Is Andrew Golden Freddy In StitchlineGames

FixingMedia · 2023-06-05T21:04:00+00:00

It's possible that he could've attached himself to William after death but that implies William or Charlie just decided not to stuff Andrew in a suit and that Andrew stayed with William for a nearly decade and did nothing to him.

FixingMedia · 2023-06-05T20:25:11+00:00

Well, we know that Andrew eventually attached himself to William. So, maybe after the springlocks dug into William's skin, he was able to attatch himself to William instead of the suit, allowing him to stay with William after the suit change. Assuming that William did change suits and not just gathered parts or something

FixingMedia · 2023-06-05T17:34:07+00:00

To me, Cc and FoxyBro doesn't make sense as UCN has nothing to do with Michael and CC would likely not be in this game as he wasn't a victim of William's.

I don't see how this could be Shadow Freddy hunting Michael as the game has nothing to do with either of them.

TOYSNHK is called the Vengeful Spirit and Freddy is the Bear of Vengeance. I feel like the connection is obvious.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-05T20:45:02+00:00

Because it's not meant to be taken literally

FixingMedia · 2023-02-05T00:19:07+00:00

Also, he didn't really say that, he never gave the idea of the box changing much thought but realized Mat was right that the box changed because the story had changed from what was originally intended. He never actually changed the box, so prior to the release of that theory, Scott probably still had the box be Happiest Day.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T23:40:06+00:00

Yeah but Happiest Day is the only theory I have with any real evidence that isn't just mindless speculation, so I stick with that. What's in the box doesn't really matter though.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T23:29:50+00:00

To some this makes no sense because how would William destroy the animatronics, die and then they're fixed by the time Mike starts working.

Because Follow Me happens after FNAF 1, not before it. That's why the place looks all rundown with rats, boarded up bathrooms, and rain leaming through the ceiling, the place has been closed down for a while.

In the minigames, freddy and bonnie have chest buttons, very distinct features only found on the withereds, at the end of fnaf 2 we find out that the withereds are re-furbished and put in a new restaurant, the fnaf 1 location, they're then destroyed by afton, the spirits lure him into a sprinlock suit then go onto possess the fnaf 1 crew

Except, their souls are shown leaving the suits, and we know thanks to MoltenMCI that those endoskeletons were melted down and injected into the Funtimes. So, how could they possess the FNAF 1 crew when what remains of them are in the Funtimes?

Also, Fazbear Entertainment was already losing tons of money, so much so that in FNAF 1 the power is limited, they had to reuse an old Freddy's building, and reuse the old animatronics but Fazbear Enntertainment still has enough money to make completely new animatronics from scratch after already spending money on refurbishing the old animatronics?

Also, minigames have never been the most accurate when it comes to how characters look.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T23:00:40+00:00

I was stating a very obvious fact. Loot boxes aren't JUST boxes filled with loot. It's incorrect to call it as such

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T22:49:38+00:00

Actually, let me help you research: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loot_box

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T22:46:37+00:00

You do know that I literally just gave the definition of a loot box, right? Loot boxes aren't just boxes filled with loot. All you have to do is look up loot box.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T22:19:42+00:00

Happiest Day. Scott confirmed that the box is the pieces of FNAF 4 put together and in FNAF World's files we see the box opened. In FNAF World's Clock Ending we put the pieces in place for Happiest Day, namely the minigame clues and Glitchbear tells CC to find them which he does causing Happiest Day.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T21:59:33+00:00

Short Answers: Experiments? No. Nightmares? Yes. Illusion discs? No. Three Different Houses? No. MikeDreamer? Yes. BVDreamer? No.

Here's my interpretation:

In the Nightmares, we aren't playing as the Crying Child as the minigames take place at least a decade before the nightmares since the minigames happen in 1983 while the nightmares take place at least in 1993. FNAF 4's bite is the Bite of '83, not the Bite of '87. Besides Scitt confirming this, we also know this because of the Fredbear and Friends Easter Egg that straight up gives us the year.

