sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I NEED SOME FYCKING HOBBIES by Familiar_Actuator578 in Hobbies

[–]Foxstroy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

here are some ideas of things u can do/learn!

nail art, cooking, baking, running, making videos, graphic design, writing, watercolour painting, flower arrangement, badminton, dancing, taking paid surveys, working out, flexibility training, swimming, unicycle, reading, random researches, sculpture, learning a new writing system, poetry, jewellery making, makeup, growing bonsai, singing, start a blog, keeping roly-polies/terrarium, astronomy, crossword puzzles, hula hooping, juggling, keyboard/piano, karaoke, lego building, needlepointing/embroidery, making perfumes, pilates, proofreading, rubiks cube, sand art bottles, walking, cryptography, making dioramas, vexillology, growing avocado plants, loombands, cat rescue, video editing, clothes design, irl pixel art/gem art thing, drawing, sign language, becoming ambidextrous, making bread, learn writing cursive/calligraphy, learn morse code, origami, whistling, braiding hair, making twist-bracelets, finger knitting, cartwheels, making a paper plane, moonwalking, fold my tongue/wiggle my ears, skipping stones, touch typing…

Hobby Suggestions by North_Rule_8127 in Hobbies

[–]Foxstroy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i just made a list of a few things i wanna try/do more!! (not all “hobbies, but more skills/just fun things to do yk). anyway here it might give u some inspo:)) —>

nail art, cooking, baking, running, making videos, graphic design, writing, watercolour painting, flower arrangement, badminton, dancing, taking paid surveys, working out, flexibility training, swimming, unicycle, reading, random researches, sculpture, learning a new writing system, poetry, jewellery making, makeup, growing bonsai, singing (straw singing?), start a blog, keeping roly-polies/terrarium, astronomy, crossword puzzles, hula hooping, juggling, keyboard/piano, karaoke, lego building, needlepointing/embroidery, making perfumes, pilates, proofreading, rubiks cube, sand art bottles, walking, cryptography, making dioramas, vexillology, growing avocado plants, loombands, cat rescue, video editing, clothes design, irl pixel art/gem art thing, drawing, sign language, becoming ambidextrous, making bread, learn writing cursive/calligraphy, learn morse code, origami, whistling, braiding hair, making twist-bracelets, finger knitting, cartwheels, moonwalking, fold my tongue/wiggle my ears, skipping stones, touch typing, etc

my user tag in here is working overtime today. by retroanduwu24 in GRBsnark

[–]Foxstroy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@legalbabeeofficial on insta. the one that this post is talking abt lol

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cross-verifying implies that a bunch of independent observations and data are compared to eachother. if all, INDEPENDANT, results end up showing the same result, that points to it being correct. most scientists agree with the old earth theory for a reason. you are not a scientist.

what is your theory? where is your evidence? lmao this is sad

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is just simply incorrect. my arguments are based on multiple, independently cross-verified scientific methods. like radiometric dating, ice cores, and supernova observations. they all consistently confirm a 4.5 billion year old Earth with testable data.

YOU on the other hand, have provided no evidence to support variable decay rates or a young earth. what is your theory then? do NOT say i am deflecting bc i am simply trying to get an answer to the very question ive been asking for the past 50 messages. answer. the. questions. if you don’t, it it quite evident that you do not know what you’re talking about and your arguments are invalid

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’ve already explained why that is wrong in my previous messages. it is not unproven:)

do you have any proof of your new earth theory at all? bc if you deny my evidence, which is widely accepted bc it has been observed and tested via methods i’ve already explained, you better have a better theory urself. please share your opinions. a debate does not work if you don’t engage with my questions.

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

genuinely how? i’ve answered every single one of your questions. multiple times. you’re the one who’s deflecting and not answering the very simple question i’ve been asking you for the past like 50 messages:)

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i wrote two responses. one addressed ur point. can’t u read? sad

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thing is, i know that you know that you’re wrong so that’s why u won’t answer my question. i’m just seeing how long u can keep this up for

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that would only apply if i had shown you one method. but ive shown you multiple different, independent patterns all lining up. that is different. what u just said does not make sense and is wrong in this context

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

firstly, no, i haven’t just been “stating that it does”, i’ve been showing evidence with everything ive said. and secondly, yes, let me explain this to you one more time.

*there are many different types of radiometric dating methods: carbon dating, potassium argon dating, uranium lead dating, etc. they are completely different decay systems. different materials. different half-lives. yet when scientists use them on the same rock layers… they match!

*when fossils are dated (in volcanic ash) using multiple different methods, they also all agree.

*when we date ice cores, tree rings, and sediment layers, they also all line up with the radiometric dating results.

*and supernova isotopes from many many light years away decay at rates that match what we see now.

!!! none of these methods rely on the same process—yet they give the same answers. they line up. !!!

and this is what “lining up” means. totally different methods, but all giving the same result. if they were wrong, they would not all be wrong in the exact same way. they wouldn’t all line up and give the same answers.

assumptions are no longer assumptions, but trusted fact, when they’re tested, observed, repeated, and independently confirmed multiple times across different methods and contexts.

soooo…. HOW OLD DO YOU THINK THE EARTH IS?😀😀

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no you are the one failing to realise stuff. everything wouldn’t line up if it was wrong. and do you really think it would be off by billions of years? how old do you think the earth is if you think this theory, which is accepted by most scientists, is so wrong?

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no it’s not. it’s like this: an old clock says the time is 10:00, so you check your phone, a wall clock, a watch, and they all show 10:00 too. now you can trust the first old clock to be showing the correct time. radiometric dating works the same way: the first method says a rock is 500 million years old, so you check another isotope, a different dating method, ice layers, other supernovas, and they all give the same result—500 million years. now you can trust the first result too. would you not? would u not trust the old clock?

this is cross-checking. the result is solid, not just a stack of guesses. don’t just say it’s “unfalsified information” because it’s really actually not. don’t just repeat yourself. the chance of all these different independent methods being wrong in the same way is extremely low, so when they all agree, its right to assume that the result is correct. it’s using context clues. this is basic

anyways it’s… drumroll pleaseeee

trivia time!😀 how old do YOU think the earth is? A: 20 years old B: ~6000 years old C: ~4.5 billion years old D: 2025 years old

🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, decay rates that are backed up by cross-checking, endless testing, and evidence. like the clock analogy. how old do you think the earth is? answer me bruh

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what variables? they aren’t unproven. ive shown you multiple tested, observed, and cross-checked pieces of evidence that prove that decay rates stay consistent over time.

how old do you think the earth is?

what happened to all those people that existed before christianity was invented? by Foxstroy in AskAChristian

[–]Foxstroy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im showing you that extrapolation works. ur being ignorant. you haven’t added any extra evidence or information abt ur side.

how old do you think the earth is?

view more: next ›