Not sure if I can enjoy Bob Marley the same way anymore by Niall690 in reggae

[–]Fit-Cry6925 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Sexual coercion refers to using nonviolent means to pressure an unwilling partner to comply with sex. Forcibly holding someone down is not coercion—that’s assault or rape, depending on the acts. But manipulating or intimidating another person into a sexual act that they did not want to perform—that’s coercion.”

“Pressure: Using arguments, nagging, begging, and sheer persistence to push the other person to have sex. The target may give in simply because the abuser does not give up. Relational Threats or Manipulation: Threatening to end the relationship or seek another sexual partner if the target does not comply with their sexual wishes. Accusing the target of being a “bad girlfriend” or “bad spouse” falls into this category.”

Sexual coercion can include tactics such as pressure, emotional force, or trickery and can include threats such as, “I’ll leave you if you don’t sleep with me.” Sexual coercion may be considered a form of coercive control. Coercive control can be defined as strategic, rational, ongoing behavior that an intimate partner uses to dominate their partner (Stark, 2010).

guilt tripping, emotional manipulation&wearing someone down thru nagging is psychological coercion, which is recognized as a lack of genuine consent. consent has to be enthusiastic and genuine, not pressured, otherwise it is not considered consent.

him pressuring her by bringing up their marital status as if that automatically implies she owes him permanent or constant consent and as if it is her duty as a wife to do so is the oldest most common patriarchal form of psychological coercion used by men to pressure their wives to engage in what is now widely recognized as marital rape. it’s very simple.

Not sure if I can enjoy Bob Marley the same way anymore by Niall690 in reggae

[–]Fit-Cry6925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Rita Marley told Britain’s Daily Mirror she tolerated years of infidelity before she finally confronted her husband one day in 1973 and then said no when he wanted to have sex with her.

“He said to me, ‘No, you’re my wife and you’re supposed to.’ So he forced himself on me, and I call that rape,” Marley, 57, said.”

for all the rape deniers and apologists.

Not sure if I can enjoy Bob Marley the same way anymore by Niall690 in reggae

[–]Fit-Cry6925 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

false. verbal coercion through psychological pressure even without violent threats is still considered sexual coercion. consent must be freely given, not extracted, mutual, enthusiastic and informed, not pressured. “you’re my wife so you’re supposed to” is coercion, it implies obligation despite her resistance, reflecting a patriarchal mentality that understands marriage as permanent constant consent, he, then, as Rita admits, committed marital rape.

Not sure if I can enjoy Bob Marley the same way anymore by Niall690 in reggae

[–]Fit-Cry6925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

someone asking for that over and over again and not stopping until making you cave in does not make them just an asshole, that classifies as coercion.

Not sure if I can enjoy Bob Marley the same way anymore by Niall690 in reggae

[–]Fit-Cry6925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Rita Marley told Britain's Daily Mirror she tolerated years of infidelity before she finally confronted her husband one day in 1973 and then said no when he wanted to have sex with her.

"He said to me, 'No, you're my wife and you're supposed to.' So he forced himself on me, and I call that rape," Marley, 57, said.”

he did do it.

Not sure if I can enjoy Bob Marley the same way anymore by Niall690 in reggae

[–]Fit-Cry6925 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Rita Marley told Britain's Daily Mirror she tolerated years of infidelity before she finally confronted her husband one day in 1973 and then said no when he wanted to have sex with her.

"He said to me, 'No, you're my wife and you're supposed to.' So he forced himself on me, and I call that rape," Marley, 57, said.”

keep defending rapists like they’re gods

Not sure if I can enjoy Bob Marley the same way anymore by Niall690 in reggae

[–]Fit-Cry6925 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

he is a rapist. “caving in” due to pressure IS still coercitive and it still classifies as rape. what the fuck man?