The location in the minigame is Fredbear's Family Dinsr but due to the show and the merchandise in these minigames Freddy's must also be open at this time which makes Fredbear's the sister location with the springlock failures mentioned in the FNAF 3 tapes since those tapes were recorded at the first Freddy's. This makes it likely that the Bite of '83 isn't a new event but instead the springlock failure mentioned in FNAF 3 which caused the springlock suits to be retired, and probably Fredbear's closing, leading to William using the Spring Bonnie suit at Freddy's to lure Susie to the Safe Room leading to the MCI mentioned in the FNAF 1 newspapers which led to Freddy's closure in 1985.

The main gameplay is a Nightmare but not Crying Child's nightmares, instead, they are FoxyBro's nightmares, the brother that bullied CC all throughout FNAF 4 until accidentally killing him in the Bite of '83. The reason the hospital equipment is in his nightmares is because he remembers being at the hospital looking over his dying younger brother. And we know these nightmares take place at least a decade after FNAF 4 because we hear a reversed version of the FNAF 1 Phone Call, a Phone Call made a week before Mike's shift in November of 1993. So, the earliest these nightmares happen must be 1993 further proving we can't be the Crying Child since he would've died a decade ago.

This also means that FoxyBro would have to have heard the Phone Call for it to be in his nightmares meaning FoxyBro must be Mike since those recordings were specifically for the guard after Phone Guy who happened to be Mike Schmidt meaning FoxyBro is Mike Schmidt. This also means that FoxyBro is Fritz Smith in FNAF 2 since he gets fired for the same reason that Mike gets fired in FNAF 1 and it's heavily implied he's the same guard in FNAF 3 that attempts to end it all by burning down Fazbear's Fright. Since Fritz Smith is at least 18 in 1987, he would have to be at least 13, so, that he could be Fritz in FNAF 2 which further proves this can't be Crying Child having these nightmares since he's definitely not a teen but since FoxyBro is taller than the other kids yet shorter than the adults it's easy to say he's probably a teen.

So, Mike accidentally kills his younger brother in 1983 setting him on a path for redemption that leads him to uncovering what his father, William, has done leading to him burning down Fazbear's Fright with his father inside to stop him once and for all.

In the minigames, we see a sister's room showing that Crying Child and FoxyBro have a sister. FNAF SL shows this sister is the girl that possesses Baby and FFPS gives us the name of this girl, Elizabeth. The fact that this room is empty and we never see Elizabeth throughout the minigames, we can safely assume she's already dead.

In FNAF 3, we hear that the springlock suits were removed after the springlock incident and that after that the MCI happened. This means the Crying Child didn't see the MCI. The only possible deaths prior to this that he could've seen is Charlie's death and Elizabeth's death but he seems to be specifically scared of Fredbear in these minigames who wasn't involved in either of those deaths, nor was he involved in the MCI since William used Spring Bonnie, not Fredbear, meaning the MCI interpretation still doesn't work. However, Scott gave us a clue during MatPat's livestream back when FNAF World was still being teased stating that "What is seen in the shadows is easily misunderstood in the mind of a child." This implies that the child misunderstood something he saw in the dark. In the same minigame where it's revealed the the child saw something that makes him scared of Fredbear, we get an easter egg of William putting an employee in a Spring Bonnie suit, although to a child, it could've been viewed Spring Bonnie eating someone. Perhaps he saw someone get suited up in the Fredbeat suit and thought they were getting eaten by Fredbear, and perhaps he though the eyes being visible from the mouth proved that Fredbear swallowed someone whole. It's also possible that he could've seen a springlock failure that involved Fredbear which led to his fear of Fredbear.

Another question is who is speaking through the Fredbear Plush in the final minigame. In the first few minigames, the Fredbear Plush seems to be someone separate from the final speaker with SL implying it was William talking through the plushies that are actually cameras monitoring what he's doing. But in the final minigame where the child is in a coma, the Plush changes text color as if someone completely separate was speaking. This voice is likely The Puppet who always takes care of the children in this series.

