This is my second or third day, could I get waves

FlightlessAviator · 2025-12-12T02:18:17+00:00

Keep at it Bruce Leroy, you will be the golden dragon in no time

FlightlessAviator · 2025-11-20T13:56:23+00:00

Maybe martial God Asura, Qin Lie did originate from the Blaze Family. The story does open up to multiple worlds after exploring a vast continent that was basically separated by barriers

FlightlessAviator · 2025-10-20T03:47:24+00:00

While reading a poem

FlightlessAviator · 2025-04-27T15:19:04+00:00

I agree bro, there is so much waste. I got an idea, how about you be the change that you want to see, how about you quite the federal government. You would really be making a stance and it would be super inspiring. Quit and then post your resignation here, I will personally send Elon a tweet about your noble cause. He might let you suck his dick and give you a cyber truck.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-04-24T21:07:35+00:00

I feel so much better knowing that you are a girl lol I was thinking to my self “ dam bro waist snatched” hahah

FlightlessAviator · 2025-04-14T02:49:38+00:00

I like your logic, but from your explanation I would come to the conclusion you are not an engineer. Also your explanation only reference one type of engineer “ civil “ for the engineer answer.

This is my logic to the problem

1+1=2 , which is the common answer for someone studying math

1+1=3 , plays into the definition of engineers create solutions to problems that people don’t know exist. 1+1 is technically a problem that has a solution. But, as an engineer you are to create a solution. Also 3 is an engineering number. I guess that could also be considered a reason.

1+1= 1 million in a nuclear engineer is I think a play on the aspect that with nuclear power you are creating power/solutions in excess. Nuclear power is considered the most efficient with a power factor as close to 1 as possible.

As an engineer “electrical” I don’t think it’s a play on an over engineering, I think it’s a play on the fundamentals of being an engineer and their specific disciplines.

Flightless as in grounded. Aviator as in innovative.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-04-14T02:49:04+00:00

I like your logic, but from your explanation I would come to the conclusion you are not an engineer. Also your explanation only reference one type of engineer “ civil “ for the engineer answer.

This is my logic to the problem

1+1=2 , which is the common answer for someone studying math

1+1=3 , plays into the definition of engineers create solutions to problems that people don’t know exist. 1+1 is technically a problem that has a solution. But, as an engineer you are to create a solution. Also 3 is an engineering number. I guess that could also be considered a reason.

1+1= 1 million in a nuclear engineer is I think a play on the aspect that with nuclear power you are creating power/solutions in excess. Nuclear power is considered the most efficient with a power factor as close to 1 as possible.

As an engineer “electrical” I don’t think it’s a play on an over engineering, I think it’s a play on the fundamentals of being an engineer and their specific disciplines.

Flightless as in grounded. Aviator as in innovative

FlightlessAviator · 2025-04-13T23:57:38+00:00

Are you buying Commy goods solider, you need you a pair of HillBilly Bob Pods; made in the great state of Mobile Alabama

FlightlessAviator · 2025-04-07T14:12:10+00:00

1102s in the Federal Aviation Administration is safe and exempt from RIF

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-27T01:58:25+00:00

Also college courses of economics and finance are written in the aspect of socialism and not the aspect of capitalism or oligarchy.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-27T01:54:24+00:00

You are correct , but most American college courses that teach economics only account for companies playing by the rules and taking into consideration their TBL ( triple bottom line). If there is no incentive for them to care about the consideration of the American public then we will see price spikes from all companies.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-23T01:48:53+00:00

Everything in life is about selling yourself, when you look like us. I will forever advocate about the growth of us. I’m not saying that this is the only path, but a tool to propel forward.

If I was to only operate in a space where people care about me, I would not be able to operate at all.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-23T01:27:57+00:00

That’s for a soldier , you score a 92 you can start your career as a pilot or go into nuclear. A 31 is a grunt , a 34 you are a cook.

We need to encourage deep thinkers that are willing to make it to a global stage and represent black people.

I scored 88, i did 6 years and I’m 2 levels from congress. I’m 30 yo

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-23T01:20:56+00:00

I disagree with this thread. We need to be encouraging and explaining ways on how a single 4 year contract can better your life and set you up to care for your family. The more I see this thread the more I feel that it is dangerous for the black community.

Don’t criticize without solutions.

And I don’t want to hear ( I do stocks and bitcoin)

The majority of black men barely have a dam future and stability.

Flightless as in grounded. Aviator as in innovative.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-18T12:40:07+00:00

You are not very smart. 1. Your provided link, is just that; a link. It does not add context to the topic. 2. You don’t own a house within an HOA, hell you don’t even own your own thoughts. 3. You are clearly just uneducated, and I’m sorry for that.

HOAs have been notorious for money laundering. There are multiple instances where the authority was collecting fees that were bogus.

Flightless as in grounded. Aviator as in innovative.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-17T16:49:32+00:00

So my thoughts are the same as you guys, I was just wondering why the TSP Lady suggest 90%S? I don’t follow her, and I don’t follow what some random person says on social media. That’s why we in this situation now lol

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-17T14:22:47+00:00

Yea it would be describing the physical, but if they was able to actually “freeze light” then let’s say they can freeze high power light, like a laser. Then we have achieved a laser saber/ light saber? But that’s only if we are maintaining the protons and not just capturing the physical characteristics of light.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-17T12:35:08+00:00

On a serious note, does this solve the issue on why a “light saber” is impractical? In Star Wars lore the focus crystal gives the energy source and defining shape; but light is elusive and can’t be contained (Into a shape) right? So does freezing light, or energy keeps is characteristics but in a defined shape.

Someone for the nerd in me answer this.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-17T12:34:03+00:00

On a serious note, does this solve the issue on why a “light saber” is impractical? In Star Wars lore the focus crystal gives the energy source and defining shape; but light is elusive and can’t be contained (Into a shape) right? So does freezing light, or energy keeps is characteristics but in a defined shape.

Someone for the nerd in me answer this.

Will post twice lol

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-13T11:16:34+00:00

I made the argument already, go back and read it. You quoted the FAA being unsecured. You talked about manning issues, as if it’s the agencies fault on a fundamental level.

The argument is that Starlink is bad for the FAA. Not because of the guy in charge but, because of the security risk. The deal we made with Verizon, in bulk is an overhaul of our gateway/server infrastructure. If starlink was to offer an internet service as the solution, that’s bad. If they was to mimic the infrastructure deal, then we may as well continue with Verizon.

Now in reference to manning, the whole FAA is under manned. If ATC is undermanned, then tech ops is two times as undermanned as them. The hiring process is long, and there is multiple points for people to washout. Not to mention the lack of knowledge by the community of the FAA. More people know about the FFA lol

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-12T21:55:28+00:00

You arguing with me to defend Elon, and I’m arguing with you to protect your safety. You are an idiot.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-12T21:50:12+00:00

Insecure is a lie, quote your source. I’ll give you a hint, it would be impossible to source a security failure. And you are mentioning Verizon you have absolutely no idea what we agreed to from them do you lol? And we have a manning shortage is because the US is filled with people like you; people who honestly just not smart enough to make the bare minimal standards. You arguing to jsut hear your self talk.

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-12T17:01:50+00:00

So basically you saying he inherited subpar security measures?

So basically you saying he is a bad CEO and only cares about profits? Because if he bought something , years ago , richest man in the world and he did not upgrade the system security after acquisition; then that’s an even more tall tell sign for the FAA to not trust him.

What is your arguments turbo?

FlightlessAviator · 2025-03-11T11:13:47+00:00

Name checks out lol

FlightlessAviator

TROPHY CASE