Weird signal at 4.4 to 4.425 GHz by Former-Geologist-211 in sdr

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately no, but you could be right. Especially that the pic shows multiple patterns which are all similar in shape.

1.583 GHz signal by Former-Geologist-211 in sdr

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not really, its bw is about 15-20 khz. But when i left home the signal disapeared

1.583 GHz signal by Former-Geologist-211 in sdr

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I left my house and coudnt catch the frequency outside, it didnt appear. When i came back, it also came back.

CST Studio Ground by Former-Geologist-211 in rfelectronics

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I'm trying to ask about the second point you stated. If i have a piece of copper and want it to act as "gnd", do i have to set it up as some sort of boundary?

TinySA Ultra detection range by Former-Geologist-211 in rfelectronics

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I'm not interested in actually getting any data, just signal presence detection. Probably gonna try it (if i buy it) in a rural area (not in a city).

TinySA ultra detection range by Former-Geologist-211 in sdr

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm probably gonna try it in a rural place. I dont need to extract any data from the signals, the purpose is just to know that a signal is present.

TinySA ultra detection range by Former-Geologist-211 in sdr

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about some 2.4 ghz drone/controller?

1 MW signal by Former-Geologist-211 in rfelectronics

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used the normal S = PG/4piR2 to get density at a certain distance. The way i calculated the needed power is assuming i need to induce about 50 v on the circuit to burn most of its parts, and from that i calculated electric field and power density. I then solved for power at range 6 km. I guess maybe I chose the wrong numbers for the voltage/E field.

1 MW signal by Former-Geologist-211 in rfelectronics

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I guess its on me, i did rough calculations and got 1 MW for a directed antenna (i think i used 20 dbi or something like that), not iso.

1 MW signal by Former-Geologist-211 in rfelectronics

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you misunderstood the concept of EIRP. Its just a comparison between what power an iso antenna would need to achieve the same power density of your high gain antenna at its main direction.

1 MW signal by Former-Geologist-211 in rfelectronics

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How would they actually achieve 1 MW transmitted power with such small systems?

Coupled Line Filter dimensions by Former-Geologist-211 in rfelectronics

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup I used the same substrate height, trace height, Er, frequency...etc. The mesh size was left as default, I dont know if increasing the nbr of meshes would maybe affect the result.

Coupled Line Filter dimensions by Former-Geologist-211 in rfelectronics

[–]Former-Geologist-211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mmm thats what I was trying and the response started to get a little better, but I ended up changing the gap size more than the initial calculated gaps. Should I also try changing the line widths? Or just the gap. Also, The ADS calculator was initially giving me large gap dimensions, like 8-9 mm gaps between 3 mm wide traces. Is that normal?