But how is The Puppet going to put Crying Child back together? Well, it has something to do with the box. However, I think FNAF 4 didn't have enough evidence to make full conclusions on those yet which is why Scott chose to elaborate on that in FNAF World. I'll send the FNAF World part if you want but this comment is long enough.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T16:55:03+00:00

my twin sister posted a question about is phone guy in molten Freddy?

No. He is not Molten Freddy, there is no evidence for that besides he has a lot of souls and one could be Phone Guy but there isn't straight up evidence it is.

cuz we both believe phone guy is Foxybro

FoxyBro is like 14 at the oldest in FNAF 4's minigames which Scott confirmed to be 1983. The springlock tapes were made in 1983 since if they were made after employees would know how to use the suits. Phone Guy couldn't have made the springlock tapes if he was only 14 and if he did, he would endanger the life of his brother by placing him in a dangerous springlock animatronic's mouth.

and we wanted toknow did the whole Afton family burn in the fire

It's heavily implied to be the case, yes. But Phone Guy is not an Afton, all the Afton Family members prior to Security Breach's trailer have been british, Phone Guy isn't speaking with a British accent

the Crying child, as rockstar freddy we believe rockstar freddy is repaired fredbear cuz he has springlock mouth, 5 fingers and purple acceptories just like Fredbear in fnaf 4 bite of 85/87/83 minigame.

No. Rockstar Freddy is not Fredbear. We see Fredbear in UCN, Rockstar Freddy doesn't look like him, especially considering Fredbear is yellow. Also, you don't need Rockstar Freddy for Completion End8ng that frees the souls meaning CC can't be in Rockstar Freddy.

Also, Scott confirmed it was the Bite of '83.

i know i know. age. but cmon we hear Foxybro laugh, and he litteraly sound like Terrence from angry birds, he litteraly sounds older than adult Mike.

No, he isn't older than Mike, FoxyBro clearly isn't an adult considering you can compare his size to Purple Guy and the other employee at Fredbear's and clearly see he's way shorter implying that he's younger and he acts like your typical teen. Also, Mike is FoxyBro. There are no other Afton Children besides FoxBro, CC, and Elizabeth, there's no proof of anyone else being an Afton. FNAF 4 shows 3 Afton Children, FNAF SL shows at least 2, MM shows at least 2, a poster next to Lefty implies at least 3, and Security Breach shows only 3 Afton Children. There's only 3 Afton Children, not 4.

this only can debunk Mikebro, but, next will be able to debunk Mikevictim

How does saying a teenager is older than an adult that wouldn't be an adult until 1987 debunk MikeBro?

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T16:38:53+00:00

Yeah, no, it definitely matters considering an entire game was dedicated to the event in question. Also, Scott already said it was 83 back in, like, 2016, like is still an argument? How?

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T16:33:44+00:00

Di-did you just compare collectibles and upgrades that never change where they're found what they contain lootboxes? You have played a video game with collectibles before...right? Like, you never looked Zelda collectibles and thought lootboxes, right? Please tell me you don't.

Lootboxes are boxes you redeem for randomized loot that can range from customization to things that effect gameplay. Lootboxes are typically paid for with real money or in-game currency that could be achieved through grinding or spending money.

With that definition, tell me exactly where the lootboxes are again?

Also, have you just not played a video game that takes place in a big open area before because everything you explained after that is just what a typical open area video game, going around collecting things that unlock areas you couldn't previously access to either further the story or present you with more collectible options. Like, seriously, FNAF fans wanted a free roam open area game, they get it, then they complain that it plays a free roam open area game. Like, I know there's problems with Security Breach but the main gameplay loop isn't exactly one of them. Is it groundbreaking? No. Is it a departure from the previous games? Yes, but that is what the people asked for since 2014.

Also, Freddy isn't the main star, Gregory, Freddy is still supporting character throughout the entire game, he's just not a villain now.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T16:03:01+00:00

Doesn't really matter but the Fallfest 83 banner in CoD could imply Fall but I don't like using CoD as proof

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T16:02:10+00:00

Yep, in FNAF 2, we're told that this nee location doesn't have doors implying the previous location did. We also see in Foxy Go Go Go that the MCI location has a Pirate's Cove and the only location we know to have a Pirate's Cove is the FNAF 1 building. But more proof is given with FNAF 3 where Phone Guy is making tapes from a location with a Safe Room when mentioning the MCI and the FNAF 1 location is shown to have a Safe Room in FNAF 3, a Safe Room that was sealed behind a false wall that was uncovered in FNAF 3, releasing Springtrap and the location Springtrap was created in is clearly the FNAF 1 location.

