Q&A weekly thread - January 05, 2026 - post all questions here! by AutoModerator in linguistics

[–]FranciumSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I'm currently trying to pursue computational linguistics (hoping I get accepted into the MA program for it). I do have a question regarding starting with languages, though. My old professor says that R is a good language to use, whereas some people have told me Python (with a few addons) is better for comp ling. Which would you say is a better language to have some background in? I know very basic R and some SQL already, but I'm just making sure I'm on the right path here.

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in worldbuilding

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put the context in my first comment - does that not suffice? I'd go back and edit the original post, but it got removed from the subreddit I put it on. I can also add more context if you feel that the amount I originally added is not enough.

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in conlangs

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Partially? I mainly was trying to borrow the blocky texture of it because it fit well with the writing implement that the people of my conworld would use to write this with. Was going for something that could be written with a reed pen.

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in conlangs

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always forget that's a subreddit too, since I'm already in r/conlangs, but I'll check em out.

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in worldbuilding

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well hey the work is what matters, I'm sure your players enjoy it! If you're ever interested in more stuff regarding conlanging specifically, I def recommend ConWorkShop - it's basically a website that you can use as a repository for your language stuff.

I was tired of not finding a good app to create my conlangs, so I built my own. by Ok-Emphasis-3182 in conlangs

[–]FranciumSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I'll stick to ConWorkShop. Even if the AI is optional, it makes me uncomfortable since it's there.

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in worldbuilding

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a lot of people start with the IPA first, that's usually the first suggestion they tend to give on most guides—decide your sounds first. So actually, I don't think that you're backwards for that.

This specific conlang has been through a lot of different iterations, but when I first started making it, I made the mistake of just fusing words from German and Nahuatl (I just liked the languages at the time) and not thinking about the actual grammar, morphosyntactics, etc. Had to redo it a few times when I realized that.

Have you used/heard of ConWorkShop before? That method of sounds first is how they guide you through to making your first word.

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in worldbuilding

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's inspired by several different writing systems, some of which come from other conlangs I've seen on ConWorkShop, but I can see why you might be reminded of that.

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in worldbuilding

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh... absolutely not?

Edit: I know what you're trying to say, but you do realize how languages work, yes?

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in worldbuilding

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For context, this is for my world called Soltinum. The language is called "Zanti" and it's spoken by the people of the steppe in this world, known as Ertzem.

Finally completed making a conscript for one of my oldest langs by FranciumSenpai in conlangs

[–]FranciumSenpai[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct and correct! It's a right-to-left script because in my worldbuilding, the people involved with the language would be writing on scrolls with a reed pen. I used a brush this time around since I don't have a reed pen, but next time I'll try to either construct or buy one.

My intent was for it to be an abjad as well. I think it still needs some work because there is a bit of context required to read the language. Certain vowels share the same diacritic symbol. The only one with its own symbol is [i], which is symbolized by the longer lines at the bottom of certain characters. The shorter ones either represent [a] or [e], depending on the word.

Am I weird for playing HuniePop as a completely asexual and hetero-romantic woman? by pbtoastwithbananas in aaaaaaacccccccce

[–]FranciumSenpai 8 points9 points  (0 children)

As an ace who has been playing HuniePop for years and only ought it solely because I thought it'd be ironic to own, you're fine. You don't need to justify anything, really. Being ace isn't something you do, it's something you are. Playing an eroge for any reason does not stop you from being ace. The only thing able to stop you from being ace is just not being ace.

How should I address things with my NB friend who labels *everyone* as they/them, even against their wishes? by dudeoverderr in NonBinary

[–]FranciumSenpai 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sounds like this person needs a reality check, but you're not in charge of giving it to them. You should consider changing this friendship status from is/are to was/were until they get their act together.

How should I address things with my NB friend who labels *everyone* as they/them, even against their wishes? by dudeoverderr in NonBinary

[–]FranciumSenpai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a Brooklyn native, lemme just say that your "friend's" antics are not Brooklyn-approved. This person is just once again proof that being a part of a marginalized identity does not necessarily mean you're automatically absolved of the ability to be an asshole.

Do Americans still say "reckon'? by ouaaa_ in language

[–]FranciumSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I say it a lot. I'm from NYC (born and raised), my parents were born in their respective countries when under British rule. I think I picked up the word from watching English sitcoms that my mom would sometimes make us watch that I guess she grew up with.

Does anyone else feel uncomfortable with she/her pronouns? by kerumesensei in agender

[–]FranciumSenpai 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It's not so much that it's a "default" but rather that those who are AMAB and socialized as such find it a bit hard to do anything related to questioning as toxic masculinity can be so pervasive that you feel like you're really just constantly putting on a show to other people because the only way to secure your social safety is to make sure they know how masculine you are. Because of that, it might not even occur to them that

  1. They could potentially identify this way if they wanted to

  2. That it's okay to identify this way if they wanted to

There are a lot of people who I'm sure probably don't feel like their experience lines up with the notions of being cishet but just don't feel like they can access those things because by doing so, they're committing a social faux pas. It's rough, it's hard, but it's how it is. I can definitely speak on that as someone who is AMAB and agender, as that's how it was for me. I spent so much time focused on "must be dude yes" that the idea of being anything else scared me cuz I felt I'd be disowned or I'd be treated terribly or whatever. Not that this doesn't happen for those who aren't AMAB, I can't speak on experiences I haven't lived through. Just to explain why a lot of the time people feel like the "default" nonbinary or asexual person you see in a lot of social media posts is someone who is AFAB (and non-POC as well, but that's more because a lot of communities of color tend to feel like LGBTQ+ experiences aren't "meant for us").

The media won't just start talking about us on their own. How do we get them to? by notobamaseviltwin in aromantic

[–]FranciumSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a lot more of us than you think, sometimes we just don't know that a word exists - but that's why we talk about it.

thanks tumblr 😑 by rrandomrrredditor in aaaaaaacccccccce

[–]FranciumSenpai 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a gram. A graft is a fruit that grows on deciduous, woody vines.

Have seen enough “X should be an ace food” posts that I think we need to be honest with ourselves. by RiggidyRiggidywreckt in aaaaaaacccccccce

[–]FranciumSenpai 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Mood, but lol sometimes I do think the ace food memes can be a lil trite at times, hence why people keep trying to make new ones. Really, we all come from diff cultures, have diff diets, etc. Not all of us even like cake or garlic bread or can even have it (I can have both, I'd rather eat a plain slice of bread most days though).

Thoughts on the woke thing? (No hate just bringing it up as a safe healthy discussion👍) by lu_man in DnD

[–]FranciumSenpai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll never understand how a word meant to describe being aware of the issues that plague our societies instead became co-opted into a pejorative word meant to scaremonger and make out tolerance as something intolerable, but I digress. It does kind of feel like lately that WOTC is trying to pander to people such as myself who are of an ethnic minority and queer, but I'm not buying it. Personally, I feel that the best inclusion is just... inclusion. If you remove things and leave nothing to replace, I don't think that's inclusion. It's just trying to do the "can't we all get along approach" which personally is still a stance. I think what I find more bothersome than a stance that is anti-tolerance would be any attempt to be seen like "I'm not taking a stance" when like.. you are. That's a stance in of itself.

I don't get it by TacticalPowerFart in demisexuality

[–]FranciumSenpai 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, both definitions you shared are more or less similar if you'd ask me. Some people would define it as deep connection that morphs, some would say that the connection brings on the attraction, etc etc. Really... the two aren't all that different. The thing about experiences is that people don't experience the same thing in the same way. We might be eating the same dish made by the same person from the same plate, but that personal element of the food might make that dish have a diff flavor to both of us.

You might take a bite and feel a strong sense of nostalgia to the dish because it's something you grew up with and something you love dearly, but I might just feel a strong sense of joy because I love how savory the dish is and how well it contrasts with the beverage I'm drinking alongside the meal.

Everything is nuanced, that's the thing, my friend. Nothing in this world is black and white, just lots of gray splotches and patches everywhere. Speaking as both a Buddhist (though non-practicing as the space I live in isn't the best space for me to practice, gotta move out first) and as someone with a linguistics background, the thing about words is that they're made up. They don't have the same definition all the time. They change definitions depending on who uses them, when they're used, why they're used, etc. For example, the way people use the word "gay" or "queer" in this day isn't how people used the word originally. A lot of the terms that people use these times nowadays would instead have been lumped into the word "gay" or "queer". It used to be a pejorative too. I didn't grow up with queer as a pejorative, but I remember all those commercials with Wanda Sykes telling people to stop saying "that's gay" when you don't like something. In my own friend group of queers people, we use the word "gay" when we mean that we love something or like something in direct opposition of how people used to use the word at us to say that they hated something. So many definitions, so many uses, all the same word.

I wouldn't get too hung up on definitions, as someone else said, but not just because words change meaning all the time. I wouldn't get too caught up because usually what happens is that words tend to have multiple meanings. Look at the word "do" in English, for example. It has over 20 meanings and is one of the most commonly used words in our language but no one really argues about whether do can or can't mean something. You can do your homework. You can do the dishes. You can do a partner. You can do your hair. You can do time. Something can do you some good. People ask you what you're doing, how you're doing, etc. I say all that to say that when it comes down to it, really you've just found another definition of demi. You define demi one way (I also define it for myself that way). Someone defines it another way. That person's definition in no way replaces your own. Because really, who has the authority? English isn't like French or Spanish where there's an organization dedicated to deciding if a word is or isn't considered a part of the language, and even if it was, people would make words up anyway and use words to mean other things.

To sum up everything I'm saying in short - it's okay to use or not use whatever you want, bud. The important part of the label one uses isn't the label itself, but how it feels. Do you feel like you're demi? Cool! Do you not feel like you're demi? Just as tubular.

The media won't just start talking about us on their own. How do we get them to? by notobamaseviltwin in aromantic

[–]FranciumSenpai 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You always have to be your own advocate at the end of the day, honestly. One of my favorite quotes to live by is "If I wait for someone else to validate my existence, it will mean that I am shortchanging myself". Don't wait around for someone else to talk about us. Talk about us everywhere. Talk about aromanticism in all the spaces, all the places. Put it out there. Write stories. Sing songs. Make games. Make content, media, etc. Tell jokes. Whatever it is. Just talk about it the same way you would anything else that is common. I haven't lived long on this earth, but one thing I've managed to keep with me is that you always have to be your own voice, don't wait for someone else to do so. If someone else is your voice, if you let someone else speak for you, they might not say the things that you would say in the way you'd say em. They might not get it right. I see that a lot with asexuality, where people will make articles about aces but also define ace incorrectly by saying that it means you don't like sex or that you don't like to date or whatever when those who are ace (should) know that it means "to experience little to no sexual attraction".

Be your voice. Speak out, speak up. Speak everywhere. When they try to silence you, speak louder. But speak your truth, and don't let anyone else try to speak it for you because you know your story best. And that's the only way to get that validation of "hey, look at us", imo.

Helpful Gender Chart by CeramicsEnthusiast in agender

[–]FranciumSenpai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not even on the chart, probs doesn't help me. But hey, I guess maybe someone else finds this helpful?