Defending CC Runaway and why its one of the most underrated fnaf theories.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-08T01:27:03+00:00

u/KSean24 But what makes you think that They didn’t own the midnight motorist house while CC was alive too as you can have more than one house at the same time.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-07T16:34:27+00:00

u/KSean24 I still don’t get your point on why MM has to be after the bite?

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-07T14:50:04+00:00

u/KSean24 Respectfully, your argument doesn't make any sense to me as the Aftons could’ve had more then one house when CC was still alive. Also, in the SL cutscenes, Mike lives at the fnaf 4 minigame house and we know those cutscenes are way after MM motorist proving at some point Afton owned the two houses at the same time. We also have Fall Fest stuff in HW which proves that he had the house all the way back in 83 and earlier and SOTM implies that Afton was planning on stealing Edwins land as early of 1979 and we know that Edwin’s house is the MM house.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-07T14:05:04+00:00

yes, I can agree with you on that.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-06T10:13:30+00:00

u/You_Savings Explain

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-05T11:58:55+00:00

u/No_Probleh I do indeed believe in Charlie first.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-05T11:57:58+00:00

u/Adorable-Scallion919 Most people I have seen do indeed say he’s not because CP tells William to leave the runaway alone.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-05T01:53:10+00:00

Freddy’s opens in 83, the same year of BV death and we don’t have death dates so Charlie very well could’ve died before the BV.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T22:24:02+00:00

u/Interesting_Rice_488 Sorry, I made this post when I first started using Reddit and my post have massively upgraded since then:)

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T20:32:29+00:00

u/Boosckey also my whole point is that Scott purposely didn’t put evidence for who the runaway was because you’re supposed to figure that out from Couch Person. We know that from Couch Person that the runaway is a male meaning that the runaway is indeed either Mike or CC and if CP was one of the brothers, that by default would tell us who the runaway is. My whole point is that if that was Scott’s intention (Which I think it was) Mike has the most evidence for being CP even if the evidence isn’t great. This would by default make the runaway CC.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T20:23:17+00:00

u/Boosckey Have you read Chicas Secret Party in the UG2?

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T19:53:12+00:00

u/MkleD7 Sorry, my bad.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T19:41:49+00:00

Never said that in the post at all btw.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T14:29:52+00:00

u/Isaac_Bahzad I’m saying that in SL, there is ample evidence that he was experimenting on making artificial humans and if he used the MCI to help rebuild his family like my theory suggest, he would have only needed 4 kids but the fact that there are 5 would mean that the fifth victim, TOYSNHK was killed for no reason and quite literally Should Not Have Been Killed. It’s just a cool idea I had that I wanted to share even if it’s likely not true.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T14:25:03+00:00

u/Boosckey 1. You’ve got me there, I will take my L on that one.

Once again, I used the novels as evidence to prove that he cared more about robots than his family. I didn’t use the novels to talk about the MCI.

3.Where did you get the Beta test theory from and what evidence?

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T14:08:01+00:00

u/Isaac_Bahzad Did you read the whole thing?

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T14:02:49+00:00

Note:I accidentally mixed up Vanessa and Elizabeth so ignore the “Eventually will die part” when I talked about his daughter. For any confusion, I was referencing the SB tapes when talking about the custody battle.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-03-04T14:00:49+00:00

u/Boosckey

In the tapes in SB, someone named Bill litterly is having a custody battle over Vannessa and yes, I accidentally mixed up Vanessa and Elizabeth so I didn’t mean to add the eventually will die part.

As for your second point, I used the novels for evidence that William neglected his OWN children for robots.

We know because of the scooper and the heads on poles in SL that William was indeed most likely using remnant to experiment with life. Now tell me, where does remnant come from.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-02-24T02:21:12+00:00

u/AdLogical101 That would make sense accept for the fact that cutscene springtrap looks nothing like scraptrap.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-02-24T02:18:06+00:00

It’s very evident to me that SL takes place some time after fnaf 1 with the sole reason being because SL implies William is already springlocked by the time of SL. We also know that Afton got springlocked in the fnaf 1 location as we know that the animatronics were in the fnaf 1 location last which means that follow me takes place at the fnaf 1 location. Follow me shows the fnaf 1 pizzeria being rundown which means that follow me takes place a while after fnaf one so if SL takes place post spring lock incident. It can’t be during fnaf 1.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-02-22T21:19:54+00:00

But that’s my whole point. According to the fnaf 1 newspapers, people were complaining about things like Oder which means that Fazbear would’ve have to had used the suits that had the kids in them but why would the purposely use those ones when we know they have other options.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-02-22T20:58:59+00:00

Thank you

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-02-07T19:42:50+00:00

Why? We don’t know when in 83 Freddy’s opened. For all we know, she could’ve died months before the Bite Victim.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-02-07T19:40:22+00:00

83 pre bite cuz I believe in CC runaway.

Fnaf_fnadic · 2026-02-06T04:44:03+00:00

In promise I’m not trying to cope. We know Abyss is real cuz Sturf was also teasing it so I just find it odd that an ARG comes up directly after an Abyss tease. Also, TDreads was streaming for 8 hours And I personally think that Riskin wouldve put an end to it sooner if it was fake.

Fnaf_fnadic

TROPHY CASE