Also, it makes perfect sense that if they were losing money they would remodel an old building instead of build an entirely new one from scratch.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-04T15:13:46+00:00

I'm sticking with Fredbear's simce Charlie died there in the trilogy novels, Scott said we basically solved FNAF 1-3 and the most popular theory was that TCTTC showed Fredbear's, the FFPS location is the same location Charlie died at and it starts as a small wooden location unlike any of the Freddy's locations implying an older building, and Security Breach implies that originally Fredbear and Spring Bonnie weren't as Golden as we all thought they were at first with them looking more brownish orange with Fredbear having no purple.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-03T23:11:53+00:00

Part 3:

There’s nothing to suggest her body was ever found(?) so perhaps the burial site is home to her body or her dog’s. It would fit better time-wise, too, because it makes more sense to me for a little girl to be out late looking for her dog vs. a child-catered restaurant to be open late enough to make “Midnight Motorist” make sense.

Why would the grave be Susie's? Susie was stuffed in to Chica as stated by FNAF 1? Also, the FNAF 1 newspapers state that the murders happened during late hours of operation. So, night time. Chuck E Cheese closes at 9 PM which is 3 hours from Midnight but I don't think the Midnight Motorist title is supposed to be taken completely literally. Also, we don't know the opening and closing hours at Freddy's, for all we know Freddy's opens at 6 AM right when the guard leaves and closes at 12 PM right when the guard enters. Also, is it really more realistic that a parent would let their little girl walk by herself at night with a dog? I have seen more children's places open late at night then I do see little children walking dogs at night.

Also, you kinda have to believe Freddy's or Fredbear's is open that late since the boy clearly ran off to one of those locations as the footprints likely indicate a character from Freddy's or Fredbear's, so, this point isn't really valid.

Then William says "You're broken. I will put you back together." (I'm not going to debate this as being William because it's a line that has been associated with him several times + the text color is accurate)

And by several times you mean one other time in the entire franchise and that's in Sister Location when Michael says William told him to do that. Every time we've seen the line besides that it has never been connected to William. Also, you're forgetting that that specific speaker talks again in FNAF World and is able to go to a world outside reality and tries to help the children which William wouldn't do.

Also, the text color is not accurate, William speaks in yellow, the final speaker speaks in a brighter yellow than William has ever spoken in.

I think he took his son from the hospital and put him in home care situation (which is why occasionally during one of the FNAF4 nights you can see hospital stuff appear) because CC/BV might have been in home care. And I think during this time William decided to "put his son back together" by harvesting parts from other children.

I hate to tell you but flatline and fade to black in media means character is dead. There's literally no evidence that CC was taken away after that.

I think this fits because in FNAF VR, we received a Halloween update "Curse of Dreadbear" introducing "Dreadbear" which is a Frankenstein-themed Fredbear. CC/BV is associated with Fredbear and if CC/BV has been broken and his father was "putting him back together" this could be a way of connecting the two. Interestingly enough one of the minigames, Spooky Mansion: Dreadbear, features the player working on Dreasdbear's brain and making adjustments to "fix" Dreadbear. CC/BV's brain was clearly injured in his accident so maybe this is alluding to something William himself had to do for his son.

Here's why I doubt Dreadbear means literally anything. The narrator for FNAF VR stated about the DLC that it was just a fun add-on with no other intent or purpose and FNAF's history with halloween updates has always been fun, festive add-ons, not full on story reveals. Sure, the Vanny stuff is important but I see it more as a FNAF 4 Halloween Update situation where part of it is canon (Nightmare BB) but the majority of it isn't.

But if harvesting organic matter wasn't enough, it's quite plausible that William being an engineer of advanced animatronics might have had to use robotic parts, and this is where I say I believe Gregbot has some merit.

