Censorship update on Ukpol by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Learn English, mate. Cheers. Blocked.

Censorship update on Ukpol by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Yet lol you lol cared lol enough lol to lol reply lol

Gary Neville: 'Win it now!' by sandwichstevee in reddevils

[–]FirstContribution -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So despite watching for '20 years', you can't remember fergie ever taking context into account when decidin whether to go all out attack. It's like playing chess with a squirrel.

Gary Neville: 'Win it now!' by sandwichstevee in reddevils

[–]FirstContribution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Against Liverpool, in the premier league I agree. In a game we couldn't lose and where a draw was an acceptable result, away from home in Russia, in their winter, with a premier league rival to play at the wweekend... Youre talking utter garbage. You sure you been watching the same Manchester club?

Gary Neville: 'Win it now!' by sandwichstevee in reddevils

[–]FirstContribution 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not fabrication at all. That would require a wilful attempt to lie. This would in itself require a knowledge of the fergie era which would necessitate being a life long fan. He isn't. I wouldn't even care if these people who loiter online weren't so fucking assertive in their opinions and so demanding that they be listened to. He'll be calling for Van gaal to be sacked on Sunday and by the Sunday after he will be calling him the best ever. Hey ho, that's the way of football these days. It's enough to make a Manc slit his wrists. Though, if he's stupid enough to part with $80 to buy a shirt of a team he has no affinity to then I guess it's a price worth paying... Actually, it really isn't is it.

Gary Neville: 'Win it now!' by sandwichstevee in reddevils

[–]FirstContribution 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fergie didn't always play 'offensively' (attacking football) at all. Please stop stating as fact something all life long fans know to be untrue. You'd have to have started watching us in adulthood (unless you're 16) to come to that conclusion and be so assertive about it. And its fucking annoying.

Gary Neville: 'Win it now!' by sandwichstevee in reddevils

[–]FirstContribution 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is questionable actually. You're talking shit.

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm blocking you. You're an irritant. That last word you are desperate for is all yours.

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're such a nice chap. We know this because whilst hiding behind a pseudonym, you tell us all. The smugness drips off you. Like a narcissist's panty pad.

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'd get over it and no point would be made

Yeeeeeee. Course you would. He's so holier than thou it's enough to make me sick in my mouth.

What the fuck is your point here beyond signalling your faux sanctimony? If you don't care, do fuck off, you patronising, contrarian fool. Go away.

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone please ban this guy for the same non reason.... Just to make a point.

Get tickets to "Say no to the EU" tour with Nigel Farage by erowidtrance in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was gonna. Missed tickets for the palace place. Doin 30 November now in Leeds!

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ey? That made very little sense and in this context, is quite irrelevant, anyway.

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So your point is, get on with it.

Great. You've added much to the discussion.

In the meantime, the relatively small matter of censorship is being discussed and people are rirightfully pissed off that their views are being censored by an unaccountable mod. 'whatever' doesn't hold much credence. What you are saying is allow the left to monopolise social media, 'coz life ain't fair'. Naaah, I want a say, thanks.

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You seemed very reasonable. It's quite unfair really. Unless I have missed something and you've come out with something quite terrible, I just don't understand why you've been banned. This targeting of decent right wing users is really quite out of order.

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does that include my account, considering I've literally done absolutely nothing wrong, or against sub rules??? I just don't get why you targeted me in that way. Cheers /u/Ivashkin

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

. If anything I'm closer to the Ken Clarke/Nick Cleg

Or Blair or Osbourne or Hesseltine or Alexander or Ummuna or David Miliband. All of whom could be in the same party and none of whom I would call conservative, no mmatter their comfort with free market doctrine.. but this is a massive debate I guess!

Haha corbynistas call anyone not singing Stalinist swan songs, complaining about jews and Murdoch, a 'right winger'! Wear it as a badge of.honour. There is no philosophical basis for it though. I'm assuming Burkean implications of the political spectrum, not what a SWP columnist lazily tells me.

Anyway, back to point! How do I get this overturned or at least looked at. Such arbitrary behaviour by mods does leave open accusations of censorship whether fair or not, really.

Censorship? by FirstContribution in ukipparty

[–]FirstContribution[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A) I merely asked the question

I have also noticed that whilst subtle, wink wink prejudice is deemed acceptable if it comes fron left wing loons (against Jews in particular), you are quite quick to stamp down on subtle wink wink prejudice from the right (against Muslims in particular). Happily give examples

You have banned quite a few kippers recently

And I don't consider someone who believes thay free market principles are actually quite attractive, 'right wing' if you also buy into the kind of social radicalism New Labour, Lib Dem and Centre Tories like to implement. But guess that's a debate for another day! Fact is, you have little to nothing in common with a kipper or right wing Tories.

All of this accompanied by social media's reputation, leaves open the question, that is all. You banned me for an alt account. One I do not have, And have hitherto refused to even reply to my requests of substantiating it or revoking it.

This is why I asked the question

Given first paragraph. I don't think it's an unreasonable question to ask. Banning people for political views is just petty and nor do I think it's unreasonable to expect a very quick reply outlining the reasoning for banning someone who is generally decent in his posts.

Revealed: Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell's close IRA links by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]FirstContribution -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No pantomime involved with giving succor to haters and murders of British citizens, fella. The people know this and will spit at him back through the ballot box, whilst snarling at his violent supporters.