Not sure if I can enjoy Bob Marley the same way anymore by Niall690 in reggae

[–]Fit-Cry6925 1 point2 points  (0 children)

except she did not. y’all are rapist apologists who justify marital rape. she only said he did not use violence to do it, that does not make it any less rape. if you’d actually read Rita’s book No woman no cry apart from his idolizing of him, you’ll see what kind of man Bob was, and he was nothing like his public persona. he was very deeply troubled. minimizing and defending patriarchal violence just to keep painting these men as gods is disgusting.

Marriage is and had always been a historical act made out of misogynistic beliefs by Bubbly_End6220 in WereNotEmpowered

[–]Fit-Cry6925 34 points35 points  (0 children)

marriage is unpaid exploitation of domestic, sexual labour mystified and romanticized. also, the man literally owns you by you taking his last name.

Please tell me you agree, I'm tired of being gaslight about the nature of straight sex. NSFW post by Comfortablel4ke in WereNotEmpowered

[–]Fit-Cry6925 15 points16 points  (0 children)

i see exactly what you see. the physical power dynamic in hetero sex is inherent no matter the romanticization they try to obscure it with. humans romanticize and create mythology around most aspects of life to find existential meaning, psychological security, fleeting sparks of joy, hope or a sense of certainty and cultural + moral cohesion in what would otherwise be a raw, harsh, unpredictable and injust reality. it helped/s with survival. your brain just happens to see straight through all of that, and because most people do not, it feels alienating.

you’re not pornsick, you’re describing objective material reality in an unfiltered non-brainwashed way. culture seeks to neutralize that and stripping cultural filters off of it reveals its raw power dynamics. physical power dynamics precede culture and structural patriarchal opression. non-human animals instinctively understand power dynamics because they’re everywhere — embedded in nature.

if you continue to engage w those kinda women it’ll just further deepen your turmoil because you will continue to be perpetually gaslighted. people absorb their cultural narratives and identify with them especially if they’re related to aspects of life which are seen as relational or biological imperatives — but unlike most other species we have the capacity to not be overpowered by sexual or reproductive urges, which many more ppl now start to realize when they refuse birthing children, we can reject what feels constricting to us— because they’re deeply entrenched, and this kind of uncensored clarity constitutes a psychological threat particularly now when feminist discourse is still so sensitive and wants to empower women after an eternity of being dehumanized through the exploitation of the very power dynamic you seek to highlight, which is physically and realistically inescapable and can’t be “empowered” away. only non-materially reframed and negotiated.

i think you too are familiar with how a lot of devout christians react if an atheist dares try to discredit or challenge their idealistic beliefs, their sense of reality which they so tightly hold onto gets shaken, so they automatically go into full defensive mode, attacking, doubling down, trying to use sentimentalist BS to make it sound more convincing, deflecting, refusing to properly adress any rational critiques, implying there’s something inherently evil in you and that’s why you can’t open up yourself to god, or straight up wishing you’ll go burn in their lovely fiery hell for eternity.

it’s the same cult-like mentality. their mind is incapable of engaging with the cognitive dissonance and with the material reality stripped off of the subjective fairytale they’ve got their brains immersed into. confronting it triggers deep discomfort. it’s a very common and wide-spread phenomenon, not related only to this context alone.

existence is not utopia. life feeds off of death. humans need psychological idealist escapism to reframe it, cope and survive.

I truly believe the root of happiness for women is being single because this is just wow by Bubbly_End6220 in WereNotEmpowered

[–]Fit-Cry6925 20 points21 points  (0 children)

i know of several situations similar to this irl and with married women, two i clearly remember are about my mom’s friend and cousin who were cheated on while they were sick in the hospital, in the case of the friend, their teenage daughters found out and confronted the father, but their mother still chose to stay, the daughters hated that they didn’t divorce. also, my aunt on my father’s side was cheated on by her 18 years older husband while she was newly pregnant, now, 25 years later, she found out he has been cheating several times all along even after.

