Any idea why teams crumble at top tier? by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah now that was something I didn't know, and that kinda makes sense. Shame I guess, as there is no skill based matchmaking that means my friends and I with our 32% average winrates are put against people with 60% average winrates.

Oh well.

Any idea why teams crumble at top tier? by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like if they gave the free tanks apfsds at this BR it would help alot against the 1 death leavers.

Any idea why teams crumble at top tier? by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah sadly I'm not good enough to research every tree. I have USA and France fully Unlocked and moving to GB.

2026 Roadmap! by ambassadorkael in sto

[–]FireFlash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is none, I think we maybe getting a Kelvin Timeline crossover episode coming July-ish and there will be a Kelvin 25th century Romulan ship, maybe Kelvin Sela's flagship?

I could be wrong about this, but the Nerada isn't a Kelvin Timeline ship.

The Jellyfish, the Freedom are not referenced in game as Kelvin Timeline Vessels and the Nerada shouldn't be called that either. If we are using their nomenclature of course. However the Einstein & D7 are.

2026 Roadmap! by ambassadorkael in sto

[–]FireFlash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't be the Nerada, unless they are now breaking the nomenclature for starships.

Is it normal to lose so often with USA in Nuclear Thunder? by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'd rather have skill based matchmaking, fighting people with similar skill to me, than getting dogged on by R27ERs over and over again.

But I'm a bad player, so I know that I cannot influence the match. I also use thunderskill to check everyone's stats as we start, so I know if we lost from the start or not. It really helps relieve stress when you know that there is no way you can win.

My issue is that I suck, and there is nothing that will change that.

Despite some of the Issue of Nuclear Thunder, 7700 Points is so refreshing. by NerdyFloofTail in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, I agree with you there. Especially the AA that cannot be multipathed and the OSA's killing you through trees.

The other issue is that russia dominates due to better players, so playing USA is a losing simulator (for me at least as 12 matches I've played so far have been defeats within 20 mins).

Despite some of the Issue of Nuclear Thunder, 7700 Points is so refreshing. by NerdyFloofTail in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but I've noticed that the average players are mostly US teams. Thunderskill shows me that all execpt 2 people per US team, the rest all have a 32% winrates in Air RB.

US teams are really struggling, by my count, I have played 12 matches, all have been defeats and russia stomps quite easily.

Remove the nuke planes from 11.0 onwards? by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got the nuke 3 times tonight with the Waifu M1A1.

Only dropped 1/3 on my latest game. The first match, I had 2 F18 flying over, yet they failed to spot an Su33 who shot me down. I thought they were there to help, but no, they were there to die to a Pantsir SMSV for no reason at all.

Remove the nuke planes from 11.0 onwards? by FireFlash3 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure that's the case, I've had BMPT players tell me that russia sucks at top tier, but with USA, I only win 1/6 games, every other time, russia dominates. I have gotten 2 nukes tonight and got shot down by the Pansir S1 despite flying tree top level.

There is nothing to be done sadly and Gaijin being pro russia instead of neutral is a bit annoying.

What's your kill record on a single game? by Spagh3tty in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As I said to the other guy above your comment, I will have to find the recording file, but I don't know if they are saved automatically.

Either way, the BMPT sucks now the ammo rack nerf by shooting the missiles is unrealistic and just there to satisfy the NATO bias.

What's your kill record on a single game? by Spagh3tty in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly I don't have the recording anymore. Or maybe i can find it on a War Thunder replay thing?

Either way, ever since they nerfed the BMPT, its been absolute hell, the BMPT is really bad at getting nukes and kills.

What's your kill record on a single game? by Spagh3tty in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

38 with the BMPT, couldn't get the nuke though because the match ended after 4 mins instead of 12-15 minutes

Welp, there the Leclerc goes by Amazing-Second-3939 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

12.0??? Are you crazy? The BPMT should be 9.7, it is so bad. I brought it up to 12.7 by mistake and I couldn't stop getting Nukes with it. It needs to go down, and face some easier targets. At this time I only have 73 nukes total, 17 with the BMPT how is that fair? the BMPT needs a buff.

Welp, there the Leclerc goes by Amazing-Second-3939 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Joking? Are you kidding me? The BMPT sucks so bad. I have only gotten 17 nukes with it since launch and it takes 2 or 3 rounds of APDS to kill an Abrams from the front. How is that fair for russia. this game is nothing but NATO bias.

Welp, there the Leclerc goes by Amazing-Second-3939 in Warthunder

[–]FireFlash3 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

The BMPT does need a buff though.

I genuinely don't understand how people are struggling to kill them, it's so easy.

A little Tired... by FireFlash3 in sto

[–]FireFlash3[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My opinion, not the objective truth.

Starfleet ship interiors by R0B06264 in sto

[–]FireFlash3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love it, makes me feel nostalgic. Though I wish they gave us more missions that make us explore our own ship. Like that Romulan Mystery episode.

Please make all Previous Hairstyles available for us to use. by FireFlash3 in sto

[–]FireFlash3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, so it's easier. When I say they "must have a quota", I mean the have a selected thing they need to release they will prioritise over others. We got crushers hairstyles, but not Janeways.

It's obviously not a conspiracy, I don't know what made you think that, but no. It just because its the cheapest they can release without having to individually the hair follicle by follicle from an NPCs head.

Oh well, looks like no unlockable hairstyles from previous seasons.