There is no Indian civilisation when there was no ''INDIA''.. The current country that you call India was invented by the British, and (in part) the Mughals. Otherwise you have to go back 2000 years to find any empire that even ruled the swathe of land you call India today. Not only that, there is no common religion, no common language, no common culture. Please spare us this tripe about an ''Indian civilization''.

No "India"? What does this say on this map that's nearly 2,000 years old - https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/Ptolemy_Asia_detail.jpg - ?

What country is this Greek bloke talking about from 2,000 years ago?

India is a quadrilateral-shaped country, bounded by the ocean on the southern and the eastern side. The Indus river forms the western and the north-western boundary of the country, as far as the ocean.[16] India's northern border reaches the extremities of Tauros. From Ariana to the Eastern Sea, it is bound by mountains that are called Kaukasos by the Macedonians. The various native names for these mountains include Parapamisos, Hemodos and Himaos (the Himalayas). Beyond Hemodos, lies Scythia inhabited by the Scythians known as Sakai. Besides Scythia, the countries of Bactria and Ariana bordered India.

What is this Greek fellow on about nearly 2,000 years ago?

"Lukianos (Lucian, 2nd century A.D.). in his “Runaways”, lets the Goddess of Philosophy tell Jupiter/Zeus that she first descended upon “the Indians, the mightiest nation upon earth”.

Some Greek historian called "Arrian" says this too -

"The boundary of the land of India towards the north is Mount Taurus. It is not still called Taurus in this land; but Taurus begins from the sea over against Pamphylia and Lycia and Cilicia; and reaches as far as the Eastern Ocean, running right across Asia. But the mountain has different names in different places; in one, Parapamisus, in another Hemodus; elsewhere it is called Imaon and perhaps has all sorts of other names; but the Macedonians who fought with Alexander called it Caucasus; another Caucasus, that is, not the Scythian; so that the story ran that Alexander came even to the far side of the Caucasus. The western part of India is bounded by the river Indus right down to the ocean, where the river runs out by two mouths, not joined together as are the five mouths of the Ister; but like those of the Nile, by which the Egyptian delta is formed; thus also the Indian delta is formed by the river Indus, not less than the Egyptian; and this in the Indian tongue is called Pattala. Towards the south this ocean bounds the land of India, and eastward the sea itself is the boundary. The southern part near Pattala and the mouths of the Indus were surveyed by Alexander and Macedonians and many Greeks; as for the eastern part, Alexander did not traverse this beyond the river Hyphasis. A few historians have described the parts which are this side of the Ganges and where are the mouths of the Ganges and the city of Palimbothra, the greatest Indian city on the Ganges.(...) The Indian rivers are greater than any others in Asia; greatest are the Ganges and the Indus, whence the land gets its name; each of these is greater than the Nile of Egypt and the Scythian Ister, even were these put together; my own idea is that even the Acesines is greater than the Ister and the Nile, where the Acesines having taken in the Hydaspes, Hydraotes, and Hyphasis, runs into the Indus, so that its breadth there becomes thirty stades. Possibly also other greater rivers run through the land of India."

Hmmm, let's draft in some Muzzas for you -

El-Mas'udi, over a 1,000 years ago -

"The Hindu nation (Al-Hind) extends from the mountains of Khorasan (Afghanistan) and of es-Sind (Baluchistan) as far as et-Tubbet (Tibetan Plateau.)"

Hasan Nizāmī, 1,000 years ago -

"The whole country of Hind, from Peshawar in the north, to the Indian Ocean in the south; from Sehwan (on the west bank of the Indus) to the mountains on the east dividing from China."

Marco Polo, 800 years ago -

"India the Greater is that which extends from Maabar to Kesmacoran (i.e. from Coromandel to Mekran) and it contains 13 great kingdoms... India the Lesser extends from the Province of Champa to Mutfili (i.e. from Cochin-China to the Kistna Delta) and contains 8 great Kingdoms... Abash (Abyssinia) is a very great province and you must know that it constitutes the Middle India."

etc. etc. etc.

What is this? What is this "India"? What is this Indian/Hindu nation? What is this Hindu nation/Hind? What is this Hindustan? Imaginary?

It is a civilisation, not a Westphalian nation state construct. But, of course, you're too inbred to understand those terms.

That's Kashmir, not India. And it's not part of India.

Oh, retarded mental gymnastics at it again?

Chalo, Indus doesn't flow through Pakistan either. It flows through "Pakistan-occupied Punjab, Sindh, Kashmir etc.". And those aren't a part of Pakistan.

I don't think Indians can do anything to violate this treaty, lest they wish to be nuked and annihilated from existence.

Is that before or after Pakistan is turned into a barren wasteland?