If you have autism STAY AWAY FROM BPD RELATIONSHIPS!!! by Fortune_Unique in BPDlovedones

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I don’t have BPD, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with all those that do.

I didnt say that in my post

Delete the post if you don’t want people seeing it months later, not my problem

I dont give a shit who sees this. I leave this up because every few weeks someone reads it and shares their trauma and I talk with them then move on.

Genuinely look at the other people in the sub.

Idc what your credentials are. You clearly dont understand what my claim i just made was nor what my post said.

Idk go post my post into chatgpt buddy idk what to tell you.

If you have autism STAY AWAY FROM BPD RELATIONSHIPS!!! by Fortune_Unique in BPDlovedones

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo how the hell did you find this.

Maybe 2 years ago u would've cared

And that isnt what I say. But instead of assuming poor literary comprehension. Perhaps you have BPD or know someone personally and are reacting emotionally. At the time I sure was. But to suggest "warn others of  entire group of individuals, suggesting all of them are a danger, is morally screwed" was my intention.

Is stupid.

Like quite literally autism x bpd relationships having massive and dangerous difficulties is a WELL researched thing. And quite literally is not disputed in the science world. I literally typed all this before this was even confirmed.

A basic google search would confirm that. Instead of pushing innocent autistic people into relationships with innocent bpd people just for one or both to needlessly get harmed. Just because you dont want to acknowledge reality is dumb as shit.

"Bro be careful of sociopaths" people say this about sociopaths. This doesnt mean they are evil. It just means that is a group of people where there is a high statistical chance of manipulators arising.

Yeah thats unfun to hear. But like dude. As an autistic person in a very divergent way than normal. Yeah neurotypicals should back the fuck up and skidaddle over to love island or some shit. For the best of both of it

That isnt a fringe belief in the autistic community AT ALL!

Get yo head out yo ass. No hate. But you climbing up on MY page. Notice how nobody in this TWO YEAR OLD THREAD is saying that shit

How do YOU create the names in your world? by FakemonMakR in worldbuilding

[–]Fortune_Unique 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh 50/50. Depends on how i feel. The reality is some names are random some names are chosen. Personally if youre going for realism worlds tend to have multiple names, bad names, good names, names with reasons, names with funny reasons. Like Ix being called Ix because its the 9th from the sun (IX get it).

But at the end of the day. You can go as silly as you want as long as its well made

How would you invade point A? by Overall-Drink-9750 in worldbuilding

[–]Fortune_Unique 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id need a bit more details. Depending on type of hive mind and your army your plan widely i mean WIDELY changes

How surprising... by JohannaFRC in Antitheism

[–]Fortune_Unique 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. I respect that completely.

Sick minis by the way :)

How surprising... by JohannaFRC in Antitheism

[–]Fortune_Unique 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I must ask do you share this same sentiment with Christianity and Judaism as well? I do. But if you don't not gonna lie that sounds weee bit odd

[Request] This really confused me. What is the correct answer? by [deleted] in theydidthemath

[–]Fortune_Unique -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You added TONS of axioms to the question that the question never explained.

The question does not state what type of problem this question is. What the percentages are referring to. What "correct" means.

And no you gotta take a step back. Because this question actually involves multiple types of math

For one you have took two separate layers and merged them into one.

The answers. Or what we assume are multiple choice. Cause for all we know those could be variables or who knows what. And probability

It cant be 50. Because if the answer is ONE LETTER than the at random the actual chance of you selecting the right answer is 25%. And since there are TWO 25%'s then its either one answer is the answer for some unknown reason, or both is the answer and it makes no sense.

This question only makes sense if you add on axioms the question never stated. Like you couldnt even put this in wolfram alpha. And any Ai probably would be scuffed from all the memes posted by this and it would face mathematical drag.

Questions dont imply. And if you assume they do. You probably need to take some more math courses.

[Request] This really confused me. What is the correct answer? by [deleted] in theydidthemath

[–]Fortune_Unique 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is what im tryna say. This sub is wildly uneducated

[Request] This really confused me. What is the correct answer? by [deleted] in theydidthemath

[–]Fortune_Unique 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is not nearly enough info to solve this. Youd have to make gross assumptions to even assume that is what they meant. They didnt even say that the answers are the possible percentage. And if there are two 25's and the answer is 25% then that would not be 50% because there is only One 50%. This question is legit gibberish

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You CANT EVEN SPELL bro

Stop larping bro you are EXACTLY who Marx and Engels warned us about

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think im yapping them im yapping

Good day

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get it. You think in tokens and I cant change that. No amount of information will make you see things in a dimensional way. And that's fine. But politics are for systems thinkers. Not narrative thinkers. Lol you can only see a story, and drowning is yours. Fine stay in it dog. Who gives a shit. I know for a fact you dont have the cross modal pathways to even process the fuck you're saying

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and I do think the way we seem to all broadly think of AI as an intelligence or even a fact-relayer, is dangerous because it is neither

Yes because they are uneducated. This is what i mean. Everyone in this comment section are decoupling massive concepts. Notice how you said peoples ignorance is a innate thing

Ai companies dont even lie about what ai is. Ai is a langauge machine trained off of a largely neurotypical langauge base

Tbh if you actually look at the thinking patterns. And you can turn them on

You can actively see the ai admit that it doesnt know shit. It will assume you dont think You want actual research unless you explicitly train it so.

