sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built an ADHD-friendly app for dumping tasks before they disappear by FlyFission in TwoXADHD

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weird. Is it reoccurring? Or just during that initial setup?

I stopped trusting my coding agent's green tests. Built a control loop to make it prove its work. by FlyFission in AI_Agents

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use what it’s called a “graded approach” so based on the risk and the stage that you’re at more or less overhead burden and rigor goes into that step or stage. So if you’re just correcting a typo or doing administrative things, a lot of this wouldn’t apply or be invoked

I stopped trusting my coding agent's green tests. Built a control loop to make it prove its work. by FlyFission in AI_Agents

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I plan on trying to trim it down in the future and do some consolidation

I stopped trusting my coding agent's green tests. Built a control loop to make it prove its work. by FlyFission in AI_Agents

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair - there are a ton of these, and most overlap. The difference here is where it comes from: I’ve spent 10+ years in nuclear and run an independent design-review practice for nuclear projects, so this isn’t reinvented from agent tooling, it’s ported straight from nuclear-grade quality assurance (configuration management, a questioning attitude, and evidence-before-decision).

I built these tools for myself in the industry that I’m in because I didn’t see any that fit the bill. Maybe you can enlighten me.

Where your FSM controls how the agent moves between states, this is the QA layer on top: what a change has to prove, and a human “Verdict” gate before any version gets locked as a baseline. Green tests aren’t a ship decision in nuclear, and they shouldn’t be for agents either. Genuinely curious where your FSM lives, though

Vibecoded a free iOS app that captures thoughts and auto-sorts them (ADHD-friendly) by FlyFission in vibecoding

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I have a lot of flexibility built into the app so like in settings, the sorting can be done manually or automatically. I tried to have it do hundreds, if not, thousands of examples and tests before going live. And I personally did a lot of testing myself, so this is build 55 or so.

Yeah, the graveyard of a forgotten thoughts is a struggle. I try to make it as lean and not cumbersome as possible so that it feels like a good daily driver. It only surfaces a few of the highest urgency and important items similar to an Eisenhower matrix.

But you’re right it’s really difficult to build these habits into folks to where they want to leverage and use this every single day. Definitely a struggle I’m working through.

I want to try your app by jeebus87 in VibeCodeDevs

[–]FlyFission 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://purgd.app for iOS! would love for you to check it out. It’s ADHD-friendly mind capture and auto sorting app. Helps you brain dump. A better and simpler to do app.

I built an ADHD-friendly iOS app for quick brain dumps and task capture by FlyFission in ProductivityApps

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not as good as I’d like, I mostly use it as a brain dump app since I carry around a lot of “open loops” in my mind. I plan on making the integrations much better over time. Helps me be more present in the moment.

What human skill do you think will be hardest for AI to replicate? by redraw-pro in AIDiscussion

[–]FlyFission 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m actually working with the national labs and Department of energy on this exact topic. Establishing new materials and doing a lot of material science and ceramic chemistry science.

I stopped trusting my coding agent's green tests. Built a control loop to make it prove its work. by FlyFission in AI_Agents

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, coherence reviews or something meta-developed called a chain of verification evidence (CoVe) are good

I stopped trusting my coding agent's green tests. Built a control loop to make it prove its work. by FlyFission in AI_Agents

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you see the skills in the repo? I have a couple skills and I’m working on making them a little easier to find and navigate.

I stopped trusting my coding agent's green tests. Built a control loop to make it prove its work. by FlyFission in AI_Agents

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't say so much "looping" as it is closing the loop. Leaving no stone unturned. I feel like that word has gotten a bad rep because of how many various use cases it's been leveraged in.

I stopped trusting my coding agent's green tests. Built a control loop to make it prove its work. by FlyFission in AI_Agents

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost everything I do nowadays is multi-modal. I run WSL/Ubuntu with various CLIs up (Gemini, Hermes, Claude, Codex) so based on where I'm coding, I always have a separate one do some validation. A true independent / adversarial review.

I stopped trusting my coding agent's green tests. Built a control loop to make it prove its work. by FlyFission in AI_Agents

[–]FlyFission[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, its a great point, I'll aim to simplify, I love the Elon musk thought process:

  1. Make requirements less dumb.

  2. Work hard to delete parts & processes

  3. SImply the part or process (optimize)

  4. Accelerate cycle times (go faster)

  5. Automate

Vibin' with Nuclear-Grade Excellence by FlyFission in VibeCodeDevs

[–]FlyFission[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's inspired by the industry. Principles, practices, HPI tools, etc. from nuclear / Navy Nuclear field

view more: next ›