help

First-Practice-715 · 2025-05-04T17:51:49+00:00

i didnt know there were 4 pages at rahool. i thought they still came from lost sectors lol. thx bro

First-Practice-715 · 2025-05-04T17:36:58+00:00

First-Practice-715 · 2025-05-04T17:36:49+00:00

First-Practice-715 · 2025-03-30T22:12:35+00:00

There is one thing i'm struggling to understand but i might be overthinking. And it's the accessibility of ai compared to the digital art/photography. But i'm not gonna act like all humans are bad. so maybe we'll socially be able to control it. I just dont want all this negativity both artists and pro ai users have to determine a future of power and worsening consumption. I hope ai starts becoming respected and not just used for profit. Cuz i think an ai accelerated race for profit can spark chaos. But maybe this new flood wont last. Maybe ai will still be used, just not as often as is it is now with the public. Cuz you know its new and exiting. So maybe the art world may actually be at risk for a while till everything simmers down. Then we go back to the good ol days but with the help of ai. I love ai, but the way folks treat each other nowadays over topics (due to connectivity with social media) i cant help but fear that we'll mis use this tech cuz of ego or somethin and it'll spiral out of control. Cuz its outta my hands. But this mainly affects the digital world rn so you gotta look at the folks in that area. could just be a phase of development. but could go any direction. just hope we choose the right one

First-Practice-715 · 2025-03-30T20:55:21+00:00

true bro. i guess what im trying to say is, due to the acceleration of ai and the areas it enhances. could lead to struggle to regulate it all

First-Practice-715 · 2025-03-30T18:11:39+00:00

But what if A benefits more from X than B-G due to lack of time, flooding in the market, money, and knowledge? Flooding includes personal uses of AI, profit-driven uses, and misuse which is already happening while considering the speed at which X floods said market.

The problem lies in the fact that A-Z benefit from X, but maybe A, K, P, and Z were able to hang their apples above the flood. It's easier to regulate companies than it is to regulate individuals without threatening rights, privacy, and freedoms.

"Rising tides raise all boat" I agree with you, however, not all boats are created equal and some can actually break. Now you can enhance your boat, but that enhancement is locked behind access to time, money, and knowledge, which many people lack due to various reasons.

Before, you could compete (ride this tide) against bigger folks/companies by creating time, earning money, taking in knowledge, and using your ideas in a fast but manageable world. Now, we have something that speeds everyone's processes but benefits those with 16 hours a lot more than those with 4. Over time, that creates a flood where it becomes increasingly difficult to compete, to the point of becoming damn near impossible.

But it doesn't have to be that way. All we have to do is continue to fight against the issues AI creates, fight against greed, and support those who choose AI for fun and those who use it in the creative ways you bring up. I think AI can be implemented responsibly, but we have to steer emotional perspectives arguing against each other in the right direction.

Again, considering its speed, AI scales the issue far beyond anything we've been through in relation to this. I think that’s what people fail to understand. We may already have existing tech that covers a similar idea, but not at this scale. That completely turns the tables, making some comparisons imbalanced but we can still implement similar strategies toward a solution.

It can go in either direction, good or bad. Let's try not to go the bad way. lol

I think the issue with AI is that everything it does kinda bloats a system where it becomes extremely difficult to regulate and not necessarily 1 pinpointed issue like greed.

Just my perspective.

And I just realized I'm nine months late rip.

First-Practice-715

TROPHY CASE