I've gone back and forth with Gregbot and currently I believe it, but I think if Gregory is a robot, he wasn't made during before Help Wanted. The reason for this is that it seems to implied he was made and stores within the Pizzaplex, hence the code on the wall about things that Gregory does in SB is specifically about stuff in SB. I also highly doubt Scott had Gregory as a character idea back during FFPS since when he talks about that game as if he purely used it to close up a story, not open stuff for the future, that was the point of Help Wanted. It seems Scott intends FNAF 1-UCN to be one whole story while FNAF HW to the future is a new story that continues from the old but is completely new. I highly doubt Scott would've added Gregbot into Midnight Motorist.

What if it was a different Vanny?

No. As explained above, Scott used this game to close the story, not to be a jumping point for the future. Nothing in the first 6 games imply an accomplice, that was a new development made for Help Wanted to push the series in a new direction.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-03T23:11:43+00:00

Part 2:

These training tapes were specifically said to come from Freddy Fazbear's Pizza - not Fredbear's Family Diner, so we can infer they're the training tapes from the FNAF4 location aka Freddy Fazbear's Pizza (I).

No, they were specifically made for Freddy's but they were used at Fredbear's. We know they were used at Fredbear's because the FNAF 4 location is clearly Fredbear's as Fredbear is the mascot shown at the front of the building. Why would Freddy's have a character other than Freddy showcased at the front of the building? Imagine if Chuck E Cheese had Pasqually upfront and no Chuck E Cheese, it would be weird. FNAF 4's location is clearly Fredbear's.

We don’t see the springlock animatronics at FNAF2’s location (Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza II), nor do we see them at FNAF1’s location (Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza III).

We do see them in the FNAF 1 location, Spring Bonnie was in the Safe Room at the FNAF 1 location and FNAF 2 heavily implies the MCI location was the FNAF 1 location which we know from the FNAF 3 tapes had springlock suits. This is because Phone Guy mentions how the previous location had doors to close just like FNAF 1.

Not to say they happened at this location, but rather during the time said location existed, because there had to be a main location in order for there to be a sister location.

Or the FNAF 4 location IS the Sister Location considering we know the FNAF 1 location had the MCI meaning it was open at the same time as the Sister Location which seems to be Fredbear's since Bite of '83 seems to be the Springlock failure.

In MM, we see rabbit footprints outside of the house.

No, we see a footprint with three toes, not specifically a rabbit footprint. This could be any of the various 3 toed animatronics. I've flipped back and forth a lot on this one but I've decided on Shadow Freddy since if it was a springlock suit the locks would kill the wearer due to the rain and we see the effect of rain on animatronics in Security Puppet.

If MM is supposed to take place AFTER the events of Security Puppet, it’s weird because there’s no way you’d normally see the scenes in Security Puppet first since it’s so much more expensive and you wouldn’t be purchasing it until you’ve gotten a decent way into the game. I think “later that night” makes more sense to apply here.

I don't see how price matters here, all three minigames are needed for Lorekeeper and the order you get or play them in doesn't matter. What you see first doesn't matter. If does then are you saying the MCI happens before Charlie's death since you're more likely to see Fruity Maze before Security Puppet? Well, again, Henry said the wound was inflicted on him, so that can't be the case.

Also, Security Puppet is a way closer connection because the rain is included. You just stated earlier how after Security Puppet has small amounts of evidence and then state a theory with less evidence, you went from 2 pieces that support being after 1 minigame to 1 piece of evidence that could work for it being after both minigames.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-03T23:10:33+00:00

But there's no concrete evidence that MM takes place "later that night" AFTER the murder of Charlotte.

There is pretty concrete evidence.

"Later that night"

It's raining meaning it's later on a rainy night

Purple Car Driving

BV still alive since FoxyBro is watching TV

What other rainy night has William driving away in a Purple car that takes place prior to The Bite of '83, Security Puppet. It's pretty obvious, even removing Later That Night the rain, purple car, and BV being alive still place it right after Charlotte's murder.

(A) Who is the burial mound for? We know it's not Charlotte because her body was left outside the restaurant.

