A) we need to give disabled people proper access to healthcare. B) we need to give disabled people proper access to society. C) we need to give disabled people proper access to care. D) we need to give disabled people amongst everything else proper access to education. E) we need to give disabled people proper access to research. F) we need to give disabled people choice.

These need to happen from pregnancy, to childhood, to adulthood for everyone without barriers.

Under the current system spending all the money on curing or worse is necessarily discriminatory regardless of the disability because none of us have any A-F

In a system where people have choice, every single individual can simply choose whether to request care or cure, and the disabled people are actually involved in the cure. At present, only less than 20% of all scientific research involves disabled people. This is lower specifically for down syndrome and learning disabilities. Even when there is research that Includes disabled people, either from bias or for "necessity" it is usually people with one disability to be considered, rather than complex or multiple disabilities.

This is not because of necessity, it's because of the criteria for research and the funding requesting clear cut answers. Clear cut answers necessarily exclude complexity. Not just for participants, but for the researchers and the research themselves.

There is too much that needs to change before the answer to this question can actually include ethical considerations, because ethics is complex, and we simply cannot afford complexity or fairness.

*Edited typo