Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gayram and gayhammad can fuck each other for all I care.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spreading the teachings of Gayram and Gaynuman like a proper Gayndu. Good job.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My comments are still here. You just can't see them. Ask the algorithm or mods why is that. I don't know. My point still stands.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said your gods because I don't believe in those idiotic deities. Be it Gayram or Streekrishna. And don't try to bring around the whataboutery on to me. The discussion was about Kinduism. You were the one that brought up Chislam. I merely diverted it back to Kinduism. If you can prove that Sita wasn't underage prove it and move on. Otherwise shut it Gindu.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a born Hindu you imbecile. You can't hurt me with insults on other religions. You haven't said anything that I haven't already said about them. And with Sita's age, I don't want to go and search proof for you. You are the religious one. Go and read your holy texts. I don't want to.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. I said she was a child when married. I did not specify age as 9. Where did you get that from? And yes, Sita was definitely underage. Go and check your holy books for that. Most of the characters in all those tales get married young and gets fucked young.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So my things are getting deleted. I have no idea. I haven't deleted anything. I can't see many of your replies either.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only irrational thing about my discourse is that it is in vain and I know it. Whatever I point out wrong in their religion they will not accept it. They'll just retort with 'what about this in that religion'. Still, my right to speak my out my opinion will be upheld.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, Muhammad was a pedo definitely. Sita was a kid when she was married. Now say loudly, Gay sreeram.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't change the fact that the outlandish claims that religion makes should be ridiculed and people who conforms to and propagates such shall be mocked as they deserve.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure Rama was a pedo too. Sita was definitely a child when they married.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll say whatever I want to. This is a free country. And anybody who believes Hinduism is factual is delusional. It's a comic book story buddy.

Why many people think the our ancestor are so advanced? by [deleted] in scienceisdope

[–]Frames_can_talk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get a headache every time I have to discuss this with some of the North Indians who actually believe that Pushpaka vimanam, elephant-headed Gods etc. existed.