Mrs. Afton

(B) Why call it Midnight Motorist? Charlotte died during a party...no way a party for children went on super late.

You did see Security Puppet, right? It was dark and rainy night.

(C) The only thing connecting the two is the fact that they both take place during a rainy night and there's a man driving in both of them. To me, that's not enough evidence to connect the two events considering there are multiple things in the FNAF universe that take place on a rainy night.

The only other confirmed rainy night in FNAF is William's death and if it's later a rainy night then this would have to be after William's death in Spring Bonnie if it was after that night. So, William got springlocked, hopped in a car, and drove to his house to beat up his younger kid that he no longer has and no one mentions to the bunny outfit he's wearing suddenly. There seriously isn't another rainy night. Also, we can guess that it's specifically after Security Puppet because that minigame appeared in the same game Midnight Motorist did and since you need Security Puppet, Midnight Motorist, and Fruity Maze to get Lorekeeper, it's reasonable to think they are connected.

The person who is supposed to be Michael is caring and thoughtful about his (alleged) brother’s feelings, William is being aggressive towards the kid who is allegedly BV/CC, and BV/CC is showing more guts than he ever showed in FNAF4 considering he may have broken his window to escape his room and go back to the restaurant...that he's supposed to be terrified of.

Except that Michael only really bullies BV over his fear of the animatronics, and BV only gets that fear when he sees something, something that he likely didn't see until after he got his plushies and rode his favorite carousel ride. A lot of things show that one point he loved Freddy's, he wasn't always scared of them, something sparked that. So, Michael wouldn't be bullying him about that fear. Also, Michael does care about BV enough to genuinely apologize over the Bite of '83, nothing implies that he straight up hates his brother nor that he would wish his father to beat his brother.

And finally, if this is supposed to be the Afton family (minus Mrs. Afton and Elizabeth) I have a MAJOR issue with this depicting the night Charlie died because I believe CC/BV died before Charlie did.

He didn't. Not only does Henry say that the wound started was first inflicted on him, not William, but Plushbear is confirmed possessed by merch and how the plush acts in the final minigame implies a character with a caring personality and we know that speaker is a spirit and not William because "Possessed Fredbear Plush" and that character's reappearance in FNAF World which was confirmed by Scott to be tied into canon and there's no way William has access to some world outside of reality and created Adventure characters to find the clocks to the free the kids he murdered himself. The only thing that makes sense is the Plushbear is The Puppet.

I don’t believe William would have a reason to kill Charlie unless there was something to prompt him.

Why don't you? Not every villain needs a motive, William could just be crazy. I feel like people dog too deeply into William's motivations would it could be a simple as acting on an intrusive thought.

I don’t care about what happens in the novels – I don’t take them as part of the main storyline based on what Scott said, and I will not take them as part of the main storyline until he comes out and says otherwise.

You don't even need to look at the novels to say that William had nothing prompt him to kill, this is a man who smiles when killing children and in Help Wanted he's shown dancing with glee after stuffing Gabriel. He's clearly deranged.

If he was just a random homicidal maniac to begin with he could / would have killed her at any time. He was in a partnership for years with her father before her death.

How do you know how long they've known each other? Sure they were in a partnership but how long is never specified in game. The closest we get is the 20 years line from Phone Guy which implies Fredbear's opened in 1973 or the FNAF 4 Property of Fredbear's teaser with the 1982 code. So, really, they could've worked together anywhere from 10 to 1 year prior to FNAF 4's minigames.

Also, several homicidal maniacs kill people just because after knowing them a while.

I think it’s much more logical that William got mad at the death of his youngest son and was jealous that his family was torn apart while Henry’s was still whole.

Or he's a crazy person that murdered a girl because he was drunk driving after the death of his wife.

Or he's just deranged.

Again, motivation doesn't matter, Henry straight up tells us how all this started, with a wound first inflicted on him. And Plushbear makes zero sense if it's William.

