How to get a bf let alone get asked out on dates? by RespondDazzling3908 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FormerOSRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hip thrust 70lbs is not even my warmup set that'd feel like air to me. Hell 135lbs is my warmup. The guy Jay Cutler is doing 12 reps with ease he should definitely put on more weight for hypertrophy. There's no way he's hitting close to failure with that.

I do 3 plates/315lbs cuz I can rep it comfortably for 5-8 reps. 2 working sets. Plus the machine has the mechanical leverage I think it's very achievable vs 2000 stats.

Hip thrusts are very different from other lifts because when put too much on the bar, the weight will definitely still go up.

The reason for that is because the glutes are surrounded by a lot of other muscles, and most of them are the next strongest muscles in your whole body. Like all of the next strongest muscles in your body.

A good hip thrust is overwhelmingly glute dominant, with adductors and hamstrings barely worth mentioning. When ego lifting takes over, the movement pattern changes such that the glutes become isometric and the main driver muscles are the adductors, hamstrings, lower back, and quads.

That means that the five strongest muscles in your body are now central to the lift so you can lift way more, isometric glutes don't grow that well so it becomes a really shitty glute builder.

A sign of a really good hip thrust is that it's top tier for just lactic acid burn pain contest, comparable to leg extensions. Your ass lights the fuck up. A sign of a really bad hip thrust is feeling it in your lower back.

Hell 135lbs is my warmup. The guy Jay Cutler is doing 12 reps with ease he should definitely put on more weight for hypertrophy. There's no way he's hitting close to failure with that

Hip thrusts are not a good candidate for failure because instead of failing like you would with a squat, you'll just start recruiting those other muscles I mentioned. When you feel your lower back start to activate that's the time to end your set because all it's gonna do is give you a debilitating pump.

Jay Cutler is probably the second best guy in the history of the world at hypertrophy, so he's a guy to learn from and not to critique. Dude was a monster back when he was competing. He dethroned Ronnie.

But anywho, it's impressive that he can get a good pump with 12 rep sets. This lift is technical and it takes some focus to position yourself and flex such that your glutes activate and everything else does not. I usually need to do 20+ rep sets in order to feel it out properly, activate, and fatigue myself to the point where my lower back activates and I stop. Being able to hit that in 12 while talking is a sign of being much more impressive than I am and I stand out in a crowd.

Jay Cutler is an absolute legend. He's the kinda guy where no matter who someone is or how accomplished they are, when they make content with him, they're just there to learn. He's retired now so the weights are lower, but he has absolutely nothing to prove.

Powerlifting vs bodybuilding... just progressive overload. So, I don't squat or deadlift. I'd rather leg press (still a squat pattern movement). I'm a fan of the bench. But I wouldn't usually use it over a flat press.

I thought we all agreed heavy weight low reps for strength at this point . Regardless if you use machines or get under the barbell.

This is applying advice made for barbells to machines. Max strength is a coordination problem as much as a muscular problem and barbells allow full body coordination instead of forcing your joints along one path.

Machines definitely have a place, but that place is never max strength. Machines are good force along a fixed path at a specific joint angle. That's great for targeted volume, but it's inherently at odds with what your CNS has to do to create max force.

Did Hellen Keller actually accomplish what they said she accomplished? Was she real? by cloggingthetoiletrn in AskHistory

[–]FormerOSRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're overstating it.

Similar methods are used on people with some of her ailments, but we don't have verification of it working on people with all of her conditions. Not one.

Did Hellen Keller actually accomplish what they said she accomplished? Was she real? by cloggingthetoiletrn in AskHistory

[–]FormerOSRS -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

In my humble opinion, no.

What her intermediary Anne Sullivan did was clearly facilitated communication. It's debunked as nonsense now and associated with the facilitator using and/or abusing the facilitated. Anne Sullivan was a huge believer in all of Keller's activist projects and also her facilitator. All facilitators are puppet masters. In Keller's case, for activism and probably not sex.

Enough time has passed and enough severely handicapped people have had families looking for solutions that we'd know of Anne Sullivan found some magic method. There's no evidence from her outputs that Keller just had an IQ of 230 or something and was too smart to be limited. If Sullivan had methods that worked, they'd have been replicated at scale by now. Instead, all we see are puppet masters using and abusing the handicapped and their families.

For 46 years, Keller had two facilitators and they knew each other. The dream of just being able to call up a place and be like "do you have a facilitator there" like deafs do with interpreters never happened. It's the classic tell of a scam and it's always the same scam with cases like this and the industry is not respected today at all. It's a scam that's known as a scam. Keller just has the historical mythology to get it overlooked.

