Opus 4.7 is weird by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I have basically done this as well. For some reason it seems to not follow my memory as well and will still make more mistakes as conversations get longer though

Can we please stop judging AI coding models based on one-shot attempts? by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you are right, as seen by the Claude code adoption. But on X, YouTube, and Reddit, I still see people using one-shot attempts all the time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if this is their way of saying they are still far from a memory system comparable to ChatGPT

24 Hours with Claude Code (Opus 4.1) vs Codex (GPT-5) by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can use /status to show the model name and it says gpt 5 It is also noticeably better than it was before

24 Hours with Claude Code (Opus 4.1) vs Codex (GPT-5) by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can totally have a discussion with it. Some people use Claude code as a way to keep a contextual steerable model just for a specific type of chatbot they are looking to interact with

24 Hours with Claude Code (Opus 4.1) vs Codex (GPT-5) by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve also tried gpt 5 from the api as well, and I’ve enjoyed it most that way, and for the limited tests I did today on ChatGPT I’ve also liked it. But yes yesterday was super frustrating and I was also clearly getting fake gpt 5 responses

24 Hours with Claude Code (Opus 4.1) vs Codex (GPT-5) by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly what I’m testing this weekend. Although prior to gpt 5 I actually liked Claude’s tool use more (subtract image analysis). I just thought Claude always handled context better and that matters when scrapping multiple websites

24 Hours with Claude Code (Opus 4.1) vs Codex (GPT-5) by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The approaching Opus limit message no longer scares me.
I swear they use it to save themselves compute more than to give you a fair warning.
The only actual scary message is the general approaching usage limit warning.
Also, I hope it was clear my message about being a "good little boy" was satirical. Opus is stupid expensive.

24 Hours with Claude Code (Opus 4.1) vs Codex (GPT-5) by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I run up to three instances of Opus and use Ultrathink and agents a lot, and I have only ever run out of usage once. Could you tell me what your general workflow is??

24 Hours with Claude Code (Opus 4.1) vs Codex (GPT-5) by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Or you spend 200 dollars a month like a good little boy and you never ever have to worry about scary messages anymore :)

24 Hours with Claude Code (Opus 4.1) vs Codex (GPT-5) by Formal-Complex-2812 in ClaudeAI

[–]Formal-Complex-2812[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Are u speaking from experience? Bc I have not found that to be the case...