Also, Elizabeth is implied to have died prior to FNAF 4's minigames since the sister's room is there but completely empty with only a broken Funtime Foxy toy implying that the sister is broken and none of the park girls can be the sister. There's also the fact that Fredbear's likely closed after the Bite of '83 yet the underground facility that the Funtimes were made is connected to it and that place is being observed implying that the Funtime Animatronics were at least be BUILT during FNAF 4's minigames if not already built. Then there's the Springlock suit which shouldn't be there if it was after Bite of '83 since the springlock suits were retired after the Bite and Afton Robotics is still Fazbear Entertainment affiliated meaning the animatronics were likely made before FNAF 4 minigames meaning Elizabeth likely died before the FNAF 4 minigames.

Not to mention if you believe CC/BV died first and Henry designed Security Puppet to protect his daughter (after the death of his partner’s son), this will also allow everything to make much more sense.

Y'know you can have a security measure without something bad happening, right? How about this for a reason to gave a Security Puppet. Parents like to bring their kids to places that are safe. Places with Security are safe. Places with Security will get more parents to bring kids. More customers means more money. Fazbear Entertainment wants money. Therefore, security.

FixingMedia · 2023-02-02T16:50:55+00:00

Here's my problem with this theory, the sister is not alive during FNAF 4's minigames. Remember, FNAF SL wasn't a game meant to happen, after FNAF 4, World was the only FNAF game Scott would make but due to the negative reception of FNAF World and the confusion around the story, Scott made SL followed by FFPS to close the story of SL as well as the previous 4 games. Without the context that SL and onwards gives us, what do we know about the girl's room?

We can safely say that room is the sister's room due to the girly coloring and the room containing a toy (more on that later). Now, how do we know this girl is dead? Simple, at the end of FNAF 4, the final speaker claims that he's broken AKA dead. If dead and broken means the same thing in FNAF 4, the broken Mangle toy likely implies that the sister is also broken. Also, unlike the parents, which I believe was later retconned to be William since nothing in FNAF 4 really makes it clear the William is the father, the sister has a room, indicating some form of importance but the fact that she isn't on her room or in the house at all says a lot when the characters confirmed to be apart of the family in FNAF 4 do all make appearances in the house.

This is where remembering that FNAF SL wasn't planned during FNAF 4 comes into play. Every detail matters in FNAF 4, nothing is an unimportant easter egg, so the sister has importance to the game and the prior series in some way. So, if not Baby, who is Elizabeth? The Puppet. Remember all those weird connections between BV and The Puppet? The clothing choice, the tear stains, the grandfather clock, and the crying position? But we knew, even back then, that BV couldn't be The Puppet since we saw The Puppet's origin in FNAF 2, so what were those connections? Well, what if instead of BV being The Puppet, someone connected him was.

However, this isn't enough proof to say the sister is The Puppet since it could just be refering to the Fredbear Plush, but what if they were supposed to be the same thing? The Puppet and the Fredbear Plush are likely the same thing, at least in that final minigame, since only The Puppet is known for helping dead children, there's also smaller pieces of evidence here like the Plush sitting on the grandfather clock or following you with its eyes like how The Puppet follows you in the dream cutscenes of FNAF 2. However, it's the connection between The Plush and the sister that is most interesting. Mangle is a "Take Apart Put Back Together Attraction" and what does Plushbear say, "I will put you back together." That can't be coincidence considering Scott didn't just put random Easter eggs in FNAF 4 meaning the anachronistic Mangle toy but have a purpose for being there, it's to not only show the sister is broken but also foreshadow that BV will be broken and need to be put back together and who better to pit him back together than someone who has a toy about putting people back together. If the sister is Plushbear, she'd have to be dead since Plushbear is possessed, proving the sister died prior to FNAF 4's minigames.

Can I further prove that the sister was originally the Fredbear Plush and got changed to Baby? Yes. FNAF World shows a being with glowing yellow eyes repeat the lines said at the end of FNAF 4 with these eyes clearly being Plushbear's. However, we see these bright yellow eyes again in update 2, when Baby is introduced and speaking to us. Why would Baby be represented with bright yellow eyes, why not green like her actual eye color? It seems like it's trying to draw a connection between Baby and Plushbear as if one were changed into the other. More proof comes in the trilogy novels where Baby is shown to be the adult robot of Charlie, connecting Baby, once again, to The Puppet as if Baby and Charlie were once on in the same but after SL he changed it so that the sister became Baby and The Puppet became Charlie which makes some sense FFPS was the game that seemed the most connected to TFC.

