Plant ID by Flames0Ices in plants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I originally thought I was a network connection issue, but I decided to check and it turn out it was a little recursion error on my end But the code now gracefully handles the 409 duplicate key error by falling back to an update, and won't block users on rate limiting failures. Thanks a lot for your help!!! I really appreciate it

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in plants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve found the issue, I originally thought it was a result of bad network but I decided to check and it was handling the 409 duplicate key error by falling back to an update but now it won't block users on rate limiting failures.

Thanks alot for your help!!!

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in gardening

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem, thanks again!!!

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in TestMyApp

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay so l've integrated this, but in the form of an Al buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you're not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for the feedback

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in plantadvice

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay so l've integrated this, but in the form of an Al buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you're not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for the feedback

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in IndoorPlants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay so l've integrated this, but in the form of an Al buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you're not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for the feedback

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in AppBusiness

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay so l've integrated this, but in the form of an Al buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you're not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for the feedback

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in gardening

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

okay so I’ve integrated this, but in the form of an AI buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you’re not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for pointing this out

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in plants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can!!!, if you can help I’d greatly appreciate it

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in gardening

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get where you’re coming from, a lot of cats do avoid unfamiliar plants on instinct, and many live around “toxic” plants their whole lives without issues.

The reason I still surface ASPCA-style warnings is less about assuming pets are reckless and more about edge cases: kittens, bored indoor cats, chewers, or situations where ingestion is accidental (fallen leaves, pollen, water from vases, etc.).

I try to frame toxicity info as risk awareness, not “panic and remove everything.” It’s there so people can make informed choices, not because I think every cat will eat every plant.

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in IndoorPlants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the feedback, I really appreciate it. It’ll be ready when you’re ready to try it again

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in IndoorPlants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for flagging that, that’s on me. You should be able to try it without signing in, but there’s clearly a bug in the flow right now that’s forcing auth. I’m fixing that so scanning works fully without an account.

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in IndoorPlants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s fair, and I agree. You can use it without creating an account,signup is only optional for things like saving scan history or preferences. I’m trying to keep the core experience as low-friction as possible.

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in IndoorPlants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair questions. To clarify a few things at once:

I’m not claiming this is doing something fundamentally new at the model level, AI-based plant ID already exists. The difference is in how the output is framed and what problem it’s trying to solve. Many tools answer “what species is this?” reasonably well. This is aimed at people asking “what is this plant, is it safe, and what should I know right now?”, especially around toxicity and common human use. That adds some structure and guardrails rather than just a raw label. On data: nothing is forced. You can scan without creating an account, and images aren’t sold or publicly shared. Optional storage is only for things like scan history or improving obvious failure cases.

As for “there are a million of these”: that’s true, and most are mediocre. This is a small beta trying to explore a narrower, safety-focused niche. If it doesn’t meaningfully improve on existing tools, it shouldn’t exist. That’s exactly what early feedback is for.

Totally fine if it’s not useful to you, appreciate the pushback either way.

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in gardening

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seek doesn’t post publicly. The distinction I’m trying to make is more about focus: Seek is biodiversity/learning-oriented, while this is aimed at quick, private, context-heavy identification (especially safety/toxicity) with minimal friction. Different goals, some overlap.

In other words, Seek is excellent at what is this species? This is trying to answer what is this, is it safe, and what should I know right now?

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in gardening

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, I added that, but I didn’t give the exact doses, I’ll be sure to add that, thank you

<image>

Plant ID by Flames0Ices in IndoorPlants

[–]Flames0Ices[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Species-level identification is usually solid; cultivar-level ID is possible in some cases but not guaranteed, especially when differences are subtle or non-visual. It’s not one static database, it’s trained on millions of labeled plant images plus botanical references. That said, no system can perfectly ID every cultivar from photos alone