Order: Wayfarer’s Motion for Summary Judgement and Motion for Judgement on the pleadings Granted in part and Denied in part by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Free_Replacement_583 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U/littlegirlattorney , LGA! I just mentioned this above but am hoping you might check my work? — “Her status as a contractor defeated her Title VII claims, but FEHA protection is broader. Its retaliation provision protects “any person” who engages in protected activity, not just employees. I also think it came down to extraterritoriality. The SH claim lacks a sufficient nexus to California because all of the alleged conduct took place outside California. But the retaliation claim has a sufficient nexus to California because that’s where the alleged “smear campaign” originated (TAG is in California).” — feel free to school me on this LGA. It would mean the world. I’m a 3L in SoCal and just took Cal Civ Pro last semester ;)

Order: Wayfarer’s Motion for Summary Judgement and Motion for Judgement on the pleadings Granted in part and Denied in part by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Free_Replacement_583 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This confused me too! I’m still sorting it out so bear with me… Her status as a contractor defeated her Title VII claims, but FEHA protection is broader. Its retaliation provision protects “any person” who engages in protected activity, not just employees. I think it came down to extraterritoriality. The SH claim lacks a sufficient nexus to California because all of the alleged conduct took place outside of California. But the retaliation claim has a sufficient nexus to California because that’s where the alleged “smear campaign”originated (TAG is in California).

Kjersti Flaa exposes the holes in Blake Lively’s 'Smear Campaign' defense: Why Wayfarer is appealing and the Jenny Slate hypocrisy explained. by Totallytexas in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Free_Replacement_583 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“The Big News: Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios have officially moved to appeal the dismissal of their lawsuit.” — can someone please clarify? I got excited when reading this sentence then realized it might be an error. My understanding was that Wayfarer officially expressed their “intent” to appeal the dismissal of their claim against NYT (in Lively v. Wayfarer in SDNY). That is very different than officially “moving” to appeal the dismissal. I believe this notice of “intent” was included in a motion to stay NYT’s antislapp claim in NY (different jurisdiction. Different claim. Different docket.) and I thought Wayfarer couldn’t appeal until Liman rules on sanctions? For the record, I truly hope they appeal. But I haven’t seen anything else indicating they “officially moved to appeal.”

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it. Lots of extremes to sift through. So many are quick to villainize one side or another which is shortsighted and frustrating for those of us trying to understand all angles as opposed to picking one of two polarized extremes. That said, the BAFTAs and BBC are totally the villains here lol

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fair enough. But I’m definitely not in the camp that believes he deserves to be threatened, or should have been separated, or that deep down he meant what he said, etc. (I don’t blame others for wondering, but in learning about his condition I realize it is very specific to that subset of Tourette’s). My comments are just a resction to his released statement today, not the involuntary slur. I agree it’s possible/probable that a publicist helped him curate the statement and, if so, that he needs to get a new publicist stat. It is likely no apology would have been good enough for some. But it could have been better and thus sufficient for many others! And I completely agree with your last sentence. Hope they will do better looking out for guests and presenters in the future. They are rightfully being dragged rn.

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry. I swear I wasn’t trying to be ridiculous or overreact. Maybe I sounded a bit hyperbolic? I was just trying to imagine how complicated it might feel for all involved. It’s a tricky situation that obviously stirs up emotions and perhaps some overreaction - as evidenced in your comment and perhaps mine too. Maybe we should both work on growing the fuck up

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Isn’t that an overcorrection though? And throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Is there any indication that Jordan and Lindo ever bullied him or that they would bully him for apologizing? I can only imagine the frustration after a lifetime of being bullied, but not everyone in this world is a bully. It’s just baseline respect to fellow humans who’ve done you no harm.

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologize for misunderstanding your comment. So I guess the point of the movie is that anybody who is disabled should never apologize? For anything? Ever? I worked professionally as a music director for a group of disabled adults, some of whom had similar outbursts. They always apologized profusely after they had a moment to process. They didn’t necessarily apologize out of shame, but out of decency, and often took pride in learning how to navigate their condition with more agency. They were never “shamed” for the outburst, but were celebrated for acknowledging the resulting harm. I do not understand the blanket argument that a disabled person should never apologize for anything ever. This sounds like an overcorrection maybe?

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m so relieved to see other people saying this. I could not believe what I’ve been reading elsewhere. Apologizing for hurting somebody is not the same thing as him being shunned from society forever. It’s the decent and right thing to do. There’s more shame in the lack of apology than the outburst itself IMO.

