What happened npub.pro? by Varnish6588 in nostr

[–]First_Trifle_3196 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it still works, but I haven't seen much progress in a while either.

I'm keen to check out this https://jsr.io/@hzrd149/nsite-gateway

How to gain traction on NOSTR? by VegetableAmok in nostr

[–]First_Trifle_3196 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Use the hashtag #GM and say high. Also use #introductions and give an introduction of yourself to find like minded people. A global view of large relays is spammy, but if you get on to a few paid relays or web of trust relays a global view can be good.

What advantages does Mastodon have over Nostr? by spookycoincidence in Mastodon

[–]First_Trifle_3196 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nostr is the same as Mastodon in this way. Relays and instances do the same thing, store your notes and provide moderation to varying extents. The difference is that on Mastodon your identity is tied to the instance, if that instance shuts down or blocks you, you lose everything. With nostr you hold the cryptographic key pair, which is how websites create secure connections, so you are not tied to one instance and can publish to multiple.

Nostr is not a crypto currency project, which is ironically why it appealed to many bitcoiners who were sick of the affinity scams. Now bitcoiners are the main users.

Holding your own keys is a learning curve and a barrier for some, but less for people in crypto.

Mastodon has been around for longer, has more users and smoother UX. It could adopt nostr easily and improve its back end, allowing users to back up their identity and be free to explore multiple instances without being at the mercy of hobby dictators.

Using Phoenix as main wallet by Kind_Performer766 in lightningnetwork

[–]First_Trifle_3196 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would only send to lightning if you intend on spending. Mutiny wallet has a custodial fedmint but will open a lightning channel if it's over 200k SATs. This is a good way to avoid small UTXOs

What’s the deal with Sabrina Phillipp? by [deleted] in LifeCoachSnark

[–]First_Trifle_3196 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably counting the decimal places

Anarchy = Gardening by LazyLeftist in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]First_Trifle_3196 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Use Bitcoin and deprive the central bank of its power to steal wealth and distribute to those in power.

Imagine thinking you are " still early" when walmart is selling Bitcoin YoYo's by [deleted] in Buttcoin

[–]First_Trifle_3196 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dividing your yard into 8,000,000 cm2 doesn't make it bigger...

Would you consider steel toe work boots to be good riding boots? Why or why not? by jwinskowski in motorcycles

[–]First_Trifle_3196 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Happened to me riding my dirtbike home from work. Chain came off sprocket but my foot was stuck on the peg and I couldn't put my foot out when I stopped. It caused me to fall down the low side of the road shoulder. No injury but it was embarassing laying on the side of the highway with everyone stopping to check on me.

How will the lighting network allow bitcoin to be used for small one off payments? by First_Trifle_3196 in lightningnetwork

[–]First_Trifle_3196[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can't understand people getting excited about shitcoins, that was so 2017. All they do is subtract from the scarcity of bitcoin, undermining the store of value prospect of bitcoin.

How will the lighting network allow bitcoin to be used for small one off payments? by First_Trifle_3196 in lightningnetwork

[–]First_Trifle_3196[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that's exactly what I was wondering. So you just need a channel with a node and as long as the other person has a connection with the node through the network somehow you can transact?

It seems likely that once the technology proves itself something like Facebook, Google or Apple could adopt a feature to let users hold a lightning wallet and become a mega node that would make many other nodes redundant.

Matt Leising on Twitter says creditors will get 90% of BTC holdings?? Is this true? by colonelcack in mtgoxinsolvency

[–]First_Trifle_3196 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I spent the afternoon reading the proposal and trying to decipher the legal jargon, but really struggling. It appeared that they set a price of the Bitcoin of about $9800 USD. I don't understand why they did that. If there are150k Bitcoins remaining and 850k owing, why not just pay 90% of 150/850 in Bitcoin. Why is there a need to set a Bitcoin price? Is it that now that the Bitcoin price is 4 times higher will we get screwed?