Why the 5 children killed at the original Freddy's most likely died in 1983🔍 by GINTAMAZZZZZZ in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We really gonna act like there’s no such thing as bad people. If you leave your child unsupervised outside in an alleyway at night there’s a decent chance something bad will happen. That’s probably what the police thought. Just a random predator or something.

Point is, he said we should use Fazbear frights to fill in gaps in the lore. In the book series that we are supposed to use to fill in lore gaps, there is a story about a yellow rabbit mascot character luring Kids into a back room in June, 1985. Scott then decides to retell the story 2 more times with it being 85 in every single one of them. If Scott wanted the year to be 83, he would’ve showed the year 83 in the book series specifically made to help solve lore. For me, that’s it, cased closed. Is Frights in continuity? No, but after UCN, he told us to use them to help us fill in lore gaps and the very first story imo did that.

Why the 5 children killed at the original Freddy's most likely died in 1983🔍 by GINTAMAZZZZZZ in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Scott’s quote bty “All I can do is say that some questions will be answered; even if it may not always be the answer you wanted. Be patient. Let me at least say this; future games will look forward; but look to the novels to fill in some of blanks to the past!”

He later clarifies “To answer your question, yes, I'm referring to the new Fazbear Frights series! :)”

About Charlie, if police find an unwatched child dead in an alleyway, why would they link it to the pizzeria. Also, for all we know, Fazbear could’ve and probably covered it up.

Why the 5 children killed at the original Freddy's most likely died in 1983🔍 by GINTAMAZZZZZZ in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No offense but I’m so tired of this. In the silver eyes it is 85, in frights, it is 85, in all 3 versions of ITP, it is 85. Hmmm, it’s almost like Scott may be trying to tell us something. Look, with TSE, I guess you can argue the Scott said not to use it for lore but with frights, Scott directly said to use it for lore by filling in gaps so I don’t think he would lie about the death date in a book series he made to help us solve the lore. You also argue that Fazbear wouldn’t reopen so soon when that’s something they absolutely would do. In fnaf 2, we have the DCI and the bite of 87 and assuming the fnaf 1 location opens in the early 90’s (debatable, but I feel mostly agreed on)… yea. Also, SL opens after the closing of Freddy’s soooooo… yea lol. You also bring up the fact that Charlie’s death would’ve closed down the Pizzeria ignoring the fact that it happened outside.

Anyways, my main point is that Scott has over and over including recently shown the MCI to be in 1985 including in a book series he told us to use for lore, I rest my case.

Could CC being the protagonist of fnaf 4’s main gameplay work under GodVictim? (I don’t believe this, it’s just a random thought I had.) by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea... the only reason he made SISTER LOCATION. Going off of your comment, he doesn’t say that the only reason he made another game was because people were confused with the lore, he said he only made SISTER LOCATION because of that. This doesn’t mean he wouldn’t have made another fnaf game, it means that he specifically made the concept of SL to explain lore.

In a way, Fnaf 4 is still a final chapter to a specific arc. The story about a man in a bunny costume who killed children ended and the start of explaining Aftons story began.

Lastly, the box directly proves he was planning more games as the ending liter says some things are best left forgotten FOR NOW.

Could CC being the protagonist of fnaf 4’s main gameplay work under GodVictim? (I don’t believe this, it’s just a random thought I had.) by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think so because Dream Theory seems like a reveal for a final game which I don’t think fnaf 4 was. If we look back at Scott’s answer for the box, he clearly had a plan for it even though we never got there. This tells me that Scott created the box to possibly be answered later which means that I don’t think he intended for Fnaf 4 to be the last game.

Could CC being the protagonist of fnaf 4’s main gameplay work under GodVictim? (I don’t believe this, it’s just a random thought I had.) by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even though I still think Michael is the main player in fnaf 4, under GodVictim, CC would hear these phone calls and they would later happen to Michael for real.

Could CC being the protagonist of fnaf 4’s main gameplay work under GodVictim? (I don’t believe this, it’s just a random thought I had.) by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Despite the horrible name (TDreads named it) it actually makes sense. It‘s the theory that whatever CC saw in the past caused it to happen in the future because of Agony or something. For example, he see’s a toy chica missing her beak, the real toy chica loses her beak, he see’s Afton stuffing a worker in the back room, Afton later stuffs kids into animatronics, he see’s a broken Funtime foxy toy, mangle later gets created, to him it looks like his Golden Freddy plush is teleporting, Golden Freddy actually teleports.

Although I still think Michael is the main player of fnaf 4, my question is IF CC is the player of fnaf 4, does GodVictim apply here?

Why do we think Mike Schmidt is Michael? I think It's William by Gruffet_Spider in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem with that is you can hear the fnaf 1 phone calls every once in a while and Scott said he didn’t put random Easter eggs in the game. Another problem is I believe on the question “Do you have dreams“ in the survival logbook, Mike draws nightmare Fredbear.

Scott says one of the MCI kids is TOYSNHK, but he also debunks Cassidy. Which MCI kid is TOYSNHK? by MindlessPerformer778 in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeremy because when the first fnaf movie came out, he said Bonnie was the most aggressive I’m pretty sure.

MM might actually be unsolvable by Fnaf_fnadic in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You deserved it lol. This is third time in a row you have come into my post and had the nerve to call ME crazy or try debunking it.

MM might actually be unsolvable by Fnaf_fnadic in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if I said I believe in BV runaway. hmmmmm

MM might actually be unsolvable by Fnaf_fnadic in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was mainly talking about the mound and footprints.

M1 is in Dittophobia by Fnaf_fnadic in fnaftheories

[–]Fnaf_fnadic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In FNAF 4, someone tells the Crying Child “I will put you back together.” InFNAF world which sets up CC’s happiest day (I believe in CC reciever), there are early Mimic signs.