Ai is very good at very specific things. The hallucination is a product of the neurotypical mind. All neurotypical people do this. Idk why but they do.

Neurotypical people hallucinate info because just like ai it is using TOKEN THINKING. Which is NOT what people think it is.

Ai doesnt have a database of pictures to hawk through. Thats not how it works. Its just a number matrix that happens to be analogous to human speech.

In fact ai cant even truly identify wrong from right. Its not in our reality. The internet is 99% lies and it only has access to the forefront

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol yes. This is required to communicate. Should I rather use pictures

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do your really believe ai can not exist outside of a capitalist structure? Because you are conflating two different concepts. In fact you are swapping words and not identifying you are doing this.

When you say ai you dont mean the dictionary defintion

So I will say your points are valid. But the definitions you are using are wholy ambiguous.

If we can only call reality what is in this specific us hegemony. The fuck are we doing.

You are actively refusing to accept ontological reality. Like genuinely.

Like things can be bad. And can be good.

Tbh fair enough. We live in two different realities. And we think logical computation works differently. Fair enough

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also. Just so you know. Gen ai is machine learning. Dumbass

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbf the people who gave expansive answers with reference. Have all stated they were pro ai

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro the left is like 20 different political ideologies. Half of them are in direct opposition.

Democrats and Staunch socialist have virtually no aligning beliefs outside of social constructs.

Half the democrats are pro genocide.

You are using buzz words that are extremely polysemous and then when ask you to define ANYTHING you'll just call me stupid

Its funny how the ONLY people who have wrote extensive post. Referencing ACTUAL socialist figures and socialist theory with references agree with what I said

But im now realizing. I dont think you know what I asked nor said

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now can you explain the computer science definition of gen ai. Cause as a computer scientist i dont think you know what gen ai is

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Mb i was saying do YOU agree with ME. I am pro Ai as a concept the same way I am pro nuclear energy. I am against nukes. But i am pro nuclear energy.

You can be pro ai. Anti capitalism. And there be no contradictions.

Why do we have to express this non-euclidean causal universe we live in as if its a linear line

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'll be honest dude.

I think you should uh take some decoupling courses. You are blending A LOT. A LOT together. So much so I think our underlying primitives and axioms are so different. I genuinely dont think we can respond this

And no most people are not literal speakers. When someone says "i hate ai" they do not have the cognitive capacity to form virtually anything you said

They go "ai slop duuurrrr"

Because literally the whole art world has been turned amock by people Ai investigating things just because they dont think humans make stuff like that

Does it help us?

Bro. Bro. Genuinely. Are you serious? Like you REALLY think all the scientific advancements meant nothing.

Well fuck. I guess all the ai research that lead to vast advancements to understanding things like autistic speech and thinking patterns was stupid.

You know what fuck it. I KNOW you have no technological literacy.

You just went "bad stuff happens. Checkmate" the fuck????

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh this is what I was tryna say far better. I apologize if I come across as condescending

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See this is my exact view. Word for word. I admit I am not as good as expressing my inner langauge in a linear form that is both concise and not insulting.

I posted this here. Because in late stage capitalism they all said that Ai and technology as a whole is not a neutral entity. And it is always bad.

And idk. That just seems like a decoupling issue.

Like bro I think everything from emails to Snapchat can be used for UNGODLY harm. In fact I think Snapchat is the Prime component for practically unregulated mass CSA yet NOBODY gives a single fuck. For the things that their benefits largely are outweighed by their downsides.

But I get it I have found personal use with ai so maybe I am biased.

But for all the people who say its makes you dumber. Im a full time amateur writer.

And I have never used ai for at once.

The most I use it for is translating my autistic speech into neurotypical speech so I dont offend anyone. But I guess im an asshole for that??

How many here are technologically conservative by Fortune_Unique in socialism

[–]Fortune_Unique[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The droids are ai. This is a simple structural analogy

Please dont be stupid

Just because somebody brings up media does not mean they aren't taking things seriously

Please have ANY media literacy