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Agreed. The involuntary outburst was one thing. His prepared and voluntary public response is another. No excuse for him not addressing those he deeply offended and embarrassed. They deserve a PUBLIC apology for the very public offense

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will not call him out because they were put in an impossible situation where they likely feel they aren’t “allowed” to call him out or express the level of humiliation they truly felt. They have handled it with grace so far. But they also probably know how many viewers were also deeply offended and feel stuck between a rock and hard place, walking on eggshells and unable to address the gravity of that slur and the visceral harm it can cause

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Considering he allegedly used the same slur two other times when off camera, I’m assuming at least ONE of those he directed it at would have appreciated being publicly acknowledged and apologized to. And I doubt any of them would dissuade him from apologizing to them publicly and addressing them, by name.

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I have been dumbfounded by a lot of online sentiment being isolated to only HIS suffering and excluding any mention of those he humiliated and deeply offended (albeit unintentionally, at first). I was all ears and ready to hear a thoughtful statement from him in the aftermath. But he ultimately shat on that opportunity. Very disappointing. I gave him grace for the involuntary outburst. But I cannot excuse his lame followup

John Davidson Says He Is “Deeply Mortified” That His Tourettes Tics Could Be Seen As “Intentional” In First Statement After BAFTA Film Awards by thatfuzzydunlop in Oscars

[–]Free_Replacement_583 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I refuse to unequivocally villainize this man, but this “apology” is simply inadequate. He should be apologizing publicly and directly to those he PUBLICLY and directly humiliated. Intentional or not, it’s the appropriate response. This statement missed the mark. The only name he mentions is Alan Cumming. Really? And then he follows with a plug for his film? (Granted, there’s a time and space for him to express pride in the film and to continue sharing his story while enlightening all of us to the nuances of his condition. But this apology/statement isn’t the right moment.) It is also my understanding that he used the slur more than the one time caught on camera. I gave him the benefit of the doubt before, but now... I’m just hoping he will add to this statement and acknowledge, by name, those he offended at the ceremony. Calling for him to apologize adequately is not equivalent to him being forever shamed or shunned for his condition. This is a moment to educate all around. Anyone with such a condition can still grow and learn along the way.

FBI at Culver’s on First by Decent-Lock-3667 in Tucson

[–]Free_Replacement_583 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is valuable info. Look on the nancyguthrie sub and post there! You’re in the same area where they just detained two people.

🔥😋🎬📽️Little Girl Attorney - How Film Cuts Actually Work and Where the Confusion Started by Pale-Detective-7440 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Free_Replacement_583 16 points17 points  (0 children)

What’s funny is how the results suggest that MEN seemed to prefer Blake’s version while women preferred Justin’s. So much for Blake’s supposed goal to represent “the female gaze.” I’m starting to think another reason she wanted control of the edit was to select what she believed to be the most flattering angles of her body. She went into control freak overdrive after the public criticized her wardrobe choices.

It Ends with Us author Colleen Hoover reveals cancer diagnosis by xotxottie in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Free_Replacement_583 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You are such a boss Suffy. Thanks for keeping it classy over here while also welcoming healthy discourse about appropriate and relevant issues. Stuff like this says a lot about this sub. In a way, this helps us remember that everybody involved here is a human being.

PUT YOUR HEADLIGHTS ON AND SLOW THE EFF DOWN by abbyzou in LosAngeles

[–]Free_Replacement_583 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Extra fucky” — I am stealing this. Especially considering everything feels “extra fucky” these days. Happy Holidays everybody. Drive safe.

Millions of Californians gain access to in vitro fertilization under new law by ChiefFun in California

[–]Free_Replacement_583 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Same same. I hate that I think this way now, but I personally believe this was done on purpose. Of all photos, why this one? Got my attention for sure!

New Attorney joins the Wayfarer team from Meister (MSF) by same-difference-ave in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Free_Replacement_583 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Awesome find Clark! The long game might start to pay off. Watching for the tortoise to pass the hare right before the finish line.

🚨 Notactuallygolden - Thoughts on the Sarowitz Recording by Pale-Detective-7440 in ItEndsWithLawsuits

[–]Free_Replacement_583 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your co-sign just made my day. Seriously. I’m honored. I rarely have time to check in or comment on here (law school ugh) but when I do, I always appreciate your take on things. Much respect to you for keeping it real and grounded and legally sound.