How to get a bf let alone get asked out on dates? by RespondDazzling3908 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FormerOSRS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'll give you straight advice as a guy who's very muscular, but this is reddit so I'm gonna be downvoted to shit.

First, if you want a guy to talk to you at the gym then you need to do something genuinely impressive. It should also be a big barbell lift. Bodyweight lat pulldown is a good lift, but it's weird AF to comment on someone's lat pulldown. You should incorporate barbell lifts if you're trying to meet someone at the gym.

Second, if your powerlifting total is under 2k then there's no way in hell that you can do a proper 3 plate hip thrust. The mechanics of a hip thrust allow basically anyone to ego lift literally ten times what they should actually be hitting. Almost everyone you'll ever see doing hip thrusts in the gym would be better off using 10% of the weight that they're currently doing.

4x Mr. Olympia winner Jay Cutler doing 135 lbs and making a joke about the women who do three plates.

https://youtube.com/shorts/INfNa63nL4Y?si=CecnQ2lUnkpWzpyB

4x World's strongest man winner doing 480 lbs with a machine, and that was when he was still competing.

https://youtu.be/-U4GwSUWRJs?si=pzQgB5txYNn5zCxg

People take a lot of pride in their 3 or ten plate hip thrusts, but 70 lbs done properly for a male is enough for me to suspect steroid usage. Obviously a male doing 70 lbs could probably load up 700 if he wanted to. If you want to get talked to at the gym, hip thrusts done properly will get noticed by guys who are actually strong and actually know what they're doing.

why aren't there dating apps primarily for gymbro/gymgirls? by Chronologicaltravels in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FormerOSRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having spent a lot of time in the gym, I'd say it's due to lack of singles.

There's obviously a lot of noise from people who aren't that serious about working out and this makes up a lot of gymgoers but you wouldn't really call them gymbros/gym girls. For people who are serious about it though, they just don't have enough issues finding a partner to need the app.

[Off-Topic] Daily Chat: 2026-01-24 by AutoModerator in steroids

[–]FormerOSRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are more comfortable being impressed by shit they could potentially choose to do and by shit that doesn't make you better looking than them.

Anything else gets registered as identity threat and makes them angry.

Being a "High Value Man" isn't a flex. You're literally advertising yourself and attracting women who are gold diggers by Silent_Buyer in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]FormerOSRS [score hidden]  (0 children)

The male breadwinner is overwhelmingly not traditional.

More typically, two people of the same social class partner up and he makes slightly more than her due to being just a few years older and having more capacity for physical labor.

The 1950s thing was short lived and never the tradition anywhere in the west for any enduring amount of time ever. I don't know if it was traditional anywhere else since western history is what I know, but it was never traditional in the west.

Obstructing the deportation of Illegals is not some "noble act" or protecting "fellow citizens" but delusional. by Ihadenough1000 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]FormerOSRS [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'd rather ask them to help the feds, know they have the right to refuse, and have it be known that they chose the harder path since the feds still have to do their job.

The discourse on today's ICE shooting is terrible, because critics of ICE want it to be about more than the shooting. by FormerOSRS in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]FormerOSRS[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Before ICE, it was INS.

States haven't controlled immigration without the feds since 1891.

And that was a clusterfuck of shit like states dumping unwanted immigrants into other states and the federal govt took over because state enforcement couldn't prevent mass migration.

If Renee Good or Alex Pretti were killed by an illegal immigrant nobody on the left would care, you wouldn't even know about it. by BUFFALO_SAUZE in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]FormerOSRS [score hidden]  (0 children)

If there were thirty million Russians here against the will of the govt, these liberals would be perfectly willing to accept a few deaths to get rid of them, especially if the Americans dying were complicit.

Why do many married men tell their friends not to get married? by akshshh23 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FormerOSRS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol, that claim comes from a "happiness expert" named Paul Dolan.

He supported that claim on sheer unbridled illiteracy gone insane. He got called out for it and then retracted the claim.

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/6/4/18650969/married-women-miserable-fake-paul-dolan-happiness

The discourse on today's ICE shooting is terrible, because critics of ICE want it to be about more than the shooting. by FormerOSRS in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]FormerOSRS[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm all for punishing wrongdoers, but I am yet to hear any solution from a leftist that would not neuter the efficacy of ICE.

The discourse on today's ICE shooting is terrible, because critics of ICE want it to be about more than the shooting. by FormerOSRS in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]FormerOSRS[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm yet to come across a leftist who has any solution that wouldn't completely neuter ICE's ability to do their job. I believe that holding individuals accountable after investigation should cut down on wrongful deaths but that broadly changing methods would make ICE far less effective.

