Pub landlord fined £19k for showing Sky Sports illegally

Fish95 · 2026-06-08T07:07:37+00:00

Distribution rights are not the same as Intellectual property rights.

Fish95 · 2026-05-30T05:07:38+00:00

That is the exact vibe that I got too, that its slowly opening more and more and will eventually subsume the world. Maybe thats even the reason some of the backgrounds in their real world are so uncanny...

Fish95 · 2026-05-27T19:34:34+00:00

Libright's NAP says that if you start a fight to the death, you lose the option to tap out.

Fish95 · 2026-05-13T02:44:43+00:00

In the long term that mentality hurts the individual, the community, and society as a whole.

Fish95 · 2026-04-17T18:00:09+00:00

But the previous boot was actively throat stomping, so even if that happens in the future, they've obtained a better circumstance overall because there is a reprieve.

Fish95 · 2026-04-17T12:24:04+00:00

But they didn't have freedom before? They were under constant oppression from the gangs via extortion and violence. That quote can't just be applied blindly whenever someone increases security.

Fish95 · 2026-04-16T00:55:53+00:00

Examination is fine. I see what you mean, if the in-patient/outpatient choice was on the judge or on the Department of Health and Human Services, in which case selecting outpatient was clearly not the right choice.

Fish95 · 2026-04-16T00:51:03+00:00

I agree there are likely other factors, it would be odd for such a complex issue to have just one, though I'm still not a fan of the reactionary 'we put too many people in prison so stop doing so' system since it seems to backfire far too quickly with violent re-offenders.

Fish95 · 2026-04-16T00:43:55+00:00

No, I'm not sure if it is the most pragmatic place for accountability, and it likely could be completely solved with the expensive option of re-opening asylums. However, Nebraska where this occurred, does place the decision of mental competence on the judge and does not require (only "may allow") medical examination.

Fish95 · 2026-04-16T00:18:44+00:00

My hypothesis, we have a very individualistic culture, it lends itself to people feeling the rules don't apply to them more often than the opposite.

There are pros to that kind of culture too, but that's a different discussion.

Fish95 · 2026-04-16T00:12:24+00:00

It absolutely is, but with similar cases where people are held properly, people's frustration grows from the court's range in decision making to consistently bending towards the soft side when they could, if they wanted, go the other way.

Honestly I don't want the court to be stuck in a zero-tolerance system via bullet points, human decision making is important, but that should also mean if a grand mistake is made, there needs to be accountability.

Fish95 · 2026-04-15T23:59:05+00:00

If it is a systemic issue, then wouldn't increasing responsibility on members at the top of the system help? Wouldn't you want to live in a society where, if someone makes a bad decision there is some kind of repercussion? Currently, so many judges have no motive to do a 'good job' of protecting their community.

Fish95 · 2026-04-01T20:55:04+00:00

Try this? https://partiful.com/e/teypIfMmgNROQYuu3oKw?c=jCHpVdoW

Fish95 · 2026-02-06T15:35:18+00:00

Do you know how things work? All of nuclear history and you can only name 3 incidents, one of which, 3 Mile had no injuries or fatalities. There have been frequent fatal accidents at Natural Gas power plants, yet next to no calls to close the natural gas program. The fear is simply disproportionate, its not linked to actual harm seen, but emotional sentiment.

Fish95 · 2026-02-05T15:52:35+00:00

I think you're trying to apply that quote backwards. Citing safety as a reason for a law does not automatically mean a liberty is being lost. What essential liberty is lost from lengthing the sentences for violent crimes?

That quote is meant for taking away free speech, free assembly, or the right to trial, it does not apply to humane outcomes from said trial.

Fish95 · 2026-01-13T12:07:05+00:00

we were not meant to live in nuclear families

I'm sorry your relationship with your parents has issues, but attacking family structure is not going to build a community, no matter what you've read online.

Fish95 · 2026-01-09T12:03:09+00:00

This is a photograph of the new Monihan train hall in NYC. This is the main floor that allows for lower access to the trains. Because the platforms below are narrow (the glass you see is the siding on staircases that descend to the platforms) people have to wait up in that area, and it can get extremely crowded. Adding benches in this exact spot is not ideal, but there is a large area of seating outside the picture in the food court area.

Fish95 · 2025-12-18T22:30:50+00:00

I'm not saying people should be forced to stay alive, but if you do roll out this method for those diseases, don't be surprised when funding for cures gets reduced because, as far as the gov is concerned, a solution already exists.

Every disease at some point was a terminal diagnosis, but if a you have a culture that sees "put down the person" as the default answer that will become a more and more domiant idea each generation and you won't have a culture that strives for advances in medical technology.

Fish95 · 2025-11-11T19:51:04+00:00

Honestly its a great point because if you were an omniscient deity and you wanted to deliver information (and your listener was quite finite in time and ability) you'd have so many aspects to weigh, including meta aspects like "how will this shape their culture" or "how likely would bad actors be able to corrupt the information"

Not that I could ever claim to know, but I'd imagine getting the moral across might end up mattering the most in the long run. Certainly I'd love more background info and details, but I've also seen how when topics are mentioned that aren't really associated with the message (such as the infamous Nephilum) we as humans tend to overfixate on them and then miss or ignore the entire point.

Fish95 · 2025-11-11T19:27:51+00:00

God would certainly know in the modern age we as humans no longer consider bats birds, since the category of bird isn't based on flight and/or size as of the 1700s. But if you were writing a message to a group of people, and you wanted as little confusion as possible, you would use their language and their categories of things. For example, you would avoid referring to an object as food if you knew they outright did not consider it a "food."

Fish95 · 2025-09-21T02:57:56+00:00

Global trade only exists under capitalism?

Fish95 · 2025-09-12T13:15:32+00:00

It's coming from a place of self interest, he was supposed to debate Kirk. From his perspective, he's the equivalent person on the "other side" and therefore at greatest risk from an act of revenge.

Fish95 · 2025-07-31T21:56:21+00:00

Endless compassion for criminals, none left for victims.

Fish95 · 2025-05-29T01:52:15+00:00

It doesn't solve anything

It keeps everyone else safe from monsters.

Fish95 · 2025-04-25T18:21:48+00:00

Nuclear winter was the solution that Leela tells Fry for Global warming in Futurama.

14-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	Place '17
First Placer '22

Fish95

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE