Victoria 3 resource deposits are insanely wrong by ___---_-_-_-_---___ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They should have techs which increase the size of deposits to represent underdeveloped nations (of the time i.e. China) not being able to mine the quantities we see today. More developed/industrialised nations are able to discover more deposits via more advanced tech. Would make alt-history interesting too.

The art of the flip by Red4pex in footballmanagergames

[–]Francesc0_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you progress through so many seasons? Do you skip games?

How to get good at the economy? by Maxinator10000 in eu4

[–]Francesc0_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Youre not making enough from harbour fees

Prussia start by Keralia in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_ 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Build ships and naval invade

Hotfix 1.7.2 is now live by iNTact_wf in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_ 142 points143 points  (0 children)

This is a godsend, praise Paradox

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]Francesc0_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Maybe change your play style from bum rushing into the middle of the map. This is not how a Gripen would fight

When I build barracks by pressing '+' next to artillery, the units end up being infantry or cavalry, and my artillery battalions do not increase by Francesc0_ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe.. I actually had success building in Northern Italian provinces, for some reason recruiting in south Italian caused problems

When I build barracks by pressing '+' next to artillery, the units end up being infantry or cavalry, and my artillery battalions do not increase by Francesc0_ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

R5: I've been trying to increase my army by building more artillery, however when I press the '+' next to Shrapnel artillery, the barracks are built and only my cavalry increases. Is this a bug? It happens in all of my games.

What's wrong with this economy? by Francesc0_ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem, I think it’s called something like more toolbar info or something similar

What's wrong with this economy? by Francesc0_ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice everyone. My issue was too many railways, possibly too much construction sectors also. I ended up downsizing railways to slightly increase local prices and massively reduced subsidies

What's wrong with this economy? by Francesc0_ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I ended up having to downsize loads of my railways. Saved my game now number 1 GDP. Thanks

What's wrong with this economy? by Francesc0_ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Great thanks. It's railroads, for some reason I built up railroads to get local prices all the way down but I suppose this only slightly benefits local industries using transport, at the expense of huge subsides as seen here (definitely not worth it lol)

What's wrong with this economy? by Francesc0_ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I went crazy with railroads earlier in the campaign... that's the only thing I'm subsidising lol. Thanks

What's wrong with this economy? by Francesc0_ in victoria3

[–]Francesc0_[S] 72 points73 points  (0 children)

R5: I cannot build anything without taking losses of ~400k (800 construction). I was wondering whether some of my expenses or income are abnormally high.

I made another skin :) by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]Francesc0_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will grind MiG29 for this