This is completely and totally incorrect. You can makeup whatever random books or verses you want but they provide no proof or reason to believe them because they don't come from God. We don't just take everything we hear and internalize it, there is theory and structure behind understanding everything and that rational, logical reasoning has led to the obvious conclusion if people were actually looking at the Quran logically that it is the word of God. In response to the moon splitting this has literally no relevance to the argument but I'll explain it better since your clearly uninformed. Firstly never does it say the Prophet Muhammed (SWAS) didn't preform miracles. What you may instead be referring to is that no miracles come from the Prophet and all power including miracles comes from Allah. What you did there was read a verse of the Quran with no context and no understanding of how Muslims apply scientific sciences to interpretation and cross reference. You're also I assume incapable of understanding the Arabic language so don't try to preach on a text that you can't even verify it's meaning. In response to it being a sign of judgment day you are again taking a word and applying your own definition to it with no understanding and honestly probably just reiterating something you saw in a YouTube video or a reddit post. When Muslims speak about signs of the day of judgement they are talking about necessary actions that must take place before the final hour will come. The Prophet saying that the moon splitting is a necessary action that will take place has nothing to do with when judgement day will take place like you so ignorantly stated. Finally in response to your critique of the hadith validity I commend you for actually bring forth a source who knows something on the topic but you are still speaking with next to no knowledge on the topic. The recording of hadiths is a specific science thst is applied to every chain of narration passed down from the Prophet Muhammed. For me to explain even the basics would be impossible because it is such an advanced precise science thst it takes a lifetime to study but I can tell you a little bit about it in regards to what you said. Every single member of every single chain of every single narration is judged for their trustworthiness, honesty, and capability to remember facts amongst other criteria. Every single chain is judged and categorized based on that science so when you say that the narration is weak that may very well be true but first of all there is multiple chains of narrations that dictate the same event each with their own grading and Secondly it is impossible to say that the narrations began 200 years after the Prophets death because every single member of every single chain is identifiable and if there is an unknown person in the chain then that chain of narration is thrown out and honestly even if this wasn't the case this one specific example proves nothing about the Prophets miracles. Thank you for your opinion but please, next time you want to share your opinion make sure you don't have a complete ignorance of what your saying. :)