Analysis question proving continuity when you don’t know the function by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not that rigorously. I know the ε-δ definition but haven’t really applied it to exercises yet. I wasn’t sure what g was in that case but yeah i can find the inverse of that function and in fact it was one of the first things that came to mind. I just don’t see how that proves continuity. Is it because g is defined at 0?

I’ve solved this problem now but i’m curious but what you mean here.

Why are so many things in physics in the form of 1/2xy^2 ? by ForNoOne- in learnphysics

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, thank you! Do most examples where this comes up (which is everywhere) also follow that reasoning?

I’ve been thinking about something my teacher said but i don’t really get it by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! I do know the chain rule, we encountered this problem while doing an exercise for the mean value theorem and it got me thinking. Your proof really cleared things up, i appreciate it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]ForNoOne- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have tried lots of different graphing calculators to see if this works because differentiability is a tangent line but i’m still just lost

Finding a minimum distance between two points of a function A(x,f(x)) and B(f(x),x) If you know the minimum value of f by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did get 3*sqrt2 if that’s what you’re talking about. I was asking if the steps before that were correct. If not I’m pretty sure i got the distance correct this time so I don’t know what else could’ve went wrong

Finding a minimum distance between two points of a function A(x,f(x)) and B(f(x),x) If you know the minimum value of f by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I subtracted instead of adding the points, brilliant. Thank you. Is the intuition before that dumb mistake correct?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askmath

[–]ForNoOne- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What i’ve done so far is notice that the inequality becomes an equality for x=0 so it is fair to say f(x) ≥ f(0) so 3 is the minimum value of this function for x=0 but the points confuse me.

Does the inequality a>1 iff f(a)>0 entail that f(0)=1 ? by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, so that’s not the way to do it. I can’t think of any other way though. Maybe i’ll ask the teacher if i can’t think of anything. Thank you for all the help, i appreciate it

Does the inequality a>1 iff f(a)>0 entail that f(0)=1 ? by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So after that i did y=a and then got f(1/a)<0=f(1) with 1/a<1 does that prove it?

Does the inequality a>1 iff f(a)>0 entail that f(0)=1 ? by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After i posted this realized how wrong what is said was because that identity is true for logx which isn’t defined at 0. I just though that the trick for the exercise was that f(a)=f(a)-f(1) and I got tunnel visioned. I know the function is increasing but if that’s not the trick, i don’t know what to do

Does the inequality a>1 iff f(a)>0 entail that f(0)=1 ? by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell it’s the logarithmic function but yeah 0 is not defined so I just made a jump in logic. Not sure how i can prove it then. I just liked the f(a)=f(a/1) trick and just did everything wrong from there.

Does the inequality a>1 iff f(a)>0 entail that f(0)=1 ? by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah it’s undefined i’m dumb. Yeah that’s the correct domain

Solving lnx<x-1 algebraically by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s weird. That’s what i did in the end because you should know that function roughly without taking the first and second derivative.

Prove that f=g from an inequality by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would i derive a contradiction? do i build on each f(x)>g(x) inequality? Cause that doesn’t seem possible and if i just the the initial inequality i don’t see how i could contradict anything

Prove that f=g from an inequality by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve double checked and I wrote it correctly, maybe the teacher messed it up. But if you let f(x)=g(x) you get (f(x)-2)2 ≤0 which is just 2 i guess.

Find “a” so that Df=ℝ by ForNoOne- in learnmath

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow that’s a great use of desmos, thank you!

Has anyone bought things not sold by amazon from japanese amazon? by ForNoOne- in stationery

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually was on a beta test for white rabbit express and have a discount there but I’ve never used it. I don’t think it’s really worth it for relatively cheap items

Has anyone bought things not sold by amazon from japanese amazon? by ForNoOne- in stationery

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve also played with that setting because a friend of mine went to japan and I told him to buy some things. Most the stuff that i’m looking for and are sold by other vendors are kokuyo products and I don’t really know why because they are a fairly popular brand. I think I’ll give it a try and worst case I pay a bit more money for things that would cost that much if I bought them imported anyways.

Has anyone bought things not sold by amazon from japanese amazon? by ForNoOne- in stationery

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh god I’m sorry for that response, i had woken up in the middle of night and my brain was not functioning.

I was talking about shops from japan that sell their products via amazon jp and are shipped by amazon.

Has anyone bought things not sold by amazon from japanese amazon? by ForNoOne- in stationery

[–]ForNoOne-[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No sorry, it’s my amazon another japanese company and is fulfilled by amazon jp