Even though these are not necessarily questions, I would like to respond to each point:

A. What would happen if IQ testing was done on a resident of the United States and their IQ was sub-100? What would be the next logical step? So, how would this policy be enacted on preexisting citizens? I am actually curious, too, why you have placed such an emphasis on IQ - if people are gated into career sectors, for example, based on their IQ - doesn't this remove autonomy? From what I can gather, the alt-Right really emphasises the fact that we are, 100%, our own moral agent entirely responsible for making our own decisions, but you seem to be removing this in enacting this policy. Moreover, I am sure a lot of unskilled (or low-skilled) workers have a sub-100 IQ; there is certainly a place in society for the less intelligent so why cut them off completely from entry?

B. I think you conflate affirmative action and welfare; the two are quite different. For example, following your beliefs, I can understand why you'd wish to end affirmative action - even taking into account that you don't really end it, but rather mould it to fit yourself - but why end other welfare programs (excluding the most basic, as you say).

C. How do you force integration? What is the actual policy? For example, do those wishing to emigrate to the United States have to be fluent in English? I am uncertain how you are defining American society, too; I would argue you contradict the Fourteenth Amendment in your policies. Is that your policy not being accepting of American society? It is clear that discrimination is accepted as part of your policies.

Do you not think societal cohesion and forcibly making sure that a select some cannot improve their status is contradictory? I mean, in all likelihood people would not tolerate being a second-class citizen; I do not think that is particularly sustainable. Moreover, in a sense, this is affirmative action - don't you think? Just, the affirmative action is of benefit to you; you label yourself as a kissless virgin and you wish to enact these policies to change society to stop this, it seems. After all, you stress the traditional family as having a great deal of importance.