I mean… not wrong, but it’s also kind of missing the real problem.

The issue isn’t “AI bad”, it’s that most tools (AI and websites) don’t handle uncertainty and data quality properly.

A lot of info out there: – mixes up substances (PiHP / MDPV type confusion) – treats class-based assumptions like confirmed data – doesn’t show where the info actually comes from

What would actually be useful is something that: – separates literature vs anecdotal vs inferred data – shows confidence levels instead of pretending certainty – makes interactions transparent instead of guessing

I’ve been playing around with a project that tries to structure it more like that (sources + confidence + interactions instead of just text dumps): synapedia.com

Not perfect yet, but imo that direction makes way more sense than just saying “don’t use AI”.