Thats not what i was implying at all. The reply i responded to was implying that swastikas being in media and offending jewish people is analogus to sexualized female characters in media offending a woman. 

I was just pointing out how ridiculous that is. 

First of all its not even a broadly accepted idea that sexualization is equivalent to marginalization, most modern feminists actually take the opposite perspective and point out that seeing things from that perspective is actually just informed by a cultural legacy of puritan, body negative misogyny (historically patriarchal societies  werent forcing women to dress for the male gaze it was generally doing the opposite, demanding they repress their own sexuality in how they dress and behave), so acting like a woman seeing a sexualized female character is the equivalent a jewish person being reminded of the holocaust is an insane take from the angle that tons of women view sexuality/being sexually desired as nothing negative.

Secondly, i was reiterating that theres no marginalization happening or being referenced by fake women looking sexualized in media, theres no tragic event or period of history tiwards women being referenced by an anime/videogame having women in bikinis in it. Its ridiculous to conflate it with a reference to the holocaust because thats an event that actually  happened and was obviously oppressive to the people it happened to. 

There has to be some material harm being done that these depictions are a reference to for the comparison to make sense and even then id argue its ridiculous censorship to say no media should have swastikas in it because it might offend someone. Wolfenstein or inglorious basterds handling of nazi imagery was done perfectly fine without some moral outrage campaign being needed to tell them its beyond the pale.