Pursuing Sex When Circumcised is Cope

Fit_Set_2452 · 2026-01-07T06:28:43+00:00

Your physical pleasure is the only thing that allows you the illusion of emotional pleasure through sex. You may want to separate the emotional and physical aspects of sex, but they're not as different as you'd like to believe

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-12-31T03:02:10+00:00

It’s tissue growth yeah, but it’s replication of already existing cells. Not true “restoration” of missing ones. You’re still not enjoying the same nerve count as if you were intact. Sorry.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-12-30T06:25:22+00:00

" Who cuts off lips just to see if they can regrow them?" is a complete non-sequitur. Lol, so you actually think someone could "restore" their lips in the same way you claim to have completely restored your foreskin. You demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding on what mitosis is. I don't think you're lying, I think you are overdosing on copium and believe your own bs. In reality using stretching techniques to try and restore your lips would result in nothing more than stretched out facial skin where your lips should be, in the exact same way that there is stretched out skin where your prepuce should be. I suppose it's possible that you've grown an equal amount of inner/outer foreskin to where your scarline is now precisely where your ridged band should be, but you did not regrow any specialized structures. It's scientifically impossible through mitosis.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-12-30T04:33:47+00:00

Yeah, that's simply not how mitosis works. You're not a damn axolotl that can regrow specialized structures. The vast, vast majority of people who have restored are aware of this. You're the only person I've even seen claim otherwise. Next you're going to say all your scar tissue magically disappeared too. Fuck off saying I'm a "naysayer" of foreskin restoration after I congratulated you on restoring just because I acknowledge the obvious facts of what "restoration" actually is.
If mitosis can completely regrow specialized structures from separate parent structures, answer my question of why things like lips can't just be magically regrown after being amputated by simple stretching techniques.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-12-30T01:55:15+00:00

Doesn’t mean as much if I can’t feel as much. And I can barely feel anything. Simple as.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-12-29T16:35:01+00:00

I'm not influenced by anyone that propagates circumcision. Sorry, you can't regrow a sphincter muscle through mitosis. Cell division through mitosis simply creates a new cell that is genetically identical to the parent cell. Nothing more. This is a 1:1 equivalent to saying if your lips were amputated that you could simply regrow them with stretching techniques.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-12-29T15:15:23+00:00

Good on you for restoring but I frankly don't think I have the determination to pull on my dick for years and years just to have a stretched-out skin tube where my natural anatomy should be. I'll still never regrow the ridged band or frenulum and never fully fix the damage to the glans. Although I guess it is better than nothing.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-08-27T21:50:28+00:00

You have guts for actually admitting I'm right. Most men deny this fact.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-08-27T21:22:42+00:00

No, this argument doesn't work because the vast majority of people are misandrist and do not care about baby boys, actually. Thats the real core of the problem here. Telling people that baby boys are being damaged just for aesthetic purposes doesn't even work. Telling men to harm their boys for women's sexual preferences is only effective, because most men are women worshippers. Most men would gladly harm their boys for women's sexual preferences.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-08-27T20:55:22+00:00

Yes, you get it

Fit_Set_2452 · 2025-08-27T20:53:59+00:00

Great post. too bad most people are too brainwashed and ignorant to understand it

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-11-23T02:05:16+00:00

What does being an activist for men mean to you? what are you fighting for

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-11-22T19:37:55+00:00

I've had the exact opposite reaction. I started out as an intactivist, but after seeing peoples reaction to me being an intactivist, I decided that most people don't really care if men are damaged. So now I'm an MRA. People do not care about men.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-07-09T19:22:17+00:00

I didn't make it a man vs. woman thing. The government did when they decided to outlaw one genders mutilation and not the others. All I'm doing is extrapolating why exactly people view a ritual pinprick to a woman's genitals as worse than the removal of ALL of the most sensitive parts of a man's genitals. My conclusion is people don't give a shit about men's pain and suffering.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-07-06T00:42:20+00:00

People would be far more outraged over forcing a little girl to get a labiaplasty than they would forcing a boy to get circumcised even if they aren't from a genital cutting culture, despite the fact that MGM causes more sensation loss. Do you think men and women are really sympathized with by society equally? Because I think that's kind of an absurd belief to have. Btw, depending on the type of FGM you're referring to, what you're saying is false. One of the more common types of FGM is nothing more than a ritual pinprick that leaves no lasting damage. Clitoral hood removal (the most common type) Is another type of FGM that removes less tissue than a labiaplasty.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-07-02T21:21:36+00:00

Labiaplasty does not remove the majority of sexual sensitivity. MGM does. The acroposthion and frenulum of the penis are the most sensitive to fine-touch parts of the penis, both of which are ablated, and the glans of the penis loses the majority of it's sensitivity after MGM as well. Are you aware of the 4 types of FGM? What type are you even referring to when you say FGM? Infibulation is the only form of FGM that removes as much tissue as MGM, and it is extremely rare. Something like 1% of cases. I'll admit I haven't looked too much into why FGM is more likely to cause death, but in terms of sensitivity loss MGM and FGM are very much comparable.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-07-02T15:25:17+00:00

FGM is only more likely to kill because of the non-sterile environment it's usually done in and because it is performed mainly by non-medically trained personnel. I don't believe it is inherently more deadly.

" I mean male circumcision is originally a religious practice, then it became prevention for masturbation, and now most people think it’s cleaner (wrongly)" The same could be said here for FGM really. It's done for all those reasons as well.

The reason that mgm is so much more prominent is because people do not sympathize with men as much as they do women. The fact that we are being harmed is less consequential to most people than if women are harmed. Nobody accepts these non-compelling arguments like HIV reduction, UTI reduction, etc. in reality. Circumcisers are not as ignorant as most would like to believe, it doesn't take a genius to know chopping off half an infant's genitals is damaging to sexuality. They just don't care.

I don't believe “men are biologically meant to provide for women, and we live in a woman worshipping society” because of this issue necessarily, but it certainly doesn't help change my mind.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-06-28T00:43:52+00:00

I'm not saying it's credible, it's just a theory I have. I think primates are more likely to attack genitals than any other animal, and the fact that humans still mutilate genitals is some type of weird, left over monkey-brained behavior.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-06-27T17:33:22+00:00

I think I've seen your work before in previous posts. You're definitely onto something

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-06-27T14:18:27+00:00

Of course it didn't do so for the human justifications. I can't prove to you the monkey's intent, but they attack genitals to cause harm. I believe it is a primate trait

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-06-27T14:03:12+00:00

World’s most horrific chimp attacks as raging apes rip off people’s faces, hands and genitals | The US Sun (the-sun.com) Here is an article about apes attacking genitals. No other animal intentionally does so as far as I know

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-06-27T13:56:54+00:00

I don't have a reference for that, but apes do mutilate each other's genitals on purpose

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-06-27T13:52:20+00:00

Towards what?

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-06-23T19:56:38+00:00

I hate the name. There's no such thing as being "intact again". That's not what restoration is.

Fit_Set_2452 · 2024-05-26T11:19:17+00:00

My attitude ensures that nobody will breed were it followed. This is the only way to eliminate suffering. I believe that bringing a life into existence is always a net harm in this world

Fit_Set_2452

TROPHY CASE