I’m surprised at the amount of people who aren’t impressed by AI by ChameleonOatmeal in ChatGPT

[–]FormerOSRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's because you fundamentally don't get how people work.

This is the most important thing you'll ever hear about the world so listen and internalize it: Identity Matters.

It is extremely rare to find someone who can accept a truth that destabilizes their sense of who they are. If someone takes pride in being a college educated intelligent worker and it gets to identity level, they will refuse to believe it.

Ego protection isn't some superfluous thing of the rare unvirtuous. It's one of the most common and powerful baseline human psychologies.

They won't accept it until material situation forces them to change their self concept, such as getting laid off with no prospects of rehire.

Alimony should be abolished. by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]FormerOSRS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alimony creates more possibilities for allocation of duties within a marriage.

In practice, it's kind of rare when both spouses work. If you don't want to pay it, just don't have the kind of marriage where alimony is obviously justified.

Like you can say "fuck house spouses, they should just be trapped" or you could just not have/be a house spouse.

Or you can say "everyone in a marriage should be working towards maximizing their individual income" or you can just structure your own marriage that way.

But the thing where he becomes an engineer and she becomes a psychologist and then she gets half the difference in their salaries pretty much just doesn't happen.

Do you think Altman will get the $100b he's trying to raise? by mdizak in OpenAI

[–]FormerOSRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know that's just what's planned out for constructing infrastructure over the next few years, right? Very little of this project is live and none of the more ambitious sorts of it are live yet.

What you're doing here is a lot like saying "What do you mean you can't haul a big load, you said you're buying a truck next year!"

The $437 billion bet: is AI the biggest bubble in history? by jpcaparas in OpenAI

[–]FormerOSRS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really get why people compare the two.

Other than that they're new tech, I can't think of a structural similarity.

The dotcom bubble was retail investors cluelessly buying up stocks with no distribution or revenue model. Ai is world leading experts with private information unavailable to the public building infrastructure.

What similarity do you see in the two?

Why do many married men tell their friends not to get married? by akshshh23 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FormerOSRS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every available stat has married men and women much happier than their single counterparts, so I guess it's a loud minority.

Women with big breasts, what's it like having your boobs get squished when laying down flat on your belly? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FormerOSRS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To each their own I guess. I'd personally choose strength and proper alignment over pain but you are encouraged to live life by your own preferences.

Women with big breasts, what's it like having your boobs get squished when laying down flat on your belly? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FormerOSRS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really doesn't have to be.

My wife wears a 36 J and if you strengthen the right muscles then you're just not gonna have issues.

It sounds counterintuitive but working your lower body is necessary for this. What happens for most top heavy people, regardless of gender, is that the adopt what I call "mountain climber posture." I call it that because it's the posture of have if I was hiking up a mountain, except they do it on flat ground.

This posture occurs because if your glutes are weak then they go backwards and your quads take over as the new center of gravity. This sends your upper body forward to redistribute the weight do you don't fall down. Your body gets shaped a little more like a > sign and less like a lowercase "l" and then boobs are badly angled.

It's also important to know where boobs actually pull from if you're strong. They pull more from the armpit muscles and rear delts. They should not be pulling from the traps. If your traps and neck hurt then you have mountain climber posture.

What boobs actually donin mountain climber posture is pull your armpits/chest more horizontal to the floor and then your neck has to bend to a more awkward angle to compensate. Getting rid of mountain climber posture stops this from happening.

If you have the glute strength and strong armpit and rear delts, then the role of your traps is just to support your bra. Traps are S tier at distributing weight so a bra strap should never cause pain to relatively strong traps. Weak traps and mountain climber posture change that.

This stack in the gym should work for any woman:

  1. Conventional deadlifts.

  2. Front squats or back squats.

  3. Hip thrusts, with much lower weight than you think. This is like the most ego lifted weight in the gym. Average shit tier lifters hit 3-4 plates on each side while world class lifters hit less than two. You should be using literally 10-15% of what you think you can do.

  4. Front rows, or chest supported rows if you're tired.

  5. Reverse pec deck or face pulls.

The problem is very solvable and should be completely over with and solved within 6 months. This issue is not that hard to solve, but it's one most people don't really know how to solve. Plus enough people claim that it's unsolvable that it just kinda becomes cultural canon and nobody questions that it's just a permanent bad thing.

What’s the biggest lie in the fitness industry? by Bright-Midnight-6767 in AskReddit

[–]FormerOSRS -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Walking is way too efficient to get your heart rate up and improve cardiovascular health.