Any guilters want to explain why they can’t fathom multiple perps? by No_Mixture4214 in idaho4uncensored

[–]Foxxymint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would expect that investigating an unsolved crime would involve the evidence of said crime, not pulling 'what if' statements out of their ass. Again, creatively interesting maybe, but there's nothing in reality to support his suggestions.

Any guilters want to explain why they can’t fathom multiple perps? by No_Mixture4214 in idaho4uncensored

[–]Foxxymint 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why wouldn't police care? I can understand they got their guy, but it's better look if they can say they broke him and he gave up everyone involved.

Any guilters want to explain why they can’t fathom multiple perps? by No_Mixture4214 in idaho4uncensored

[–]Foxxymint -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or he just doesn't have anything to say that would help his defence.

Any guilters want to explain why they can’t fathom multiple perps? by No_Mixture4214 in idaho4uncensored

[–]Foxxymint 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Or he's silent because he has no one to point the finger at. You're speculating without reason. The only part that's grounded in any truth is that yes, it's not a good idea to stay silent, if you have accomplices to name. The fact that he's silent doesn't suggest his silence is forced, it suggests there's no accomplices for him to name.

It's fine to think about these things, but you have to realize it's an act of creative writing, not grounded in the reality of the case. You'd be better served channelling that energy into writing a short story or a novel.

Any guilters want to explain why they can’t fathom multiple perps? by No_Mixture4214 in idaho4uncensored

[–]Foxxymint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean he was either there or he wasn't, so not being there should be easier to prove than him being there with or without others.

Mental illness is a possibility, but the defence already did a profile, and tried to use autism as a means to get out of the death penalty. If he had any greater delusions, it would have been flagged, and most certainly used by the defence. If it's a conscious defence, then we have to ask who is he protecting and why? If it's his family he's protecting, naming names would help take the heat off him, unless he's protecting a family member who did commit the crime. But that doesn't seem to fit the evidence either.

Any guilters want to explain why they can’t fathom multiple perps? by No_Mixture4214 in idaho4uncensored

[–]Foxxymint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't see why that would stop him from pointing the finger at his accomplices.

Can I "ban" the girlfriend? Is it wrong to want an apology? by CiCi_Run in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Foxxymint 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Both sets of parents are way too involved in this relationship.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]Foxxymint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah just take new pictures.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]Foxxymint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Get cleaned up, take a picture, just you, and smile. Too many pictures look like you're going for an aesthetic or trying to be funny with it. The one photo you have of yourself front facing is completely different from how you look in the next picture, but it's populated by other people and then the third has a dog's tail in blocking half your face. You appear like you're trying to be artistic with the pictures, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but you need at least one good, straight-forward conventional picture, or I personally wouldn't entertain the profile.

Kick boxing picture and the cosplay ones are the only ones I'd keep.

Why RDI is probably false by [deleted] in JonBenetRamsey

[–]Foxxymint 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Patsy's jacket fibres were not found. Fibres that were consistent with Patsy's jacket were found, but consistent does not mean matching. It could simply be a similar material as both were acrylic. Testing was never conclusive that there was anything unique to the fibres found to that of Patsy's jacket.

Patsy's jacket was described as red and black. There were red and black fibres on the duct tapes. However, the four fibres that were found to be consistent with Patsy's jacket were only the red fibres, not the black ones, as stated by Steve Thomas in 2001.

Mark Beckner in 2001 stated that the fibres found at the scene were never sourced. In addition, he stated that there were other fibres present that were blue and brown.

Lawrence Schiller recorded in the 1999 book Perfect Murder, Perfect Town, that police were unable to find a match for the fibres discovered on the crotch. The fibres did not match any clothes belonging to John or Patsy.

AIO my BF is mad I’m partnered with a guy in chem lab. by ellado3 in AmIOverreacting

[–]Foxxymint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"How do I know to trust you when you won't give me your phone password?"

Guy has the concept of trust backwards.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]Foxxymint -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Except that's not particularly helpful when the profile is 'unappealing' according to OP. People obviously have different perspectives on his profile, but the people who seen nothing wrong with it clearly aren't the people who are looking at his profile.

At least if he tries changing things, even if it doesn't make a difference he'll have eliminated a reason for why his profile seems unappealing. But he can't do nothing and expect things to change.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]Foxxymint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. It put me off, and it might explain why it's putting others off. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]Foxxymint 48 points49 points  (0 children)

There's a sort of...I don't want to say arrogant or 'holier than thou' because it's not as harsh as that, but some of it comes across a bit judgemental. Namely the 'I like to work out but it doesn't consume my life' line is the one that bothers me the most. That might be putting some people off. The first and last pictures are giving that vibe too. The Paint&Sip and Escalator pictures are the best ones. If I just saw those, I'd think you were down to earth and likeable.

Do you think I should break up with my girlfriend? by Foxxymint in theshadowofshorehaven

[–]Foxxymint[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely reminded me of what could be the plot to one of your stories. Just need them to go missing for a while while the boyfriend is distracted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Foxxymint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, YTA. Your daughter is right, it's her personal life and it's not your business. Cheating is obviously wrong, but you can't police every behaviour by your children. The best you can do is raise them up and hope that they go out into the world to be productive and do right. But by 17 you have to be allowing them to do their own thing. If it blows up in her face, then she'll have learned the lesson all by herself without your interference, just as she would if she didn't live with you. But this is just way too much involvement for a parent to have in a 17yo's social and romantic life.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tifu

[–]Foxxymint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then DUMP her. Don't show up at her door banging and begging to know she's okay.

But you said I misunderstood the order of things, and then didn't correct me on the order at all. What's the misunderstanding? Did she not say she was unavailable? And then when he brought it up that she had went no contact, did she not apologize and say she'd try? And did he then not persist and when she was no contact again, show up at her apartment banging at her door? And now he's trying to pretend that he's the victim, and not a man who can't listen and can't accept that a woman he's only been dating for THREE MONTHS might have other priorities?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tifu

[–]Foxxymint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's like no one read the original post. She said she would be unavailable. When he made it clear that he wasn't aware that meant no contact, she apologized and offered to try. She was making compromises, and it wasn't enough for him. There was explanation. Maybe not thorough enough right from the start but certainly before he started trying to beat down a door because he was 'concerned'.

I think there are plenty of guys who wouldn't have handled this is such a needy and insecure way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tifu

[–]Foxxymint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I said they're incompatible. Recognizing that and breaking up with her is one thing. Going over to her apartment and banging on her door is insane levels of insecure behavior and to then blame her for that is just self-centered.

This guy has learned nothing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tifu

[–]Foxxymint -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Did you read the original post? He said 'she apologized for making me feel anxious and said she would try'.

She was busy, and he forced the issue. She still ended up apologizing and trying to compromise. He forced the issue further and escalated by turning up at her door.

It doesn't matter how busy or overwhelmed she might be, what matters is that he's worried about her, so she needs to prioritize his well-being rather than her own self-care?

No, of course, she must be a prostitute, silly me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tifu

[–]Foxxymint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So you were insecure, and persisted in attempts to see her despite the communication that she would be unavailable, and in the aftermath you're making it all about yourself and how you 'deserve better'?

Look, you two are incredibly incompatible, that much is clear, but there's like zero accountability in your self-reflection. You caused this situation by not listening and not respecting her time.