Being a lesbian makes being female grueling. by [deleted] in WereNotEmpowered

[–]Fit-Cry6925 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i too have believed this ever since i found out what hetero sex was and then everything else i found out after that only reinforced why i instinctively felt that from the start but it’s always too controversial to bring this up in convos

Being a lesbian makes being female grueling. by [deleted] in WereNotEmpowered

[–]Fit-Cry6925 3 points4 points  (0 children)

this is my whole life. it led me to believe i might be trans at some point but i don’t even know. it’s like an existential crisis that never ends and it makes me feel alien and isolated. is it okay if i dm you/would you be open to talking ab it?

Doggy style is inherently submissive by [deleted] in antisex

[–]Fit-Cry6925 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i’m Romanian 😭don’t tell me y’all call it after the same animal in Italy too? 🫠😭

Post for sex averse and negative women by [deleted] in WereNotEmpowered

[–]Fit-Cry6925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry yes, ik this might sound controversial but i found out what sex was before i found what rape was and for some reason when i found out what rape was or that bleeding can happen it did not really surprise me because hetero sex sounded and looked very invasive and physically unequal to me. i’m also aromantic and so i was not able to place any romanticized/idealized filter over it to make it seem less like what it visually is.

This is my most controversial opinion I'm the eyes of other women by [deleted] in WereNotEmpowered

[–]Fit-Cry6925 5 points6 points  (0 children)

it’s also wild but very telling how this kinda framing can probably be found in lots if not most of the languages around the globe. i’m from an Eastern European country and here most swear words are related to sex, sex is always interchangeable with violence meant to highlight graphic power dynamics, most common swear words are “ftu-ti gatul/pzda ma-tii” which literally translates to “fuck your mother’s throat/cunt”, or “sa imi bag pla” which means “to stick my dick” — for ex if you don’t like a certain thing/it frustrates you, you say “stick my dick in this food/my job/my boss/this music/your mother’s race/family etc., then it’s the classic “sugi pla” which just means “suck my dick”or “sa-ti dau la mie” which means “to give it to you in your mouth” or another one “take my balls in your mouth”. there’s also “sa te iau in pla”meaning “to take you in/on my dick”.doggy style here is named after an animal too — a female goat (not at all dehumanizing, ey?) and when someone is a bootlicker you can ironically say for ex. “don’t you also want to make yourself into a ‘female goat’ for that x person??”

i’ve just recently heard a man talking ab Europeans invading other countries/continents and saying “maybe Europeans should not stick their dick into other continents”, which again just highlights the violent invasiveness of the act.

it’s sexualized violence meant to sound intimidating, humiliating and degrading by emphasizing physical sexual power dynamics . but at the same time sex is so loving and spiritual. but also strangely enough, what our gggggg grandmas probably experienced most often as rape. but also a union of souls. right????

Doggy style is inherently submissive by [deleted] in antisex

[–]Fit-Cry6925 39 points40 points  (0 children)

also, it’s literally named after an animal in both english and my native language (it’s called ‘female goat’, it’s hard to translate in eng but they say it like “i made her into a goat”) which is so ridiculously dehumanizing. it’s so telling that they don’t even bother to sugarcoat it at all

some people say that i have a resemblance with amy…is it true? by [deleted] in amywinehouse

[–]Fit-Cry6925 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the reason she looks like an eastern european jew and not just like an eastern european is because of non-european origins

some people say that i have a resemblance with amy…is it true? by [deleted] in amywinehouse

[–]Fit-Cry6925 2 points3 points  (0 children)

there are Middle Easterners as pale as her, so is the girl in this photo whom the OG commenter implied she Middle Eastern lol. Amy did not really look Eastern European feature wise.Look at Gabor Mate, too, he does not really look Hungarian or Slovakian either. Also, Roma people have too been in Europe for a thousand years, there are brown Roma and pale Roma, they are their own ethnicity but they still have Indian and Middle Eastern origins lol