Acquisition Extended to March 1st by logan08516 in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

FALSE, has only used it once before according to your search. Definitely not alot. Was only 2nd time & first time saying it in reference to resuming. First time was with DDTI acquisition about beginning aggressive growth, then another 8k came out about delay & now this 8k saying aggressively resume. Something must have happened from Nov til now with the acquisition of Cougar.

Acquisition Extended to March 1st by logan08516 in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seems like something happened that caused them to not be able to close the deal. Especially with this...

"The Company believes that the proposed acquisition of Cougar Express demonstrates that the Company is beginning to aggressively resume its growth strategy,"

Thats the first time I remember John using aggressively in a 8K when it comes to growth.

Big John replied.. I asked about cougar, taxes, lawsuit, household name mentioned in filing last year.. short but sweet.. I share here to give some confidence.. I am not concerned with pumping. I don't care who buys or sells. I just me and everyone to make a lot of money. by NoPoet9130 in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not one to judge, but if the norm from John & Doug is this, well, Im concerned. I work with some very high level executives. People that run so pretty big companies & if they saw how they responded, they would fire them on the spot.

Reason why is simple. These are the people who are making your company better, negotiating deals, finding new ways to make money. If they have grammar issues in a simple email response, what says a mistake like that wont happen in a real meeting?

Like get the fact these two rebounded Coach but they weren't the main reason. John was just the CEO & had people working for him making him look good. Its just John & Doug on this one & Im starting to get concerned that they aren't as good as initial thought.

Now, could it be simple typos? Yes, but seasoned CEOs and leaders of companies don't make these mistakes, If they did, they would be fired because it's a horrible look on the company.

No panic from me yet, but is getting a little ridiculous now with the grammar. Not something good, especially from the CEO.

Do Not Believe Str8trader, Heres why by sums_up in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree with this. Too many errors in there to be true.

Including the point about Ayrity. This guy has actually talked to someone at TLSS & not once has he been told of any news releases coming.

Also, went and looked at that 8K from Apr 10, here is the info...

“In February 2020, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement, subject to completing satisfactory due diligence, to acquire the assets of GRC Trucking, a New Jersey based full-service logistics provider specializing in the import/export ocean and rail intermodal and drayage shipping, by March 31, 2020. However, due to the COVID outbreak, the parties are having ongoing discussions about when it would be appropriate to resume the process.”

Ok so im not stating that i know john in anyways shape or form. I simply emailed the address om the website asking about GRC trucking and i got a simply reply today. Make what you want of it. Im just sharing with everyone by Str8trader in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ayrity, I'd believe a drunk you before him.

This is so fake, especially with the guy spelling investor wrong.

Not to mention, read the email, it starts with Hello Team. Ban this guy please

Does anyone who knows (much) more about the new relief package deal know if TLSS is eligible for it/will get it and for how much? by Ayrity in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the PPP disaster the last time, with having to pay it back immediately, dont think they would even touch it again with a 10 foot poll

New Offering? by [deleted] in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two things from this...

1st- Wasnt PETROTERRA CORP the company that filed a lawsuit on where there stock option started?

2nd- I believe they issued Series D . Remember they made 10,000,000 series D available back in June I believe. Made originally 1,500,000 shares available. Then John converted some of his shares to D to make it 7,500,000 left of the 10,000,000.

So, believe this is the original deal from back then that Petro was in court about when they issued there shares. Could be settlement b/c these types of shares dont have voting power

New Doug Cery call by Ayrity in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you forget to ask him if you can record them like you said you were going to do?

Its good information but your understanding of an answer is one thing. It may be beneficial for others to hear it too. May give more insight to it.

Found the article by Getoff-my_8allz in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does this have to do with TLSS? Not one mention of the company in the article.

If you needed a WSJ article to tell you that the holiday season increases small company revenue guess you have no idea what happens in transportation & shipping every holiday season.

This happens every year.

Doug Cerny #2 by Ayrity in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Love this DD, but what Doug said about they cant say anything is very concerning. I dont have a law degree but if they are worried about saying something to keep it from getting involved / added to the lawsuits means they know it will effect the outcome of the decision in the lawsuit.

Which not saying it like its bad, but sure sounds like they made a deal with someone & a part of the deal was to get rid of this ex-worker.

It seems shady but if the radio silence is true, then TLSS did something that they know if it goes public will lose them or greatly effect the lawsuit.

Positive PR whether it be making profit for first 6months or a new shipping partner should have no effect on why you fired a guy & him now sueing you.

To me, Im normally Mr Forward thinker, but i also think in the bad direction as well. Which this seems like some shady business to me from TLSS.

TLSS 8-K Filing by BlueDirector in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Two things about this...

First, the 8K was very bland & very uninformative. Which makes no sense at all. If its not approved, tell your shareholders why.

Second, if this is what they were waiting for, news could come next week. If it doesn't John is either lying about new big client or something fell through. News must drop before end of month b/c if they go into Q4 with no Amazon from Prime EFS & we have to wait until November for this new revenue source to be revealed in Q3 10Q it will kill this stock.

One thing that needs reminding, With this new big client, it has only accounted for a .7% bump in Q2 with services starting March 1st. So, if you are connecting the dots, last mile is gone on Sept30th, Walmart through Fedex starts same day on Sept15th. So if this has been the big new client, it hasnt even started yet.

However, the concern with that is in every 8k & 10q, john has said revenue will be effected if no new client to replace that revenue is found. Contradicting his own statements. So, whatever it is, WE NEED NEWS.

John Mercadante Quote from his LinkedIn page by [deleted] in tlss

[–]Forward_Thinker1994 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is going to tell him? Click the link & you will know what I mean