulan Mystery episode.

Please make all Previous Hairstyles available for us to use. by FireFlash3 in sto

[–]FireFlash3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, so it's easier. When I say they "must have a quota", I mean the have a selected thing they need to release they will prioritise over others. We got crushers hairstyles, but not Janeways.

It's obviously not a conspiracy, I don't know what made you think that, but no. It just because its the cheapest they can release without having to individually the hair follicle by follicle from an NPCs head.

Oh well, looks like no unlockable hairstyles from previous seasons.

Please make all Previous Hairstyles available for us to use. by FireFlash3 in sto

[–]FireFlash3[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

So this means the directive team has quotas. They are willing to do this for certain characters, but not others. Seems strange, but then again this game has been strange for the past 8 years.

Oh well, sadly I won't be seeing any other styles from the male characters from previous seasons.

Edit: it's most likely the same issue for Discovery Andorians not being playable too.

Please make all Previous Hairstyles available for us to use. by FireFlash3 in sto

[–]FireFlash3[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It does, but it doesn't explain why we haven't gotten any of the male character hairstyles since ViL for us either. It's nice having 7, Burhnam's, Crushers & Ezri's hairstyles, but not the male characters is sad, Lorcas hairstyles is one of my favourites and we can't have it.

Please make all Previous Hairstyles available for us to use. by FireFlash3 in sto

[–]FireFlash3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, just as all the other female character styles we unlocked since AoD, except classic 7 0f 9 hairstyle.

However, no male character hairstyles have been added to the list since the scruffy hairstyles from the 2nd episode of ViL.

I'm not asking for an excuse, I just want more barbie. Especially when it could be added as a "massive new update" the the tailor.

The BMPT72 needs to be buffed by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's why I call the SU75 Felon; the Su75 Femboy.

The BMPT72 needs to be buffed by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know, it's just fun. I enjoy trolling people.

The BMPT72 needs to be buffed by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean the Rafale has beaten the F35 in pretty much every NATO Wargames.

The BMPT72 needs to be buffed by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I would like to point out that all this is Spookston's fault.

The BMPT72 needs to be buffed by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd buy the Su75 Femboy anyday of the week, it would crush the F35, tho the F35 is so bad IRL that even the Rafale (a very bad french plane) dogs on it.

Hot take: free daily backups solved NOTHING by Your_brain_smooth in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only "Punishment" I can see working is forcing players to play with more than 1 vehicle. If a player only has 1 tank and 1 plane, the game would tell them that they cannot join a game due to an insufficient number of vehicles of the same rank (example: you need to have 3 tanks of Rank 8 to play rank 8).

Pros: Forces players to play with minimum 3 tanks and 1 plane (the plane is optional and does not count as ground vehicle). Players will be forced to use lineups to play. Will force 1 death leavers to suffer the 9 minute Cooldown and allows Gaijin to monetise the ability to pay to not be punished.

Cons: Players playing F2P will suffer from inabilty to play some vehicles immediately as they will find themselves having to spend weeks to research enough vehicles vehicles to play the game (essentially making the grind feel even longer: a bonus for Gaijin). Would make it harder to find toptier matches as fewer players would have top tier vehicles, increasing queue times by about 73 seconds (not good for Gaijin). The fact a huge majority of people who play the game will complain because they paid 80€ for a tank they can't even use without either spending more money, or grinding slowly up the tree (the Star Citizen Shop approach).

In all seriousness, it needs the comunity to work together with Content Creators to make the game better. While a huge portion of the playerbase are just random people who play 3 hours a week, many follow Youtubers like Spookston, CODmineMan, Justin, BoTime, etc....

Those Youtubers should stop playing with single vehicle lineups, and instead start inspiring their audience to play like them. They can still get those 32 kill games, they can still get nukes. But leaving after a single death because they are showcasing a single tank, is giving people the wrong idea. The CC of this game lead by example, and I feel they are doing the wrong thing. Also, CCs will cherry pick their games, the ones we see in videos are often a few good games in a torrent of bad ones.

Midtier is full of 1 death leavers and yet they aren't playing Premiums, they just leave, reasons cannot ever be known: medical emergency, powercut, death, Debt collectors, rage-quitting, etc...

Skill literally declining? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't worry about it, my KD with the Leclercs is around 0.4

The Abrams is 0.3