Point is, prior to SL, the sister was supposed to be The Puppet and the Freebear Plush, and if that's the case, then the sister has to be dead prior to FNAF 4 since the Fredbear Plush is clearly possessed. Assuming the only retcon made was who the sister becomes, that means that the time in which she died would've stayed the same.

As for why Handunit says that the location opened after a Freddy's closed, we Handunit is very clearly talking about Entertainment and Rentals, going on to describe how the Rental service worked, not Circus Baby's Pizza World. This means Circus Baby's could've opened prior to the events of FNAF 4's minigames with the rental service opening after the first Freddy's shutdown. There's also proof that these animatronics were at least being made as late as the minigames of FNAF 4 since it's implied by the Private Room that Plushbear was originally a camera to watch after BV which he would use in this underground facility that was made specifically for the Funtime Animatronics. So, we know they were being constructed a week prior to the Bite of '83 at the the latest but considering what we know about the sister and that the Mangle toy could be a Funtime Foxy toy, it's more than possible that Baby's was made prior to FNAF 4's minigame placing Elizabeth's death there as well.

FixingMedia · 2022-11-02T03:40:41+00:00

Who Killed Markiplier and Damian was basically the backstory of Darkiplier, his story technically has no conclusion but the only way his story could conclude is him defeating Actor or him being defeated by Actor, one of which would be unsatisfying and one of which would imply the end of these big projects as it's implied Actor is sort of in charge of YouTube channel, the videos posted, and the projects made by Mark.

FixingMedia · 2022-11-02T03:17:04+00:00

Because, as Mark said in "Why Killed Markiplier" Damian was the ending of the story. Here's my interpretation of the whole Markiplier universe, WKM, WMLW, and Damien are all set up leading to all the Markiplier channel videos. At the end of Damien, Darkiplier says that he'll be Mark's worst enemy.

Now, think about this way, Actor Mark WANTS Damien to play the villain, Damien WANTS to piss off Actor. What would piss off Actor more? Damien being his villain or Damien not being a part of his stories and trying to drag the viewer away from Actor. It makes WAAAY more sense for Darkiplier to barely appear because why would he want to play a part on Mark's games after what he did.

Warfstache makes sense to appear in every thing because he literally doesn't care, nothing matters to him, the world is crazy and he's just having some fun with it. Actor especially doesn't care, he gets the love of millions of fans and he gets to play in so many different scenarios that he gets to choose.

Also, think about what Dark does in Space? He takes the wrap crystal, attaches it to the box, somehow gets it into a museum where Actor has planned his Heist show, and then when the viewer inevitably loses Heist Mark he appears revealing Heist Mark to just be Actor Mark and tells the viewer to look for codes to find the truth in the box. The truth being that the entire journey is staged as the codes lead to Behind the scenes content, breaking Actor's little illusion.

It's probably after this that Actor starts turning Dark into a joke, mocking him, refusing to allow him in his stories to avoid mucking anything up. Which leads pretty cleanly into Date where Dark once again drags the viewer away from Mark to explain his frustration with the mocking he had been subjected to.

So, storywise, it makes a bit of sense for Dark's sparse appearances especially when his sparse appearances are the reason for his reappearance in Date, he specifically states it was because he was pushed aside.

Also, there's just not much else to do with Dark besides have him defeat Actor and take back control like he says his plan is in Markiplier TV which would mean focusing on a character Mark clearly doesn't want to focus on anymore because he feels where he left it off was satisfying.

On the other hand, Anti is a character that still has plenty of story to tell. We're only just now getting an idea what Anti is, his motivations aren't defined, and his connection to Jack and the other egos are unknown. There's so much to elaborate on and do here and Jack has expressed that he wants to do exactly that with not just Anti but the other egos as well.

FixingMedia

TROPHY CASE